Posted on 04/26/2021 11:36:58 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
THIS is the gateway to the New Normal and the Great Reset
Last week, I published Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s devastating critique of the claim that SARS-CoV-2 has been discovered.
Dr. Kaufman offered a blow-by-blow analysis of a typical description of “virus-isolation.” He showed that no such isolation has occurred.
In other words, “here it is,” “we found a new virus”—- false. Unsupportable. Fraudulent.
I’m pro-vax to a point. The amount of intentional, hysterical BS scaring people BOTH ways, I agree is unbelievable. When I was part of the U2 program, we had a simple motto - In God We Trust, All Others We Monitor.
I have never seen so many people style themselves as experts on things they clearly know nothing about. it would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic. I long for a return to rational discussion. Enjoy your day it’s a beautiful spring outside away from the hysteria. Without a mask on!
Sure thing. SARS-CoV-2 Genome Browser. Good enough?
Ok, thanks. Let me check it out
Why would I bill somebody who has demonstrated themselves insane?
Because you don’t have the decoded sequence in your hands, you believe it does not exist.
Yet it is being decoded anew every day as surveillance occurs to keep track of the variants.
I suppose EVERYONE is lying about that, right?
You should be careful, soon everyone will be lying about YOU personally, and then you’ll really have something to worry about.
Or, do they haunt you already?
“Of course, both Pfizer and Moderna were granted total immunity from any liability for potential side effects of their vaccines.”
As every vaccine maker in the US is, no matter the vaccine.
“Good enough?”
It will not be for the insane.
They believe what they believe and no outside information will be given credence.
We’ll see...
No, not *quite* good enough.
1) what is the original source for the entries? (country)
2) what is the original source for the entries? (primary source experiment on raw material, or given the sequence by someone else)
3) Are there various families of mutations which have been characterized? Are there specific stretches (either codons or resultant proteins/peptides coded for) which are the primary loci of differentiation?
Answer those, and it’ll give a better idea how reliable the information in that link is.
No, it was your smug sarcasm that offended me.
And I’ll take this opportunity to apologize for my own smug sarcasm.
I get off kilter when presented with fantastic beliefs.
The information you’re asking for is sitting there right at the link. You just refuse to look at it.
Here’s an example of one of their linked sources: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_045512.2
Keep dancin’!
But from your link, about the 1st 30k bases were sequenced in Chy-na.
The erratum is merely an incorrect grant number. Which is one of the questions answered, anyway.
True , but they don’t have blanket immunity. In the case of a defective product, US Vaccine makers would still be liable, no?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.