Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here is the real reason McConnell is afraid of a Moore win-Blocking ProForma Recess
https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/15831/u-s-senate-can-the-minority-party-maintain-a-pro-forma-session-and-refuse-to-r ^

Posted on 11/30/2017 10:13:57 AM PST by Be Careful

Pro-Forma Recess---"If you look at the Senate proceedings, you can see that at times the senate calls for adjournment by unanimous consent. Under this circumstance, then even one person can object and prevent the adjournment."

(Excerpt) Read more at politics.stackexchange.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2017 10:13:57 AM PST by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

So the real problem is that Moore might make the Senate majority actually govern like a majority?


2 posted on 11/30/2017 10:18:40 AM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

Not sure you’re correct, but it’s an interesting theory.


3 posted on 11/30/2017 10:29:03 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

Let’s be clear? Moore will be opposed to a “pro-forma” recess and McConnell would allow it, or is it the other way around???

It would seem with a Moore win (which I expect) the Dim minority could not get a “pro-forma” recess. So McConnell wants Moore to lose, so the Dims could get a “pro-forma” recess and block Trump recess appointments??


4 posted on 11/30/2017 10:29:39 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful
McConnell knows he has a bunch of squishy republicans in the Senate (maybe you call them RINOs, GOPe, Swampers, NeverTrumpers, Deep State, etc).

I think he fears they will gum up the works and Mitch will get burnt for having the (on paper) majority and still being unable to get anything passed.

Mitch is thinking maybe he's not up to the task. Much easier, and pays the same, to let the Dems lead instead. In the short run, it's less effort to give up without trying, isn't it?

That's how you squander an 8-year window for real change.

5 posted on 11/30/2017 10:47:45 AM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful

I hear Jethro Tull’s “Locomotive Breath” when I think of Mitch “Yertle” McConnell trying to keep the US Senate Train on the tracks, while it’s inexorably careening out of control. Except it’s not “old Charlie” who is his nemesis:

In the shuffling madness
Of the locomotive breath,
Runs the all, time loser,
Headlong to his death
He feels the piston scraping
Steam breaking on his brow
Old Charlie stole the handle and
The train it won’t stop going
No way to slow down
He sees his children jumping off
At stations, one by one
His woman and his best friend
In bed and having fun
He’s crawling down the corridor
On his hands and knees
Old Charlie stole the handle and
The train it won’t stop going
No way to slow down
He hears the silence howling
Catches angels as they fall
And the all-time winner
Has got him by the balls


6 posted on 11/30/2017 10:53:04 AM PST by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Pro Forma Session: From the Latin, meaning “as a matter of form,” a pro forma session is a brief meeting of the Senate, often only a few minutes in duration.

If I recall correctly, they appoint a Senator to show up, gavel open the session, say something for the record. and then close the session. My understanding is that Moore will object to this. Then they have to actually stay in session or they all go home.

7 posted on 11/30/2017 11:05:03 AM PST by NutsOnYew (If the world was perfect, it wouldn't be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NutsOnYew

Pretty much. I’m confident to say that the GOPe approached him before he ran and when he said FU to the swamp creatures, that’s when they decided to destroy him. When you’re own party throws everything at you to quit, you know something big is up. It didnt work with Trump though but he’s the exception.


8 posted on 11/30/2017 11:25:16 AM PST by beergarden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Yes, if Moore blocks the pro forma, then they have to actually go on recess if they want a vacation, and then Trump can make appointments. Or they can just stay there and never have a vacation.


9 posted on 11/30/2017 11:27:45 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NutsOnYew
"My understanding is that Moore will object to this. Then they have to actually stay in session or they all go home."

As I understand it he will request a vote for recess so that they can't use pro-forma as a block against recess appointments the same trick that phuckir Harry Reid came up to stop GWB from using the Recess Appointments.

Think a huge slate of Judges getting appointed by PDJT when they are on Christmas Break, that is what in part the Moore Victory is about, he ungums the works, the swamp wants it murky so your feet are forever stuck in the mud.

10 posted on 11/30/2017 11:28:23 AM PST by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry of Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

The part that I had hoped to post was not well-curated...but the general gist is that one person can put a stick in everyone’s spokes.....Roy Moore would be that stick in the spokes.


11 posted on 11/30/2017 11:40:53 AM PST by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

One of my favorites!


12 posted on 11/30/2017 11:47:59 AM PST by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
"Think a huge slate of Judges getting appointed by PDJT when they are on Christmas Break ..."

Normally appointments for federal judge are for life. Aren't recess appointments only effective until the end of the next session of Congress? I don't see much value in such appointments; at least not for judges.

13 posted on 11/30/2017 11:53:24 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

We get them for three years and they can still be confirmed for permanent placement during that time. The judges can each hand down a few decisions and the Senate will have at least a true record as to how these judges will perform before permanent confirmation.


14 posted on 11/30/2017 11:59:32 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Men and Devils can't out-"alinsksy" God! He knows where "all the bodies are buried!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NutsOnYew

I seem to recall that if no one objects then a pro forma session can be done on a “voice vote”.

If one representative votes no, then to pass this measure you have to have a “recorded vote”.

Must scare the heck out of the RINOs and GOPe to be thinking about have to answer to the folks back home becasue they are on the record to block the President’s use of recess appointments.


15 posted on 11/30/2017 12:00:13 PM PST by lowbuck (The Blue Card (US Passport) Don't leave home without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NutsOnYew
If Moore does do this and blocks a pro-forma recess, then Constitutionally, both chambers must agree to recess within three days of each other before a recess can actually occur.

This brings the House into the equation, and might result in fewer recesses overall.

-PJ

16 posted on 11/30/2017 12:10:26 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: William Tell; LucyT; taildragger
McConnell has already yielded on the Judges--we are confirming judges in record numbers. Grassley has eliminated the blue slip reservation and Judiciary is approving judges and is expected to continue.

The real issue is other appointments--Trump may have as many as several thousand non-judicial PAS (Presidential appointment Senate Confirmation) appointments on which the Senate is standing still to prevent him from implementing his agenda--those people all get in on recess appointments.

17 posted on 11/30/2017 12:47:42 PM PST by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful
Under this circumstance, then even one person can object and prevent the adjournment.

That is completely wrong. Think about it, if a unanimous vote was needed to recess than the Senate would be in permanent session. McConnell can recess the Senate and Schumer can call for pro-forma sessions to keep Trump from making recess appointments.

18 posted on 11/30/2017 12:55:50 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
Normally appointments for federal judge are for life. Aren't recess appointments only effective until the end of the next session of Congress? I don't see much value in such appointments; at least not for judges.

Mainly it would be good to clear away the backlog of executive appointments. Appointing a bunch of judges via recess appointment gives us the advantage of having a whole bunch of conservative judges issuing decisions over the next year.

19 posted on 11/30/2017 1:04:43 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
If Moore does do this and blocks a pro-forma recess, then Constitutionally, both chambers must agree to recess within three days of each other before a recess can actually occur.

Article II, section 3, on the powers of the President: He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;

20 posted on 11/30/2017 1:09:15 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson