Posted on 07/21/2016 7:03:24 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
#NeverCruz.
Hewitt is a loser, just as Cruz is.
“10:11: On MSNBC, Hugh Hewitt claims Ted Cruz “hit a home run” last night. He claims Cruz “set the bar very high for Donald Trump tonight.” [Memo to Hewitt: voters don’t care about how “well” someone sounds while litigating cases before the Supreme Court. Sounding “well” probably means a candidate will have a tough time connecting with regular people who don’t speak like lawyers.]”
Breitbart.com
Marco Rubio , Ted Cruz, John Kasich Pledge to Support Donald Trump As The Republican Candidate
GOP RNC Republican National Convention Cleveland Jul-20-2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty1eETVIFMs
I’ve asked this on a couple of similar threads. Can Cruz’s admonition to vote the ticket “up and down” be interpreted as a grudging, backhanded endorsement?
Going back on his word that he would endorse Trump if he was the nominee will likely spell the end of his national aspirations. I know I was a Cruz supporter, but now he’s lost that support and won’t ever be able to get it back. A real man doesn’t renege on his commitments.
It’s obvious he only agreed to that commitment because he didn’t believe he’d have to honor it, thinking he would win. Commitments don’t work that way. Commitments require us to plow through them and honor them, even if they don’t turn out the way we wanted them to. They shouldn’t be taken lightly, and that’s exactly what he did. If he was never going to support Trump, he should’ve said so, up front. That would’ve been the principled stand. And then he wouldn’t be shown to be a liar last night.
what’s funny about the pledge they made, it was designed to stop Trump from running third party should he loose the nomination..came back to bite them big time.
No, since Cruz’s words “vote your conscience” is identical to the label “vote your conscience” used by the anti-Trump movement to try to create a brokered convention by removing the requirement that convention delegates must stick to their pledged vote.
I used to think that Ted Cruz was a very smart guy. Now? Not so much.
Cruz, in his speech last night and in today’s speech/Q&A in front of the Texas delegation, said that he set a standard for his endorsement of a President - that the person in question would defend the Constitution and defend our liberties. There is nothing is wrong with that, and it is what I want to always hear from ANY candidate for office...in an absolute vacuum. But we don’t live in a vacuum. Right now, there is a binary choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump - one of them will (barring a severe health problem, death or civil war touched off by Obama trying to cancel the election) be the next POTUS. There is no other choice - the primaries are OVER, we no longer have the ability to choose THE perfect candidate...now it is about stopping whomever we DISlike the most.
Cruz did recognize that simple fact in 2012 - he endorsed Mitt Romney, hardly a doctrinaire conservative and defender of the Constitution (just look at his stance on the 2nd Amendment, as just one example among many). Here’s the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mitt_Romney_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2012#U.S._Senators Cruz is listed under the category of “State, Local and Territory Officials.”
Further, Cruz indicated that the Tea Party (a group founded explicitly by conservatives who value the Constitution and felt betrayed by the typical politicians running things in DC) would likely endorse Romney, with the following quote: “Conservatives will stand united in November. The stakes are too high,” Cruz said. “The Tea Party will show up en masse to support Mitt Romney.” Source: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/08/ted-cruz-newsmaker-gop-convention-texas-senate/1#.V5DWsLuAOko
So what is different in 2016? Why would Cruz endorse Romney, no stalwart defender of the Constitution and our liberties, against Obama - the diametric opposite of a stalwart defender of the Consitution and our liberties? Well, because it makes sense to have done so. He recognized THEN, a mere 4 years ago, that we faced a binary choice - it would be either Romney or Obama, and “Conservatives will stand united in November. The stakes are too high.” THAT was a sensible, logical and good decision. But this election is really no different - Trump may (emphasis on “MAY”) not be the perfect defender of the Constitution and our liberties, but we as a nation face a binary choice between him and Hillary Clinton - who is a political carbon-copy of Obama, being the nearly perfect ANTI-defender of the Constitution and our liberties. Why is Cruz not endorsing Trump against Clinton, when he endorsed Romney against Obama?
The answer is simple: He’s got an ego the size of an aircraft carrier, and it is interfering with Cruz’ logic function. He’s butthurt, badly, and simply cannot rise above his own personal feelings and do what is best for this country, and fight with every fiber of his being against Clinton. That is sad and incredibly disappointing - because outside of this Presidential election season, I have been a genuine admirer of Cruz and what he has stood for (well, I’m not thrilled about his trade votes, but no one is perfect). Now I can’t be. Now he looks small, like most politicians. He looks and sounds like a walking, talking ego. THAT is not principle, that is not high-minded, that is not serving the public and defending the Constitution.
You know, not that long ago we had a Presidential election that was decided by 538 popular votes in a single state. Cruz knows that, particularly since he worked his tail off to help preserve George W. Bush’s victory (oh, and BTW, Bush was hardly the perfect defender of the Constitution that Cruz pretends to want as a candidate - but he was head and shoulders above Al Gore). He also knows that such a circumstance could happen again, and that he has a pretty large and very loyal following. He knows that many among this loyal following of his will not vote for Trump unless he gives a full-throated endorsement of Trump. So what Cruz is doing is putting this country at risk of losing a very close election, should we be in that scenario again. All because of his ego.
Unless this is some strategy cooked up between Trump and Cruz to have Cruz go through all of these machinations and then later come out with a full-throated endorsement (which I don’t think is likely), I’m done with Cruz as a possible POTUS - forever! I’ll wait and see if anyone tries to primary him in 2018, and evaluate that person (and, NO, I won’t be voting for a David Dewhurst/John Cornyn kind of candidate). Before last night, I would have reflexively voted for Cruz, but not now, not after that performance. The time for personal feelings is OVER, the time to look for a perfect or near perfect candidate is over. Now is the time to unite behind the better candidate - and Donald J. Trump is the better candidate, and will be the better POTUS, by every single measure that is important. Cruz has utterly failed to understand and implement this idea by endorsing Trump, and I cannot forgive him - because “the stakes are too high” - YOUR words, Senator Cruz, not mine.
“Cruz has committed political suicide...if Trump wins...big IF!”
He is in the McCain/Graham dog camp now.
Second, it was the squandering of a priceless political opportunity. Speaking slots that prominent in national conventions make or break careers. Such a slot in in the 2004 Democrat convention launched 0bama's national political career. Cruz had his shot and turned it into flavorless sludge. He won't get another one.
Given these factors, if he couldn't bring himself to endorse Trump despite his promise, and I could understand that, he should have declined the speaking slot. What he did do didn't hurt Trump, it hurt Cruz.
It does not matter to me what Trump does. I will not be voting Calgary Ted for senate in 2018 or for anything ever again.
On the other hand, Trump looks like and seems to be a wolf. On closer examination, he has the heart of a sheep.
1 Samuel 16:7 (KJV) But the Lord said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.
I think Cruz must have thought we, the voters, would
admire his “principled” and “manly” stance in “defending”
his wife. However, TWO WRONGS DON’T MAKE A RIGHT!
Cruz broke his pledge (no matter how he tries to parse it).
He should have just declined the speaking slot and kept his
piehole ZIPPED! That way we wouldn’t have seen his true
colors, which are not RED, WHITE & BLUE! (Fang & I voted
for Cruz in the primary & now I’m regretting it. I HOPE
Fang did not contribute to his campaign fund.)
Now, I’ve got to get over this crap and concentrate on
doing everything I can to block HITLER-Y’S hook or crook
election! Which is what CRUZ should have done!!!!
He is worse than Obama, he is a modern day Judas
“Most Christians are like sheep and easily led. Cruz looked like a sheep and caught the attention and support of sheep-leaders. His speech last night clearly revealed what many had already perceived: Cruz is in fact not a sheep, but a wolf, full of pride, arrogance, and a destroyer.
On the other hand, Trump looks like and seems to be a wolf. On closer examination, he has the heart of a sheep.”
Trump is not going to lose.
Buck up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.