Posted on 07/28/2009 2:01:51 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
The plot thickens again.
So where is the newpaper announcement for the twins in the newspaper? (If I had twins I’d sure want it for their scrap book.)
Of course the claim will be that the numbers kept in reverse order or some such Horse Hockey... LOL
Its the father’s citizenship that matters here...Kenyan/British or what? The mother was too young to confer citizenship.
I just noticed another difference in the numbering format. Obama’s is 151-1961-010641 - notice the 0 starting the last group of numbers. The twins don’t have an initial zero in that group. Why?
Hey, the Hawaiian official reported he is a natural-born citizen, and that’s good enough for the MSM.
Just like the word of several experts and officials that Saddam’s WMDs were hidden in Syria was good enough for the MSM to declare that Bush was telling the truth about the WMDs.
(SARCASM)
My guess is the Hawaii COLB system converts an ‘’old’’ 2-digit birth certificate year into a 4-digit year since no one was worrying about the Y2K computer issue back in 1961. So many of these questions can only be answered by seeing the original long form. What number is printed on it?
There was two COLB images that were posted online the first one was by DailyKos on June 12. The KOmmies scanned .jpg image had the COLB number blacked out.
Then in August, "Factcheck".org released other picture images with the COLB number listed.
Yeah, you’re right. Good catch. Obama’s is six digits and the twins are five digits. In addition to the 1961 vs. 61
10637
10638
010641
I suspect they went from 61 to 1961 around the year 2000 and modified new certificates issued with old numbers...would 2001 be 01 or is that 1901?
the extra 0 is probably because of increase in population...
What are the odds that someone took a picture of the baby nursery from the hospital the day the twins were born?
I don’t know what number is actually printed on Obama’s long form birth certificate. I don’t have “standing” to find out that information. ;)
From the article: “One thing that remains unclear is whether Obama has a copy of the original 1961 Certificate of Live Birth, or if he would even be allowed to see it if he asked.”
Why would there be a question of whether or not he would be allowed to see his original certificate unless he was officially adopted? I don’t know if this still holds true, but when a child was adopted they were not able to see the original birth certificate. So if Obama doesn’t have a copy of the original and he was adopted, he wouldn’t be able to get a copy of the original, just the new amended copy. Does this sound right or am I way off in this thinking? If he could only get the amended version, that’s not what he would want to show everyone.
And when Gov. Lingle said his certificate was sealed, was she just stating a fact due to adoption or did she have the certificate sealed?
Wonder if the Nordyke twins PARENTS remember a VERY BLACK MAN and a VERY WHITE WOMAN having a son in the nursery there?? Back then, woman stayed in the hospital for a few days after giving birth.
“In the big picture, this tidbit is meaningless.”
No, in the big picture, this MAY be a vital piece of information. We don’t know yet.
It IS another small tidbit that is out of kilter, another small anomaly (of the many anomalies) in the saga of Barak Obama’s Top Secret Birth Certificate.
Keep in mind that the term, "live birth," means the birth of an infant, irrespective of the duration of gestation, that exhibits any sign of life, such as respiration, heartbeat, umbilical pulsation, or movement of voluntary muscles.
A live birth is not always a viable birth.
I still maintain that the forger of the original "scam" image redacted the certification number BECAUSE, AT THE TIME HE CREATED IT, HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT OBAMA'S NUMBER WAS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.