Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan board may declare LGBT discrimination unlawful
The Mining Journal ^ | September 18, 2017 | David Eggert, The Associated Press

Posted on 09/18/2017 11:28:03 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

LANSING — A long-stalled movement to make it illegal to discriminate against LGBT people may gain traction — not in the Legislature but with a Michigan board that is being asked to declare that such discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations is already unlawful under state law.

The Michigan Civil Rights Commission will meet today to consider the request after two months of receiving public feedback, including roughly 300 comments. The interpretive statement, if issued, would say that discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is a form of sex discrimination outlawed under the state’s 1976 civil rights law.

The request from LGBT rights group Equality Michigan has revived a political fight between Democrats and Republicans in the GOP-controlled Legislature who have been at odds over expanding civil rights protections for LGBT citizens. Outside allies also have offered sharply different views on the commission’s responsibility and authority in the wake of federal rulings declaring LGBT-based discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations is forbidden.....

(Excerpt) Read more at miningjournal.net ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: democrats; homosexualagenda; michigan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2017 11:28:04 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Unelected, unaccountable board.


2 posted on 09/18/2017 11:30:06 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, LGBTs should not be discriminating against anyone.

Oh wait . . .


3 posted on 09/18/2017 11:31:14 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The flip side to "free of association" is "freedom of disassociation". Attack one and the other is caught in the fire. I am free to associate with the organizations I choose. I am not free to demand they associate with me. The LGBT(IQCAPGNGFNBA) crowd do not understand basic American Civics.


4 posted on 09/18/2017 11:33:57 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Martin Luther King must be ready to rise from his grave and punch out some folks. ;-)


5 posted on 09/18/2017 11:36:37 AM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Effectively - the leftists have established a class based society.
White males are the only group not protected and, therefore, can be discriminated against and cannot have special dispensation made for.

Slicing down the line - protected classes have more power than religious organizations as civil rights don’t protect organizations - just individuals - ergo civil rights trump constitutional law like the first amendment and freedom of religion.

Add hate crimes to this (which, again, only apply to protected classes) and the first amendments freedom of speech is trumped as well as the 4th amendment (with prop 8’s donations made public because it opposing it was a “hate crime”)

We are no longer a free country.


6 posted on 09/18/2017 11:43:13 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Unelected, unaccountable board.

That's how democrats do it.

7 posted on 09/18/2017 11:46:32 AM PDT by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

More fools trying to act PC.


8 posted on 09/18/2017 11:48:31 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What is “sexual orientation?”

Is the transgender T a sexual orientation or is it something else?

Are L, G, and B the only “sexual orientations” receiving protection in a potential regulation or law?

Are there other “sexual orientations” other than L, G, and B?

Do these receive protections?

Does “discrimination on the basis of” refer only to “discrimination against” or does it also mean “discrimination in support of?”

If a government agency celebrates, say, the condition of T, does that constitute a violation of “discrimination on the basis of” law?


9 posted on 09/18/2017 11:49:08 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Attack the LGayBiTrans issue head on with the Male to Male sex of the “G” and don’t let up and don’t let them change the subject.
The Centers for Disease Control warn against male to male sex and consider it a deadly transaction. Just focus on this one issue and ask the LGBT how they can support the spreading of disease. Do not let them change the subject. Attack the weak point in the L G B T that they have ZERO defense of. If the G is spreading disease why support their agenda? From this defense point you force them to reveal the truth of thier deadly lifestyle.


10 posted on 09/18/2017 11:49:53 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So how do you decide who is gay?


11 posted on 09/18/2017 11:51:58 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

SCIENCE DENIERS!!


12 posted on 09/18/2017 11:52:53 AM PDT by eyeamok (Idle hands are the Devil's workshop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Forcing people to accept what your religion may not accept ,,, now that sounds fair enough !


13 posted on 09/18/2017 11:53:15 AM PDT by Lionheartusa1 ()-: There is nothing democratic about the democrat party :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Ain’t that the truth.


14 posted on 09/18/2017 12:00:29 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This will go over well in Dearborn, heh.


15 posted on 09/18/2017 12:05:53 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (CNN IS ISIS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It would be much better to make LGBT illegal.


16 posted on 09/18/2017 12:06:16 PM PDT by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not as if any pol/judge/lawyer (but I repeat myself) can noodle, but *clear* violation of 1st A. Rights: association.

Whom one wishes to associate with (or not) = discrimination.
Eat out or in = discriminating.
WHERE to eat out = discriminating.

These HRO (human ‘rights’ ordinances) create special-rights for one group over another, suppressing inalienable Rights.


17 posted on 09/18/2017 12:08:09 PM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

To know who rules over you, seek those whom you cannot criticize.


18 posted on 09/18/2017 12:08:41 PM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan says it’s gotten more than 500 complaints of LGBT discrimination in employment, housing, education and public accommodations in the past 17 years.”

With all the hundreds of “gay” hoaxes perpetrated over that same period of time, the veracity of their claims is kind of tarnished.


19 posted on 09/18/2017 12:17:18 PM PDT by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sipow

No person is illegal, only conduct is.


20 posted on 09/18/2017 12:18:01 PM PDT by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson