Skip to comments.
Who is this whiney Palin-bashing weenie on Hannity's show?
(vanity)
Posted on 05/24/2011 7:11:12 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
For crying out loud.
Hannity has some maroon on now, promoting his Palin-bashing book.
For why?
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: sourgrapes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: CainMutiny; 50mm; Darksheare; darkwing104; Old Sarge; TheOldLady; Allegra
I was wondering how long you'd last.
41
posted on
05/25/2011 5:03:47 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(zero hates Texas and we hate him back.)
To: CainMutiny; Arrowhead1952; darkwing104; 50mm; stephenjohnbanker; SunkenCiv; paulycy; ...
Retread disruptor troll finds a boot up his butt and rides the lightning
Image by JoeProBono
When that all heals up, come on back. We'd love to do it again.
To: Arrowhead1952
43
posted on
05/25/2011 6:12:15 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
To: bwc2221
Watch Fox Business News. They are all great!
Judge Napolitano is THE MAN!
44
posted on
05/25/2011 6:20:54 AM PDT
by
BillM
To: Darksheare
Yes, I looked at the posting history as well and the troll was on an anti Palin streak for a while.
45
posted on
05/25/2011 6:33:13 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(zero hates Texas and we hate him back.)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
The guy was a deer caught in headlights with the same response for every question. Total loser.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I noticed a higher than statistically likely number of males who go bonkers about Palin, seem that way. The most vicious and personal attacks on Palin seem to come from gay men and women who've had abortions.
47
posted on
05/25/2011 6:36:24 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(Palin's detractors now resort to "nobody believes she can win because nobody believes she can win")
To: Arrowhead1952
Made a lame claim to support her too.
What a jerk.
48
posted on
05/25/2011 6:36:56 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I’ve long ago giving up any effort to try to understand why Hannity does what he does. The best answer I can come up with is he’s a goofball.
49
posted on
05/25/2011 6:38:33 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: TheOldLady
50
posted on
05/25/2011 6:48:32 AM PDT
by
paulycy
(Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: Darksheare
Well, if he / she / it supported Palin, it was NOT pissant.
51
posted on
05/25/2011 7:17:10 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(zero hates Texas and we hate him back.)
To: paulycy
Hi Pauly!
Me too, and cute kitteh. Looks like a senior citizen, but cute.
To: terycarl
Chemical engineer.
I guess by your criteria Dan Rather is a freaking genius.
53
posted on
05/25/2011 7:34:24 AM PDT
by
Sloth
(If a tax cut constitutes "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should count as a "desposit.")
To: nolongerademocrat
He wants Newt for POTUS? NOOOOOOOOOO! He has Newt on his show at least a couple of times a week, and has been badgering him about a run for president for the last two years.
54
posted on
05/25/2011 8:17:57 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Arrowhead1952
I suspect it lied.
Repeatedly.
55
posted on
05/25/2011 9:06:30 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
To: Darksheare
56
posted on
05/25/2011 9:17:56 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(zero hates Texas and we hate him back.)
To: artichokegrower
I noticed a reviewer on Amazon, T. Frank, gave a review:
"Performed the "Washington read" of looking up my name in the index, and read the section where I was actually involved, and Dunn gets all the facts wrong (except a handful he cribs from other journalists). They say all publicity is good publicity so long as they spell your name right, but he didn't even spell my name right.
Of course, the book isn't so much journalism as cheerleading for a particular point of view. If you hold that point of view, you'll love the book. If you don't, you won't. Don't expect nuanced analysis.
Edited to add in response to comments: I said I read the "section" involving facts where I was involved and had first-hand knowledge of what happened. That's not "a few paragraphs." That's a "section." Yes, Dunn accurately quotes "Game Change." If that's all you want, why not just read "Game Change"? Asking around, Dunn doesn't appear to have actually talked to anyone involved in the vetting (or even attempted to talk to anyone involved in the vetting), which is perhaps why we get fictional inventions like "Culvahouse was given less than a day to complete the final vetting," which is contradicted just a few pages later. It's a simple standard: if I test the author on questions where I was actually there and know what happened, and the author gets that description wrong and gets basic details wrong, why should I trust the author on anything else? The problem is doubly worse when all of the author's errors are shaded in support of a particular point of view; if the author was making random errors, some would unfairly favor Palin, and some would unfairly criticize Palin. That wasn't what happened here."
I wonder who T.Frank is?
To: Sloth
I guess by your criteria Dan Rather is a freaking genius. I'm thinking............nope, I can't imagine what you're talking about!!
58
posted on
05/25/2011 6:18:17 PM PDT
by
terycarl
To: TheOldLady
He's lost the Battle of Zotsylvania.
59
posted on
05/25/2011 7:21:07 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
To: SunkenCiv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson