Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. pair: Baby taken after bagel altered drug test
hosted ^ | Oct 28 | JENNIFER C. YATES

Posted on 10/28/2010 1:38:10 PM PDT by JoeProBono

PITTSBURGH (AP) -- A Pennsylvania couple claims in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that their newborn was taken by county officials when a drug test the mother took came out positive because she had eaten a poppy seed bagel.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the suit on behalf of Elizabeth Mort and her fiance, Alex Rodriguez, against the Lawrence County Children and Youth Services and Jameson Health System.

The suit says the couple's 3-day-old daughter was taken from the couple's home and held for five days before authorities admitted they had made a mistake and returned the child......

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Food
KEYWORDS: pennsylvania; poppyseedbagel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2010 1:38:13 PM PDT by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
The bagel altered the drug test?

Never give a bagel access to the evidence locker key, and you won't have this problem!

2 posted on 10/28/2010 1:39:30 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Karl Rove: The Republican Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

From what I understand, that’s a legitimate concern.


3 posted on 10/28/2010 1:39:56 PM PDT by BuckyKat (Green is the new red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

It was for the children!


4 posted on 10/28/2010 1:41:52 PM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

5 posted on 10/28/2010 1:43:10 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; Larry Lucido; Cagey; MotleyGirl70; Gamecock

Elaine: Well, this you’re not gonna believe. I found out why I was testing positive for opium. Poppy seeds!

Jerry: Poppy seeds!


6 posted on 10/28/2010 1:45:57 PM PDT by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckyKat

Yep. The poppy seed muffins at Costco are a big no-no too. However, I thought that this would only affect a “preliminary” drug test and a more stringent “second pass” would expose it as a false positive.

Maybe I’m wrong. I was wrong once in 1982 and it was a really icky feeling. I hope I’m not wrong this time.


7 posted on 10/28/2010 1:47:40 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: earlJam

‘Jameson Health System has a policy in which they test all patients in the maternity ward for drugs, the suit says. But Rose said the level that determines whether a result is positive for illegal drugs is low and not the standard used by many other entities, including the federal government.”

Well, it used to be a free country ...


8 posted on 10/28/2010 1:48:04 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BuckyKat
We had a young guy that worked for us that failed a drug test for cocaine. It was a great concern for two reasons 1 we didn't think he did drugs, and 2 we were pretty sure we didn't pay him enough to be able to afford cocaine.

Turns out he had been to the dentist the day before and received three injections of something called lidocaine(sp).

A few months later the drug testing company came back and proudly said, “oh, we've altered our questionnaire to include asking if they've been to the dentist and if they received any injections.”

I wonder how often these drug testing companies get the snot sued out of them?

9 posted on 10/28/2010 1:48:22 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
To receive a false positive you need to eat quite a bit of poppy seeds.

Several bagels' worth.

Not only do I doubt that there is a bagel at the bottom of this, but I also doubt that a single positive drug test is the basis for their loss of custody.

10 posted on 10/28/2010 1:48:40 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Not to mention what your teeth look like after eating those poppy seeds...


11 posted on 10/28/2010 1:49:36 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Jameson Health System has a policy in which they test all patients in the maternity ward for drugs, the suit says.

In that case I hope she wins millions.
12 posted on 10/28/2010 1:50:14 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Who ordered her drug test?

Jameson Health System has a policy in which they test all patients in the maternity ward for drugs, the suit says. But Rose said the level that determines whether a result is positive for illegal drugs is low and not the standard used by many other entities, including the federal government.

The suit alleges CYS violated the couple's rights to due process by not doing a better investigation before taking the baby and alleges the hospital was negligent by administering a test that was flawed, among other things.

Do most hospitals do drug test on maternity patients without their knowledge?

13 posted on 10/28/2010 1:51:45 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Surprised they held the baby only five days. In my state, they would have kept the baby, farmed it out to a foster family at least once, put the mother in prison, and she would have needed years just to find the child, not to mention getting it back.

Guilty until proven innocent. Always, always, always in the eyes of Child Protective Services. Except, of course, when the child is actually and brutally abused by drug using mothers and their pusher boyfriends. Then the child is readily returned, and usually turns up the next time in the morgue.


14 posted on 10/28/2010 1:52:03 PM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
"But Rose said the level that determines whether a result is positive for illegal drugs is low and not the standard used by many other entities, including the federal government.”

Believe it. It happens.

15 posted on 10/28/2010 1:52:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I saw a test once, and a bagel wasn’t enough to set off the alarms. You’d need to eat many. Eating a slice of poppy seed cake would do you in though.


16 posted on 10/28/2010 1:53:19 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Never give a bagel access to the evidence locker key, and you won't have this problem!

It's not that simple.

Bagels can be very wily.

I've seen bagels sneak up and take keys (and sometimes even money!) right out of someone's pocket and the person was never even aware.

The poppyseed ones are the worst. The onion ones can be pretty bad, too.

Always be on guard.

17 posted on 10/28/2010 1:53:30 PM PDT by Allegra (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I had a doll with that exact facial expression.


18 posted on 10/28/2010 1:53:51 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Karl Rove: The Republican Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patton
Are they serious? They test their patients without their consent and then turn the results over to the authorities?

WHAT THE HELL????

Are they doing this for some sort of kickback or something? What is their motivation?

I hope they get sued into OBLIVION and lose all their customers, whose medical privacy they have so little concern for.

19 posted on 10/28/2010 1:53:51 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Not only do I doubt that there is a bagel at the bottom of this, but I also doubt that a single positive drug test is the basis for their loss of custody.

Did you read this:

But Rose said the level that determines whether a result is positive for illegal drugs is low and not the standard used by many other entities, including the federal government.
20 posted on 10/28/2010 1:54:35 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson