Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio man guilty in wife's antifreeze poisoning
ap ^ | March 11, 2011 19:35 EST

Posted on 03/12/2011 6:28:25 PM PST by BenLurkin

The Plain Dealer of Cleveland reports that prosecutors believe Auerswald poisoned his wife in a cup of cranberry juice because he was facing financial difficulties and wanted to collect life insurance money and date other women.

(Excerpt) Read more at abc.daytonsnewssource.com ...


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Just my opinion...this merits the death penalty.
1 posted on 03/12/2011 6:28:27 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Just my opinion...this merits the death penalty.

Yep.

2 posted on 03/12/2011 6:34:16 PM PST by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Guess what kind of drink I’d offer him.


3 posted on 03/12/2011 6:35:01 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Ethylene glycol and old lace?


4 posted on 03/12/2011 6:35:50 PM PST by CrazyIvan (What's "My Struggle" in Kenyan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

EVERY MURDER merits the death penalty.


5 posted on 03/12/2011 6:36:09 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

i agree. antifreeze is good enough for him to.


6 posted on 03/12/2011 6:36:57 PM PST by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I agree with you 100%.

BTW - My wife is fine and I had nothing do to with this.


7 posted on 03/12/2011 6:37:24 PM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I agree with you 100%.

BTW - My wife is fine and I had nothing to do with this.


8 posted on 03/12/2011 6:38:12 PM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioman

LOL!


9 posted on 03/12/2011 6:38:29 PM PST by hiasm (Isaiah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Bingo. I’d go further - any crime that threatens the victim with death should receive the same. When confronted with criminals and the threat of harm, victims are faced with potential death. Anyone using this tool is guilty of bringing victims to the brink of death. Take ‘em out with the trash.


10 posted on 03/12/2011 6:39:46 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
i agree. antifreeze is good enough for him to

At least it will take care of his cold blooded streak...

11 posted on 03/12/2011 6:41:20 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (I am declaring 2011 the year of ME.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

I believe Saddam Hussein used to take dogs and starve them and then release a prisoner onto them in confined spaces and that person was generally eaten to the bone.

Anti freeze is too good for this person. That is a sick way to die. He deserves worse.


12 posted on 03/12/2011 6:44:44 PM PST by Michigan Bowhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

I don’t know about that in all cases. Sometimes people lie or believe they are threatened when they have not been. “Perceived” threat could be a real reach in certain cases.

real death threats, I could see locking people up for. But it can’t just be heresay and it has got to be somehow proven that the person claiming it isn’t just making it up. Anyone can be falsely accused of something. Two friends can railroad an innocent person they want out of the way.


13 posted on 03/12/2011 6:45:48 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Horrible, and he does indeed deserve the death penalty.

As for his lawyer’s nutzy suggestions...I was on a jury once in a drunk driving trial where the guy was caught going 100 mph up the offramp on a California freeway. Actually, he was caught after a chase - he’d already gotten on the freeway, heading in the wrong direction, but fortunately it was 3:00 a.m.. He had several mostly empty bottles of vodka rolling around in his car, accompanied by nearly $10,000 in cash in small bills, not unusual since he was clearly a drug dealer by profession. His blood alcohol was virtually on the nearly dead side.

His lawyer’s argument? A passing IV technician had stopped and squirted some rubbing alcohol into his sample. This was so bizarre the judge had to threaten the jury to make us stop laughing. And the lawyer was such an ignoramus he must have gotten his degree off of a cereal box.


14 posted on 03/12/2011 6:47:44 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

True enough. However, convictions for crimes without the threat of the death penalty can also be concocted out of whole cloth. At the least, victims should be able to defend themselves to the point of lethal force anywhere and anytime criminals threaten.


15 posted on 03/12/2011 6:54:11 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

THAT’LL TEACH’ER!


16 posted on 03/12/2011 6:57:02 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

So his financial problems don’t disappear, he doesn’t collect the insurance $$, he can forget about dating any other women like a playboy and he’s going to jail with his wife being dead. His little evil scheme kinda backfired on the Einstein ay?


17 posted on 03/12/2011 7:12:40 PM PST by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
An exclusive death in a soccer Baseball field.
18 posted on 03/12/2011 7:32:57 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Now, mother-in-law, that would be a different matter!


19 posted on 03/12/2011 7:35:32 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
What about this, would that be acceptable?


20 posted on 03/12/2011 7:37:50 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson