Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Man Creates Engine That Consumes No Fuel;
The National Tattler ^ | 7/1/73 | Tom Valentine

Posted on 04/22/2006 2:09:18 AM PDT by BlueSky194

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: maineman

I once did the software for one of those.


81 posted on 04/22/2006 5:21:02 AM PDT by Erasmus (Eat beef. Someone has to control the cow population!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Drango
...I got some beachfront property in Arizona that you might be interested in. Do you take Paypal?

I'll have you know... we have beach front property in Arizona.

82 posted on 04/22/2006 5:21:36 AM PDT by quin (when running naked in the desert, ya gotta watch out for the pricks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RavenATB
Me too. But, I built my first house in 1989, for $52 a square foot, including the lot. I build my fourth home two years ago, for $135 a square foot, and that house is currently worth about twice what I paid for it...or, about $270 a square foot.

BTTT

Now, do the same math with food, clothing, medical costs, insurance, taxes, wages, popcorn, telephones, water, etc. etc.

The whole thing is another silly "created" crisis to get the media and politicians through the long boring summer months.

83 posted on 04/22/2006 5:25:10 AM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pusterfuss
While we are at it, make the highways out of rubber so neither they nor your tires would wear out.:) Now there's a use for all those discarded old tires!

Arizona uses old tires to rubberize it's metro freeways... it's fracken awesome.

84 posted on 04/22/2006 5:25:32 AM PDT by quin (when running naked in the desert, ya gotta watch out for the pricks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

"I thinkd Colonel Sanders was in on it.

Darn. Forgot him...and Elvis too."

And Bruce Lee. Don't forget Bruce Lee.


85 posted on 04/22/2006 5:30:39 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (To Serve Man......It's a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194

There are suckers born every minute.


86 posted on 04/22/2006 5:30:42 AM PDT by BadAndy (Islam is a religion of submission. YOUR submission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
And Bruce Lee. Don't forget Bruce Lee.
That's right. He provides the security that prevents the evil oil companies from stealing the invention. ;-)
87 posted on 04/22/2006 5:35:44 AM PDT by peyton randolph (Time for an electoral revolution where the ballot box is the guillotine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
You forgot the Illuminati.

He didn't forget.....everytime he typed it, it suspiciously disappeared off his screen..................

88 posted on 04/22/2006 5:46:11 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
I'm tempted to put my life savings into this invention but I'm holding off for now.
You see, my neighbor is working on special eyeglasses that enable the wearer to see through women's clothing. Apparently, it works by splitting polarized light into it's three major components which effectively makes material objects, such as clothing, transparent.
He tells me that has big money behind him, including a consortium headed by Bill Clinton, but I'm still hoping he'll let me invest.
89 posted on 04/22/2006 5:53:49 AM PDT by finnigan2 (OUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ketelone
Wow... and thats why its being reported in the "National Tattler"

LOL! Yeah, but how does Bat Boy figure into all this?

90 posted on 04/22/2006 5:55:24 AM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

91 posted on 04/22/2006 6:10:35 AM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Anyone who did dropped 10 IQ points right there....

LOL!

92 posted on 04/22/2006 6:12:13 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194

Stories about revolutionary dicoveries about auto engines or energy sources appear every six months or whenever there is a spike in oil prices.

Have you ever seen one of these products come to market? The Oil companies buy them off and kill the project?

Surely there is ONE inventor out there who will be true to his patent and make his own millions. Or maybe ONE automaker that can see a ripe plum in new technology?

Or maybe the tabloid press will find a new inventor in six months.


93 posted on 04/22/2006 6:15:15 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194

bump for later


94 posted on 04/22/2006 6:25:55 AM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194
I want Discovery Channel's Mythbusters program to look at this engine and see if they can actually make it work.
95 posted on 04/22/2006 6:44:04 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194
I got as far as "...former Volkswagen mechanic..."
96 posted on 04/22/2006 6:52:56 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
"There are positive particles in the wiring and all mass for that matter, and the configuration of the electron shell determines a material's conductivity, but electricity is the movement of electrons, which are purely negative."

True. I caught that part as well. A number of capacitors in series, however, might be more efficient for generating power from a given potential than a steady stream of electrons using a standard brush-style motor. I can't recall enough electrical theory to work it out.

97 posted on 04/22/2006 6:56:11 AM PDT by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194

98 posted on 04/22/2006 7:06:43 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

The wankle engine is a darn efficient design. It is NOT a perpetual motion machine. It is an engine.

Further, it is a production engine in Mazda cars. At one point there were aircraft engines as well.

The problem with the rotary engine is sealing. It is a highly effective use of motion and the moving parts are limited, but the area of sealed surfaces is very high.


99 posted on 04/22/2006 7:10:57 AM PDT by laxcoach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194

LOL! Is this an April Fool's joke? Or just another of the Fools who have been "had" by con-men claiming perpetual motion machines since the Middle Ages.


100 posted on 04/22/2006 7:13:35 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson