Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/20/2007 4:53:31 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Several threads in progress: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?s=rowling+potter+hogwarts&ok=Search&q=quick&m=any&o=time



Skip to comments.

J.K. Rowling Outs 'Potter' Character
The Indy Channel ^ | 10/20/07

Posted on 10/20/2007 8:42:37 AM PDT by Abathar

NEW YORK -- Harry Potter fans, the rumors are true: Albus Dumbledore, master wizard and Headmaster of Hogwarts, is gay.

J.K. Rowling, author of the mega-selling fantasy series that ended last summer, outed the beloved character Friday night while appearing before a full house at Carnegie Hall. After reading briefly from the final book, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," she took questions from audience members.

She was asked by one young fan whether Dumbledore finds "true love."

"Dumbledore is gay," the author responded to gasps and applause.

She then explained that Dumbledore was smitten with rival Gellert Grindelwald, whom he defeated long ago in a battle between good and bad wizards. "Falling in love can blind us to an extent," Rowling said of Dumbledore's feelings, adding that Dumbledore was "horribly, terribly let down."

Dumbledore's love, she observed, was his "great tragedy."

"Oh, my god," Rowling concluded with a laugh, "the fan fiction."

Potter readers on fan sites and elsewhere on the Internet have speculated on the sexuality of Dumbledore, noting that he has no close relationship with women and a mysterious, troubled past. And explicit scenes with Dumbledore already have appeared in fan fiction.

Rowling told the audience that while working on the planned sixth Potter film, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," she spotted a reference in the script to a girl who once was of interest to Dumbledore. A note was duly passed to director David Yates, revealing the truth about her character.

Rowling, finishing a brief "Open Book Tour" of the United States, her first tour here since 2000, also said that she regarded her Potter books as a "prolonged argument for tolerance" and urged her fans to "question authority."

Not everyone likes her work, Rowling said, likely referring to Christian groups that have alleged the books promote witchcraft. Her news about Dumbledore, she said, will give them one more reason.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Chit/Chat; Religion
KEYWORDS: gay; gayrecruitment; harrypotter; hogwarts; homosexualagenda; politicallycorrect
All I can say is I am glad that it wasn't in the books, I don't think I will let my little kids know about her stupid idea either.
1 posted on 10/20/2007 8:42:39 AM PDT by Abathar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abathar

It does bring a whole new meaning to the term “Head Boy” though....


2 posted on 10/20/2007 8:43:28 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
How very “inclusive” of her to include a homosexual character.Now which one was the “transgendered” one?
3 posted on 10/20/2007 8:47:15 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

I guess the part where Dumbledore molested Harry was left out of the book.


4 posted on 10/20/2007 8:49:16 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

You and me, both.


5 posted on 10/20/2007 9:35:45 AM PDT by chesley (Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I would vote Neville Longbottom for that one...
6 posted on 10/20/2007 9:39:59 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
I'll bet she woulddn't have said that if Richard Harris was still portraying him.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

7 posted on 10/20/2007 9:54:51 AM PDT by Old Seadog (Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Seadog

What a coward. Outing him after the series has concluded knowing that her sales would most assuredly have suffered. While each can make his/her own lifestyle choices, I can now choose not to allow my children to grow up reading her books portraying this behavior as normal. What purpose does this serve to bring it up now?


8 posted on 10/20/2007 10:24:34 AM PDT by AZConcervative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Explains alot about why this guy enjoyed the company of all those young boys.


9 posted on 10/20/2007 1:37:38 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Why? Why? Why? Why? Why ruin it! JK Rowling is a flippin dummy.


10 posted on 10/20/2007 3:01:28 PM PDT by Freedom_Fighter_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Gives a new meaning to “magic wand.”


11 posted on 10/20/2007 3:27:41 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

“Oh, my god,” Rowling concluded

To whom is she referring?


12 posted on 10/20/2007 4:51:16 PM PDT by beefree (MY PEOPLE PERISH FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson