Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions about Limbaugh

Posted on 09/12/2005 7:29:39 PM PDT by sine_nomine

I was doing a routine search about the life of Rush Limbaugh. I ran into some wild accusations. I do not want to repeat them. I was shocked because the statements were new to me.

I am wondering if others have run into these and what they think. Here is one link: http://pssht.com/biography/rush_limbaugh.html

I am a paleo-conservative, not a DU troll. I have read FR for almost 7 years and post often.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2soon2zot; herekittykitty; limbaugh; meow; nukemenow; nukemeplease; sinenomineisadouche; thinkallaretrolls; troll; vikingkitties; youidiots; zot; zotmehard; zotmeharder; zotmenow; zotsfortots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-155 next last
To: Hunble
Woofie and I are "old farts"

Gee Thanks

81 posted on 09/12/2005 8:03:48 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: sine_nomine

I got my doubts about this post , but this is worth repeating:



Posted by sine_nomine to DumpsterDiver
On News/Activism 09/12/2005 10:18:58 PM EDT · 39 of 45


The Caro biographies paint a stark portrait of the mad emperor. He was faithless to everyone, especially his friends.

Worst presidents ever for the damage they did:
1. LBJ (Viet Nam, diplomacy, the welfare state, treasonous cabinet members
2. Clinton (surrender to terror, possible alliances with terrorists, you know the rest)
3. FDR (welfare state, surrender of Eastern Europe to the communists, welcoming communists into government)
4. Carter (for giving us Iran) but forgiven for giving us Reagan.


82 posted on 09/12/2005 8:04:04 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Obviously teasing, but it is nice to see someone posting from the "Senior citizen class" of Free Republic.


83 posted on 09/12/2005 8:05:55 PM PDT by Hunble (is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sine_nomine
Not many of these "facts" check out. For instance, the web page cited as evidence for the alleged gay relationship is written about the claims of a man who, in 2003, was 46 years old. This man claims to have taken college classes with Limbaugh in 1971. This man would have been 15 years old when he was in college. Possible? Perhaps. Unlikely? Most certainly.

Anyway, any legitimate source citing Marta would not have linked her name to a dictionary page definition of 'whiskers' and then offer NO proof, evidence of basis of the divorce reasons. Additionally, Smokinggun.com should have been able to come up with Rush's arrest record since that ought to be public information.

In short, anyone can write anything they want but it doesn't mean a thing. The MSM does this every single day of the week and they call it "journalism." Personally, I wouldn't care if Rush was as queer as a three dollar bill - at least he loves this country and has scruples these freaks will never grasp or understand. In my book, that's good enough.
84 posted on 09/12/2005 8:06:14 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Do you know Landru, Brother?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sipicaknobius

a cya disclaimer intended to conceal true intention?


85 posted on 09/12/2005 8:06:34 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

Isn't rush supposed to be dead before the homosexuals try and claim the "lifestyle."


86 posted on 09/12/2005 8:07:38 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

sleeper troll?


87 posted on 09/12/2005 8:07:50 PM PDT by hope (I fight poverty daily...I work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

Its ok ...but the truth hurts...my New Years resolutions these days are to keep breathing


88 posted on 09/12/2005 8:08:36 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: planekT

Actually genius. Somewhere here during the election there was a post of IQ's and he is up there.


89 posted on 09/12/2005 8:09:57 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Actually spanalot, there is a history of good posts. If anything, I was simply trying to verify that this was not a DU troll.

Your support is recognized and respected, and hopefully, I have not insulted anyone.


90 posted on 09/12/2005 8:10:17 PM PDT by Hunble (is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

I can tell you who trixie is, can you tell me who LittleLulu is?


91 posted on 09/12/2005 8:12:05 PM PDT by dinasour (Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Don't tell anyone where my gold is!


92 posted on 09/12/2005 8:12:09 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Most of the posts above are hysterical ad hominem attacks, based on the assumption that anyone asking about this would be from the Dark Side.

It's funny that people who cannot write good English also make up definitions for "paleo." Try - ancient, as opposed to neo, for new.

I think Rush Limbaugh is pretty good. I often listen to him. He definitely saved AM radio and paved the way for many other conservative hosts. He is usually right about the issues. Obviously there is a multi-pronged effort to get at him and others.

The site in question poses as a parody site but is not that at all. The best way to refute false claims is with the facts.


93 posted on 09/12/2005 8:13:03 PM PDT by sine_nomine (Protect the weakest of the weak - the unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

I thought Rush said he never went to college.


94 posted on 09/12/2005 8:13:10 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sine_nomine

Says Rush draft-dodged the Vietnam war. He was under age during most of it, having been born in 1951.The rest is exaggerated or lies.And who wants to accept the writer's characterization of Limbaugh fans or conservatives? And what rise of Al Franken?


95 posted on 09/12/2005 8:13:15 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Blogworthy
Looks like a bunch of libel to me. How do they get by with it?

Same reason the tabloids can. The courts have basically said that for "public figures" (i.e. people who are famous), the only way libel can be found is if there is a "reckless disregard for the truth" that significantly damage the reputation of the person involved.

The plaintiff would have to proof that the accuser knew the allegations were false, did so anyway out of some personal hate and that the accused suffered damages as a result of the libel.

Most celebrities also know that the cost of fighting such rumors/charges in court only lend credibility to the rumors/charges ("why else would they fight them?" some argue) and broaden the circulation of the rumors/charges more than the original accusation circulated.

Let's say, for example, that it is published that a white southern congressman uses the N-word frequently in public. It's a total lie but if the congressman chooses to sue, then it becomes a "news item" and now the charge gains wider circulation and credibility than if the congressman just ignores the charge or calls it "baseless" if someone asks.

Their attornies and handlers will usually tell them it isn't worth fighting the lie in court and there is always the chance that a jury won't be pursuaded that the publisher printed the lie "with malice aforethought".

Think of all the awful things said about the president. That he wants black people to die, that he knowingly lied about WMDs, etc. because they know Bush can't really fight the charges. Your First Amendment at work, folks.

96 posted on 09/12/2005 8:13:38 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (RIP New Orleans 1718-2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sine_nomine

I heard he doesn't care about black quarterbacks! LOL!


97 posted on 09/12/2005 8:13:50 PM PDT by buckeyesrule (Go Buck! Beat San Diego State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sine_nomine

IBTZ... bye troll


98 posted on 09/12/2005 8:13:59 PM PDT by mysto ("I am ZOT proof" --- famous last words of a troll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

He may be a troll or he may just be dumb as a post.
(I know that's redundant.)


99 posted on 09/12/2005 8:14:07 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

He's a gem in a box of shiny rocks.


100 posted on 09/12/2005 8:14:41 PM PDT by planekT (What a mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson