Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pit bulls shot to death after attack on cow (sad picture of mother cow, protecting it's calf)
ajc.com ^ | 05/24/06 | Mark Davis

Posted on 05/24/2006 8:42:10 AM PDT by rawhide

Cecil Wallace awoke about 4:30 a.m. Saturday to the bawling of cows and the howling of dogs. The Buford farmer grabbed his shotgun and went running out the back door.

His son and next-door neighbor, Kenneth Wallace, also jarred awake — also carrying a shotgun — joined him. Father and son ran toward the pasture...

...Reaching the pasture, the Wallaces saw a cow, bloodied and torn, its calf standing nearby. As they approached the animal, according to reports, two dogs came running towards them.

Kenneth Wallace raised his 12-gauge. Boom! The larger dog hit the dirt, howling. Wallace fired again, and the dog was quiet.

The female kept coming. Kenneth Wallace fired a third time, the blast echoing along the darkened reaches of Bart Johnson Road.

The Wallaces dragged the dogs' bodies aside and tended to the cow, Betsy. She looked bad — right ear torn off, the left shredded like paper. Her nose was ripped and torn. Two teeth were knocked loose. Not long after daybreak, Cecil Wallace took Betsy to a Cumming veterinarian, who prescribed painkillers and antibiotics for the Angus/Hereford cross.

"She's still in bad shape," Cecil Wallace, 73, said Tuesday. "She tries to eat, but she can't; her mouth's too sore."

Animal control officers have cited one dog owner with failing to have the animal on a leash.. They also charged the owner with violating the county's vicious-animal ordinance, which requires owners of a dangerous dog or cat to have it muzzled whenever the animal is off the owner's property.

Meghan Martin, who lives near the Wallaces, said she is the owner whom officers cited...p>

When I went to sleep, my dog was in bed with me," she said. A roommate let out her dog, plus a friend's pit bull, Martin said...

(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...


TOPICS: Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: bsl; calf; cow; dogofpeace; maul; pitbull; pitbulls; rdo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-418 next last
To: GMMAC

Okay. I would like to know the proper name of these so-called pit bulls. I was often defending them, because the ones I had known were very nice dogs. My children would play with the dog next door and so would my labrador. Then, he started jumping the fence out of his yard. He would always come back bloodied. Last December he came back after two weeks. One of the first things he did was attack a little dog walking down the sidewalk. I had to call animal control and contact the owner of the dead little dog. Animal control talked to my neighbor, but wouldn't do anything about the dog unless he hurts a person. Have heard he had killed one other dog on another street and almost killed another. Until recently he had been chained up. He's been off the chain less and less. He still is very friendly to my dog (we have a chain link fence), but I do not trust him.


41 posted on 05/24/2006 3:20:51 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
"Now which breed has a worse mauling record than APBT's?"

Unless you know of statistics backed up by 'doggie dna tests', there's no valid answer to your question. Any I've seen lump together many supposedly 'similar' breeds as well as dogs which, in someone's judgement, look a certain way.

Additionally, I'm unaware of any which correlate numbers of attacks with the overall numbers out there of the particular type of dog.

As examples, are German Shepherds - which rank fairly high on some lists - really a verifiable menace or are there simply a lot of them out there?

An average Akita is roughly twice the size of most 'pit bull' type dogs and could likely easily eat one for breakfast. They come up on some lists of dangerous dogs but not all, because there's not really that many of them around.

Again, the more such reasonable questions that can be raised, seemingly, the more valid cause there is to be using governmental resources to go after specific negligent dog owners.

Ever notice how often, after an attack by any sort of dog, the neighbors and/or witnesses have stories to tell about there having been a long-standing problem with the dog's owner which the authorities did nothing to address? I doubt all that many dog attacks by any breed come out of a clear blue sky.
42 posted on 05/24/2006 3:23:40 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

"Of course anyone who knows dogs knows that this is ridiculous. Herding dogs have certain innate behaviors, as do retrievers, spaniels, pointers, and so on. Unfortunately, so do Pit Bulls and Presas and so on. "

Sure, but what makes a herder a herder, and a retriever a retriever, are those traits - visual or behavioral. If a dog looks like retriever and acts like a retriever, it's a retriever because we say it's a retriever.
It isn't not a retriever because the AKC doesn't define it as a retriever. They're a business, after all, with a strong economic interest in limiting the breed designations to their papers.

Remember the big picture of my comment that "a dog is a dog". I was replying to some posts that said that there is no such thing as a pit bull, because it is not an AKC or CKC recognized breed. So, my comment was aimed at the assertion of authority to define what a breed is reposes with any private club. For their purposes, sure, but not for legal and public safety purposes. They have no pit bull designation, but there are clearly pit bulls. And they clearly have a higher propensity to be involved in vicious mauling incidents than most other dogs in our neck of the woods.

So, it makes sense to me that pit bulls need to be watched more closely and treated with greater circumspection. We CAN'T pretend that a dog is a dog when we're exposing children to dogs. Because you're right, it's not true.
That the AKC and CKC say there's no such thing as a pit bull is probably the best piece of evidence I can give for my point that these private clubs have no authority to define breeds or anything else about their hobby, other than for the purposes of what they do in their club. As far as society goes, there is too such a thing as a pit bull, and it's determined by appearance. Dogs that look like that tend to be on the hit-list of bad actors more often, so they bear watching.

I wouldn't prohibit them.
But I would treat a mauling by a dangerous breed to be criminal negligence by the owner. Keep a dog like that, IF it attacks somebody, you've done the same thing as have an attractive nuisance next to an open pit in your yard: some kid gets broken, and you're a criminal.


43 posted on 05/24/2006 3:25:02 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

So, are you really saying "A dog is a dog"?

Or is there such a thing as a breed?
And does breed matter?

If you say there's such a thing as breed, what is that BASED on, other than appearance and behavior? Those are subjective standards. There's no truly objective standard for breed differentiation.


44 posted on 05/24/2006 3:31:16 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Holy cow!

Nice picture.


45 posted on 05/24/2006 3:32:00 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Oh I see....only qualified expert Pit Bull owners can identify Pit Bulls, despite the fact that Pits are overepresented in Animal control visits, in the shelters and being shot by police. The authorities are wholly unfamiliar with them.

It's a mythical problem and everyone should run out a buy a Pit Bull...Are you a breeder btw?


46 posted on 05/24/2006 3:32:09 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy
He's been off the chain less and less. He still is very friendly to my dog (we have a chain link fence), but I do not trust him.

Find him when he's out of his yard and shoot him. Tell the cops you were in fear for your life.

That dog will attack your dog or you. Don't take the chance.

47 posted on 05/24/2006 3:34:03 PM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Doggie DNA tests won't give you an objective differentiation of breeds either.


48 posted on 05/24/2006 3:34:23 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy
A farmer friend of mine swears by this remedy for aggressive dogs, when they must be disposed of without using poison or a gun. ( He uses it on unleashed dogs that come on to his farm,in our town where there is a strict leash law to protect farmers and our deer herd).

Take an ordinary brand new cleaning sponge, soak it in meat gravy , and then compress that sucker into the smallest container you can, down to the size of a golf ball.

Stick it in the freezer overnight.

Run a little warm water on the container, slide out that compressed frozen sponge and chuck it over the fence in the dark,(two or three are better and quicker than one but also more suspicious)

In a week you will have no more dog problem in the neighborhood, and most owners and vets will think the dog just ate the sponge, if they are ever discovered.

My farmer friend says the owner should bury them, which is why he won't shoot them. The trespassing dogs usually swallow the frozen sponge in one gulp.

49 posted on 05/24/2006 3:36:47 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

The AKC doesn't register APBT's because they wanted nothing to do with them. The history on them is a little confusing and the advocates like to exploit the confusion.

A good read about the registering organizations here:

http://dogs.about.com/cs/breedprofiles/a/pitbull_history.htm


50 posted on 05/24/2006 3:46:40 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
Glad you like it! The sacred cow is a common site in Vermont, but no one who has tried to milk her has been successful yet, even our holiest of preists , preachers and rabis.

I'm sure there is a joke in here soomewhere waiting to get out. Three holy men were walking down the raod when they spotted a Holy Cow. When the minister tried to milk her, only water came out....etc.

51 posted on 05/24/2006 3:48:50 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Find him when he's out of his yard and shoot him. Tell the cops you were in fear for your life.

So far, he's been good about not leaving his yard. Last week some chihuahuas walked into his yard and my son was sure he was going to attack one so ran outside. The dog left them alone and went back to his own business after he saw my son run out.

52 posted on 05/24/2006 3:53:42 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
"It's a mythical problem and everyone should run out a buy a Pit Bull...Are you a breeder btw?"

No to both:
As stated earlier above, I'm a cat owner (who hasn't even had a dog since I was a kid well over 40 years ago).
My position is simply that law-abiding conscientious people have a crystal clear right to possess any sort of dog they wish while the state has every right to go after those who - especially willfully and/or negligently! - cross the line between liberty & license.

I don't own any guns either but, as a philosophical conservative, I absolutely endorse gun-owners rights on precisely the sane basis.

To me, everyone on this thread who is attacking the countless responsible dog-owners with well cared for and well trained pets merely to satisfy a totally justifiable urge to punish a small negligent minority is lowering themselves to the level of knee-jerk liberals who'd arbitrarily take away their guns.
53 posted on 05/24/2006 4:17:03 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

I'd outlaw em.

Can't compare them to guns.

More like loose cannons.


54 posted on 05/24/2006 4:32:10 PM PDT by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

Or Hand grenades....


55 posted on 05/24/2006 4:50:24 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

56 posted on 05/24/2006 5:42:36 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

I am so sick of this. First of all, AKC NEVER wanted "nothing to do with pit bulls". They simply changed the name to American Staffordshire Terrier to make it sound better. It wasn't their history they were worried about, as the dogs were WELL FREAKIN KNOWN for being very human friendly. They were worried about idiots like you guys who absolutely cannot LEARN! There is so much evidence out there that totally proves you wrong, yet in the face of it, here you are with your nonsense again!

A couple lab mixes killed a lady the other day, and guess what! No responses to that thread! Hmmm.. I wonder why. Perhaps YOU ALL WANT TO ACT LIKE IT NEVER HAPPENS!

And as for the post that somehow pit bulls attack MORE OFTEN than cocker spaniels, ABSOLUTELY WRONG. Cockers, Labs, and Goldens are the TOP THREE that attack most often. They just aren't as physically strong.

And another thing. I really do feel bad for the cow, but what do you expect from a breed whose original purpose, before dog fighting, was to bait bulls?? Where did you all think the name came from?? Never in their history have they been bred for human aggression, and you can talk till you're blue in the face, but the facts prove it.


57 posted on 05/24/2006 5:58:51 PM PDT by solosmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: solosmoke

Testify sister !!!
(an' slap all them dog hatin' crypto-liberals agin !!!)

58 posted on 05/24/2006 6:22:15 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: solosmoke

"And another thing. I really do feel bad for the cow, but what do you expect from a breed whose original purpose, before dog fighting, was to bait bulls?? Where did you all think the name came from??"

I really do feel bad for other dogs and people when the Bull baiting genes kick in.


WELL FREAKIN KNOWN for being friendly...that's a good one!!!


59 posted on 05/24/2006 6:26:08 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
Most people DO NOT know how to treat and train an aggressive dog breed. You have to spend A LOT of time with them, some say keep them with you as the master at ALL TIMES.

Most people do not have the time, focus or correct knowledge and attitude to keep an aggressive dog breed so that it is under control and safe. Locking them in a yard and/or leaving them alone drives them crazy, they get insane.

I have no sympathy for such dog owners who get into trouble over an agressive dog breed.

A few years ago a kid in Montpelier, VT went into a Wolf/Dog hybrids yard to get a ball that was accidentally thrown into the yard. The Wolf /hybrid promptly killed the kid in about a minute.

Aggressive breeds have no place being owned by people who do not have the knowledge,ability, time or space to dedicate to them, because they become very dangerous animals, accidents waiting to happen. An agressive dog breed is generally a one person dog, not a family dog like some romantically want them to be. They accept no one as an alpha except their master, without a fight to the death or near death.And even then they will test the Master for weakness from time to time. Most people make the mistake of thinking it is play, and then doggie thinks he is the alpha, thats when the hurtin' starts.

Females are generally less high strung but can be more dangerous than males when they come into heat or have puppies. They just have different kill triggers, and are more likely to drag home what they kill.

I am convinced that only ranchers , and people with big spreads and lots of time on their hands are capable of safely owning an aggressive dog breed.

They have no place in the hands of the ordinary 9-5 working stiff who spends an hour with the dog each day and throws down a little dog food every day.

60 posted on 05/24/2006 6:44:48 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-418 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson