Dem Who Challenged 2016 Election Says People ‘Willing to Deny Results of a Clear Election’ Shouldn’t Run in an Election

CNS News ^ | 11/03/2022 | CRAIG MILLWARD

[DFG]

Following President Joe Biden’s speech Wednesday, which the White House dubbed “Standing up for Democracy,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) declared that “If someone is willing to deny the clear results of an election, they shouldn't be running in an election.”

But, on January 6, 2017, Raskin contested the results of the 2016 presidential election, in remarks on the House floor:

“I have an objection because 10 of the 29 electoral votes cast by Florida were cast by electors not lawfully certified, because they violated Florida’s prohibition against dual office holding.”

Then-Vice President Joe Biden denied Raskin’s challenge, noting it was not signed by a member of the House of Representatives and a senator.

[Delta 21]

Well, that’s kind of, like, your opinion, man.

[FlingWingFlyer]

RatSkin again? That idiot is a real PITA.

[Jess Kitting]

"If someone is willing to deny the clear results of an election, they shouldn't be running in an election."

Wish they could have told that to chief election denier, Stacy Abrams.

We'll see who's denying the clear election results come Nov. 9.

[Signalman]

Raskin is a Democrat and a hypocrite.
But, I repeat myself.

[neverevergiveup]

You work for us pinhead. Shut-up and do the bidding of your constituents. You and the rest of your political clown posse are dangerously inept and should never be allowed to give advice - just take advice. That's what your job is. You're a servant of the people. Start acting like one and do your job.

[ConservativeInPA]

Reality denier.

[chopperk]

What rock has clown Raskin been living under. No one cares about his opinion. He talks like a communist making statements above his pay grade.

[hflynn]

looks like the Democratic Party was just canceled.

[Bookshelf]

Raskin, like his father, is a Marxist.