Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid; LucyT; 2ndDivisionVet; butterdezillion

The video is now LIVE!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWciae2HFKc

PING A DING-DING-DING DING-DE-O! (GEICO ringtone)


21 posted on 06/05/2010 11:15:28 PM PDT by Polarik (Obama: When destroying America is not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Polarik

Nicely Done —


23 posted on 06/06/2010 8:00:20 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

Master of mendacity: Obama and the birthers

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=160873

Posted: June 01, 2010
1:00 am Eastern

By David Solway

There is more.

Even if we refrain from coming to unequivocal conclusions on this file, it seems almost certain that his records must contain damaging information that could bring his presidency into serious, if not terminal disrepute.

How else would one explain the fact that his university transcripts and his records as an Illinois state legislator, like his “long-form” birth certificate, are inaccessible and that Obama has hired a team of lawyers to make sure they remain that way?

This behavior is completely unprecedented in POTUS annals, and he should be duly challenged on it.

Requiring Obama to open his dossier is not a sign of conspiratorial suspicions;

it is quite simply a civil responsibility and the most reasonable of demands since this is precisely what all U.S. presidents should do and have done.

Shirking this responsibility, however, is largely a symptom of either moral cowardice or false propriety, irrespective of how it may be embroidered for public consumption or self-protection.

Of course, there are some who demur out of a sense of fundamental decency which, we might note, goes unreciprocated by the president and his team.

(touché!)

So the obvious questions are:

Why has Obama not consented to this request?

Why does he not dispel suspicion by making his papers available to the public if he has nothing to fear?

What makes him noli me tangere?

What is he reluctant to shed light upon?

Why is the debate about his origins not stopped dead in its tracks by the publication of valid, irrefutable documentation?

And why are those who ask these logical and totally justifiable questions dismissed as madmen and conspiracy theorists?

The conspiracy, it would seem, travels the other way.

And the farce goes on.


24 posted on 06/06/2010 9:12:21 AM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik; LucyT; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
The video is now LIVE!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWciae2HFKc

PING A DING-DING-DING DING-DE-O! (GEICO ringtone)

Nice, on both accounts. Excellent work b.t.w.

Now, if more in the media will take this issue up (like Dr. Savage last Friday), perhaps it will get the national attention our Constitution demands.

26 posted on 06/06/2010 11:08:59 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

When you have documented evidence of active collusion in the planning and commission of a crime and the cover-up that follows, THAT's a conspiracy, not a "theory."

So, why won't anyone say it?

We already know who conspired to commit fraud and who conspired to shut anyone up who dared mention what they were doing.

Everyone to the right of Karl Marx should know, by now, how 0bama and his gang of accomplices and enablers have played the race card before, during and after the election, ad infinitum.

To what everyone seems to be oblivious is the conspiracy card – this is the trump card that obscures everything we lay on the table.

Is there any doubt that we have the most corrupt, most criminal and most ruthless presidential administration in U.S. history?

. . . . Check out article, and video at # 21.

[Thanks, Polarik. Good to see you here.]

29 posted on 06/06/2010 12:34:54 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

Nice video, thanks!


36 posted on 06/06/2010 1:25:58 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

That was good but I really want to see the next one - “Blue Hawaii caught red-handed!”


39 posted on 06/07/2010 1:47:09 AM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik
Gee! I’m glad to see you back! Thank you, Thank you! Thank you! for all you hard work.
43 posted on 06/07/2010 6:04:33 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

Bump on Polarik! Welcome back!


46 posted on 06/07/2010 10:59:47 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is a fascist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

Good job. Keep the pressure on. I can’t wait to see ‘Blue Hawaii caught red-handed!’


51 posted on 06/07/2010 12:47:57 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson