Posted on 11/11/2011 4:17:13 PM PST by Lancey Howard
...he would soon be heading into his second decade in prison.
But Jerry Sandusky did NOT bring little girls home to the Sandusky household or taken a little girl as his guest to the Outback Bowl. That would have raised eyebrows. No. Sandusky always seemed to have little boys around, so that was okay. That was safe, everybody told themselves. And what could they say about it anyway?
Had the 1998 witness seen Sandusky fondling or raping a 10-year-old girl rather than a little boy, and had the burly 28-year-old former PSU quarterback Mike McQueary witnessed Sandusky raping a 10-year-old girl, there would have been no running to Daddy or waiting until the next day to tell somebody about it. There would have been no hesitation about what to do. There would have been no reluctance to point the finger and condemn Sandusky as a pedophile.
At the very core of Penn State's ruinous scandal, homosexuality is the elephant in the room - - homosexuality and the political correctness that comes with it. Regular old pedophilia is easy to get publicly outraged about. Even the suspicion of regular old pedophilia elicits menacing sneers at the accused.
But little boys? Well, that's different. That's a homosexual thing, and well, you just have to be... careful. Especially on a college campus where the homosexual "community" rules the day. (Shrug. Gotta be "tolerant" don't you know... enlightened and all that stuff. ..because I'm a good, live-and-let-live person. Que sera sera. Who am I to judge? Etc.)
Homosexuality. Yes, George and Jerry, there's something wrong with that.
When Graham Spanier took over the reins as Penn State's president in 1995 he vowed to make the campus the most LGBT-friendly campus in the nation. Since the arrival of Grahm Spanier as university president, Penn State has sponsored 'the Tent of Consent' – all about gay sex - - as well as C*ntfest. (Remember that?)
Somebody please ping me if they happen to spot a Sandusky story out of the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms that uses the phrase "predatory homosexual pedophile", or even just the word "homosexual"! Even now, the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms are dancing around the obvious, ignoring the elephant in the room.
What’s been reported is the kids were below the age of puberty that makes it pedophila. If they are at puberty or above than you have a gay man praying on male children. Most of the Catholic Church sex scandals fall into this lattter class. The media likes to hide this so they call it child abuse and hide the age of the child and what’s the difference. Stright men are more likely to be involved in pedophilia (many more stright men than gay men in general population). This allows the other issues to be deflected with charges of homophobia. In this case they have mentioned the childrens ages and it looks like pedophila.
Exactly. If you follow this story thru 'mainstream' forums like ESPN and other related news sites; you will be hard-pressed to find the word 'homosexual'. You can't tell me that out of the thousands upon thousands of comments being made at ESPN; not ONE poster has mentioned 'homosexual'??? They are being removed deliberately...political correctness is strangling America.
That’s what I can’t understand. How is Sandusky still alive? With so many kids involved you would think somebody would have gotten to the guy by now. If he had done that to my boy, and I had somehow managed to hold myself back waiting for authorities to act, and then nothing happened to the guy....
What a world.
Are ANY churches preaching against the sin of homosexuality any more?
The Catholic Church is not simply an “organization”. It is the deeply held faith we were raised in. Yes, grievous mistakes were made, but I will not be dumping my faith because of some human failings.
That’s what I can’t understand. How is Sandusky still alive?
He was preying on troubled kids from single parent families. No daddy or any other strong male to take up for them. What McQuery (what a name) didn’t do was dispicible
Excellent judgement, LH.
“You can’t tell me that out of the thousands upon thousands of comments being made at ESPN; not ONE poster has mentioned ‘homosexual’??? They are being removed deliberately...political correctness is strangling”
Do news stories regarding the rape of a woman by a man or the molestation of a girl by a man mention the word heterosexual?
If not, why not?
Please.
>> The gender of the victims has no bearing on the severity of the crimes.
No question, but the argument is about the marginalization of rape perpetrated against male children. This kind of rape is deceitfully mistreated as an unwelcome excess of homosexuality, instead of being treated as the vicious crime it truly is; a crime that is properly adjudicated when it involves female children. It’s a reasonable argument to make if one suspects the homosexual agenda involves the conditioning of children.
>> BINGO little boy or little girl doesn’t matter is just a horrid. and painful
You missed the point. There’s no way in Hell any reputable FReeper would suggest it matters differently.
The correct terminology is: predatory queer! They try to put the pedophile label on them to make it sound like an illness and acceptable (i.e. he couldn’t help it and don’t blame the queers).
I have a relative who’s been in jail a few times and he says Sandusky won’t last a year. He also said he will last most of a year only because the inmates will enjoy torturing him.
>> FR Catholics on this forum will tell you he was a Hebephile or Ephebophile because it sounds nicer than Pedophile.
Really? Got names?
The pastor at the Southern Baptist Church I attend has repeatedly preached against homosexuality.
The ESPN stories covering Kobe Bryant and Ben Roethlisberger did not state that the alleged crimes took place due to Ben and Kobe being heterosexual. Why would you expect them to allege that these rapes took place due to the accused being homosexual?
I don't know what the hell was your point. your comment to me makes no sense at all. Unless your opinion differs from mine. It that case buzz off..if you have a reading comprehension problem too bad..
Good. That’s one.
If Sandusky had raped a little girl; we wouldn’t even be reading about it...he would be serving time, and it wouldn’t have even made the national news. It is the homosexual angle that has made this a big story. but no one mentions it...even Rush said he didn’t DARE mention it. Why the censorship?
You seem bent on making the point there’s an issue concerning severity of the crime according to gender; an issue NOT raised in the article. So there’s no “BINGO” there.
The article concerns the impact of homosexuality on the conscious of society. You may not agree with the premise, but that is the centerpiece of the thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.