Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How We Killed the Tea Party
Politico Magazine ^ | Paul H. Jossey

Posted on 08/14/2016 6:44:48 AM PDT by fluorescence

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: yuleeyahoo

maches = marches


21 posted on 08/14/2016 7:22:26 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Those are my principles, and if you do not like them...well I have others. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The TEA Party movement failed because fakers like Rubio and Ayotte were not true conservatives. In this incarnation, instead of trusting politicians, we are trusting ourselves. We picked our candidate in the most organic way. It’s Trump!


22 posted on 08/14/2016 7:31:01 AM PDT by uncitizen (Americanism NOT Globalism! - Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Ted Cruz is a better-known example of a politician who used the Tea Party sentiment to advance his own career and agenda. The anti-politics-as-usual, anti-insider, populist, American first spirit lives now in Trump-Pence 2016.


23 posted on 08/14/2016 7:34:39 AM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

When you’re running an insurgency, a hierarchical command structure assures defeat. Modern warfare is asymmetrical, decentralized and unconventional. Trump has run a model insurgent campaign.

It may be too little, too late, but many Americans have glimpsed the actual scope of the Washington Plantation. Politicians at all levels have conspired to construct an elaborate Potemkin Theater with the single goal of captivating both Progressives and Conservatives to ensure they all remain on the reservation.

Trump has blown up the parties’ false binary class structure and assembled a base that shattered boundaries once safely assumed unbridgeable by the other sides. While his methodology confounds the opposition, he has built a network that defies definition under conventional politics. The energy he has tapped can sustain a long engagement; let’s hope it lasts long enough to destroy all those who have sold out our nation for personal gain.


24 posted on 08/14/2016 7:37:25 AM PDT by antidisestablishment (If those who defend our freedom do not know liberty, none of us will have either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

What I saw was a bunch of opportunists who began calling themselves ‘leaders’ of a grass roots movement without any organization. All of a sudden you had all these competing “tea party” organizations and leaders who set themselves up to make some money.

I think smart folks understood what was happening and since they couldn’t find a single organization which could begin to regularize itself with local chapters, state chapters, and national conventions to select leaders, the smart folks became disillusioned.

Trump could have inherited these folks and put them into an organization, but he apparently isn’t a believer in formal organizations. This was an opportunity missed—for the country and for Trump.


25 posted on 08/14/2016 7:44:04 AM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

<< But he [Trump] is the second coming of the Tea Party. >>

I’ve had the same thoughts. Trump is the most TEA-party-like candidate of all who ran in the primary.


26 posted on 08/14/2016 7:46:47 AM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

As to the IRS, if you have an office that controls PAC formation, wouldn’t you approve only opposition PACs you knew would corruptly use the money for PAC insiders, and disapprove PACs that were truly ideological? Isn’t this part of what Louis Lerner did?


27 posted on 08/14/2016 7:47:20 AM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence
Hmm, YMMV, but I don't "feel" killed.


<

"if liberty means anything,
it means the right to tell people what they don’t want to hear"
--George Orwell


So STFU Yourself, Captain.

28 posted on 08/14/2016 7:49:48 AM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HLPhat

Captain Uniparty...could his true identity be...MITT ROMNEY???


29 posted on 08/14/2016 7:52:03 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Rinse and repeat until the executive boards of these groups are all very wealthy, have shown no real results, and have all moved on to consulting jobs. Likely to teach others how to run the same scam. The tea party groups are now all shells, run by nobodies, and are completely broke because no one believes in them anymore.

Well said.

Someone once said - A republic IF YOU CAN KEEP it.

Lazy and stupid is the way to Socialism. It is unfortunate that the current crop of posters on this site, for the most part can be classified as LOW INFORMATION. The hope is that they will become educated and VOTE OFTEN in the PRIMARIES.

The next interesting primary is Arizona - Any bets on who wins??

30 posted on 08/14/2016 7:59:44 AM PDT by DanZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

I’m another of the teeming millions.


31 posted on 08/14/2016 8:06:44 AM PDT by mcshot (The "Greatest Generation" would never have allowed the trashing of our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

I’ve been warning about this scam using the Tea Party and it’s supporters for years. First, Freedom works jumped in, then BIG, CORRUPT lobbyists like open Border Sal Russo started Tea Party Express and Jenny Beth Martin and her scam of Tea Party patriots. There have been others also....they spend the contribution $$ on themselves!

more info here: http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=Tea+party+express


32 posted on 08/14/2016 8:07:06 AM PDT by AuntB (Trump is our Ben Franklin - Brilliant, Boisterous, Brave and ALL AMERICAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

The Tea party wasn’t destroyed. It just escalated with Trump.

The Tea party was infiltrated with political money grubbing autonomous PACS capitalizing on general public discontent.


33 posted on 08/14/2016 8:10:27 AM PDT by Fhios (Progressives just don't know when to stop digging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

The Tea Party movement was not an anti-establishment movement. It was a fiscal-conservative movement. It wasn’t a matter of the Tea Party winning so now they are hated because they are establishment. It was a matter of candidates being elected as fiscal-conservative then either just vanishing into the system, or even worse becoming active collaborators with the agendas they were elected to stop.

An electoral victory means nothing to their supporters if the candidates do not uphold their promises.


34 posted on 08/14/2016 8:10:56 AM PDT by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

It was completely anti-establishment. That’s why they branded the enemy the “GOPe”. And yes the candidates elected disappeared into the system, because the system exists to crush small rebellions. As much noise as the Tea Party made they only got a couple dozen people elected, WAY out numbered.

Electoral victory means nothing period. It’s a big system, it’s been put there by 2 parties whose primary goal is their own power, they crush any opposition. The committee structure alone guarantees anti-establishment rebellions like the Tea Party can never win. Congressmen who don’t play along don’t get good committee memberships, without good committee memberships they have no power to wield, and of course the minute they play along the people who voted them in consider them collaborators.


35 posted on 08/14/2016 8:21:13 AM PDT by discostu (If you need to load or unload go to the white zone, you'll love it, it's a way of life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

“Consider the corrupt source of this nonsense.”

Well, sorry, but Politico got this one right. So called ‘conservatives’ have been scamming all of us for years and giving NOTHING to the candidates we want! Tea Party Express, which sadly FR still ‘associates’ with on their front page is one of the worst, led by open border LOBBYIST Sal Russo!

[snip]
Is the Tea Party Express Just a Fundraising Scam?
Tom Dougherty / August 11, 2014
$9.5 million raised, at a cost of $8 million, with less than $400,000 going to candidates.
What would you consider a charity that raised almost $10 million, but actually used less than 5% of that total on its mission and programs? By every reasonable definition, you’d have to consider it woefully ineffective, at best, a fraud, at worst.
Consider then that the Tea Party Express has raised just over $9.5 million between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014, but has spent barely $380,000 directly, or indirectly, to benefit the candidates they support. Also, as they spent more than they received, their cash-on-hand decreased by almost $350,000; from $848,000 on January 1, 2013 to $498,000 on June 30, 2014.
The direct costs for raising that $9.5 million were more than $8 million, or 85% of total receipts, with more than $3.6 million paid out to Tea Party Express founder, Sal Russo’s consulting firm Russo, Marsh and Associates

“People are in this country a long time and they are not legal. We have to get them legal in some way in a process that gets people legal that are here…We should do it because it’s the right thing. We need to reform immigration because we need a system that works,” Russo said.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3451032/posts?page=271#271


36 posted on 08/14/2016 8:22:01 AM PDT by AuntB (Trump is our Ben Franklin - Brilliant, Boisterous, Brave and ALL AMERICAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Ted Cruz. Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. Mitch McConnell


37 posted on 08/14/2016 8:25:30 AM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Tea Party ideals have existed for over at least 235 years.
There has never been a time in the history of the USA when the proper role and scope of the Federal government has not been contested, debated, etc.

In fact, the proper role and scope of government has been a topic of intense debate (and even wars) for centuries.

Tea party ideals were recently on display in the Brexit vote, which after all was a disagreement over big centralized government or smaller less centralized government.

So, no, the tea party ideals are not dead and never will be. There will always be people who believe in limited central government and subsidiarity ___ and there will always be people who want the biggest, most centralized government they can get. This battle will always be engaged.


38 posted on 08/14/2016 8:50:04 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence
Remember when any word which could remotely be associated with violence was proof that all conservatives were haters hell-bent on slaughter?

And now these autofellatory pajama-boy propagandist trolls openly speak of killing their political opponents and think that they deserve even further congratulations for using violent language to rub their opponents' noses in it?

Oh, and by the way. The Tea Party was killed by multiple uncharged, unprotected Federal Felonies by the IRS, including targeting political enemies and destroying email evidence despite a judge's order to preserve the evidence.

President Trump ought to use executive orders to relocate all those involved to a new Federal Paper-Processing facility in Point Barrow, Alaska.

39 posted on 08/14/2016 9:45:49 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

well said.


40 posted on 08/14/2016 9:46:48 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson