Posted on 10/09/2016 12:53:35 PM PDT by BuckeyeGOP
We all know how this is going down tonight. No matter who goes first.
DJT will probably offer a very heartfelt apology. In it he will most likely label his words as off the cuff and locker room but not excuse what he said.
HRC will answer with, (if not preemptively state), that it wasn't just words. What he said was describing and condoning sexual assault. I even would bet she takes the faux outrage to the extreme of demanding he drop out.
The faux theatrics from the rapist enabler will be rich. Could she even refuse to be on the same debate stage as him?? Ok, probably not that extreme, but expect nuclear faux outrage.
So, how does DJT respond?
’ ... i wish he’d just grow up ... ‘
Huh?
I’d say Trump already is grown up.
But the USA is juvenile. This is the nation where he lives.
Trump should:
1. Apologize.
2. Go on the offensive and remind voters that the election is about Hillary, Obama and their horrible records, and don’t allow Hillary to deflect attention away from the main issue which is the fraud that she is.
He could say he got the “grab ‘em” line from Hillary!..When your Secretary of State you can do anything...anything.
Group Prayers Up for Donald Trump!
‘I really think general public doesn’t want to go down memory lane.’
WHAT FREAKING MEMORY?
What memory?
What do voters remember about the Clintons?
Next to nothing.
I would apologize first, but then I would make a direct appeal to the public: look at how unfairly the media are treating this. They are intentionally repeating this ad nauseum to keep the negative stuff about Hillary out of the public eye. Not a word in the mainstream media about the stuff from Wikileaks.
I think that could work.
That said, this was all entirely predictable.
“Well, Anderson, at least you know I’m straight...which is more than I can say for you and Hillary.”
“Group Prayers Up for Donald Trump!”
Amen, Brother.
The older voters remember the impeachment and Monica. But true the younger ones don’t.
Here’s a hint of what he might bring up. This came from the Trump website ...
[based on wikileaks]
TOP 10 THINGS HILLARY DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3478305/posts
Right.
Hardly anyone knows about the tainted prison blood [which ties in perfectly with the recent report about watered down aids meds].
Hardly anyone knows about her brother selling a pardon to a crack dealer.
Or the porno Christmas tree.
She’s so vulnerable it’s insane.
I would find a topic that bernie fans and us can agree on. Somthing like opening up the lid on the entanglements between big banks and dc. Then i would lay out , in quiet tones, how you are gonna use the power of the president to expose it all.
Any finger pointing accusation Clinton makes toward Trump has her three fingers of accusation pointing back at her.
Trump needs to repeatedly point that out and give examples.
I have a feeling this is being staged in drips with the words first and then claims by women later. Perhaps even film footage like the hot mic situation.
“It happened 11 years ago. I have apologized for it. Let’s move on.”
Do it in his opening statement, effectively taking the topic off the board. But I would answer that it was at a time when I was a Democrat and since I found religion and the morality that goes along with it, I abhor that type of behavior. And I must add, that Bill Clinton’s behavior was clearly different as he committed crimes against women, which Hillary enabled.
Now, what is the first question Martha?
What on earth makes you think he hasn’t done that?
He definitely needs to have an answer ready when they try to blame Russia for trying to influence the election with the email leaks.
“If you had a daughter, would you allow Trump near her?”
There are plenty of beauty contestants who have been interviewed and they say he was a perfect gentleman.
Set narrative? The MSM has been attempting to set the narrative on him since he got in. They have used every trick in the book. You see what good that did.
I have apologized for comments I made to another man in a cab over a decade ago. I challenge my opponent to apologize to Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and others who suffered first at the hands of her husband and then suffered through threats and intimidation by private investigators, government officials, paid spinners, and so-called “journalists” all in an effort to scare them into remaining silent. Several of those women still live in fear.
I challenge my opponent to apologize to the families of those who died in Benghazi. First, because they did not receive security for which they asked over 600 times. Second, because she has publicly called the families liars. Third, because there was a window of opportunity to send help but help was not sent. And finally, for destroying evidence and being less than truthful under oath.
And I challenge my opponent to apologize for her own history of comments that demean minorities.
In my administration, if someone attempts to hide information with a private server, that person will be fired. If someone refuses to appear when given a subpoena to appear, that person will be fired. If someone pleads the 5th and refuses to cooperate with investigations, that person will be fired.
I have no idea. This post said “what if” so that’s my “what if”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.