Posted on 11/29/2011 4:59:06 AM PST by Lucky9teen
Cain doesn’t have a track record.
—Seems to me if she was his mistress he would have made sure she wasn’t evicted from her apartments.—
Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but I don’t believe she was ever evicted. I think she just got eviction NOTICES.
Just another “nuance” to add to this thing.
And I do think the devil is in the nuances.
Wow yet another Democrat Obama-loving lawyer finds yet another desperate woman in distress to throw out allegations against Cain.
And again without any smoking gun. And this time on a matter that isn’t even relevant to harassment or assault because that bombed.
And I suppose you think there's a point in that somewhere?
As i posted previously, there is this little thing callee the internet and public records... That was not the case in Clinton's era.
Uh. For being on FR so long, you sure are ignorant.
Of course, Cain has a long and successful track record, across several industries. Do just a hint of a bit of research before you embarrass yourself and betray your ignorance.
As I said, Cain’s devotees would stick with him no matter how much proof was presented...as for non-devotees, a fair amount of proof actually has been presented. Cain is the one who has offered no substantial proof that these things didn’t happen (i.e., that he was elsewhere at the time, that he was with someone at the time, etc.) and has even lied about the documented events (the employment settlements).
Now I see people here rationalizing it and even say, well, hey, so what’s wrong if he gets a little on the side every now and then. What red-blooded guy doesn’t? This overlooks issues like abuse of power, abuse of trust, and basic honesty. Cain is a Baptist minister, after all, so he should supposedly know better.
Remember, as with Clinton, it’s not about the sex, it’s about the lying. And Cain has certainly been doing a lot of that. Frankly, I’d suspect he never even mentioned the mistress to the expensive attorney he bought to attack the other women. Even the attorney sounded a little non-plussed.
Yup the report was INTENTIONALLY vague.
You don’t need to say 61 calls or texts, to or from.
If you have just one damning text (or call) you’d show it.
And they barely mentioned this woman has stalked and harassed someone before with texts and calls.
Every one of the smears on Cain are left intentionally vague. Why?
No.
Be sure to write.
Until there is absolute evidence of sexual misconduct by Herman Cain, this is all just the Clarence Thomas style DNC lynching of a prominent black conservative. Sadly, black voters are too stupid to get it and will vote like dullard drones for any DNC candidate despite the filth and character assassinations against black men and women (remember the DNC campaign to smear Condi Rice because she was a prominent black conservative?)..
That is all it would take... yet nothing.
Maybe, in your need to slander the man, you haven't been paying attention like you should.
Hannity, for one, has come out very publically in support of HC. I also think HC's contemporaries at the NRA at the time also came out in support of him.
You need to do a better job on your homework.
Name them.
—Any man is a fool to have or describe a woman as a “friend”.—
My wife and I have an agreement. I never do “lunch” or “coffee” with another woman when it is just the two of us.
Fortunately, dinner and drinks are ok! (not really) ;-)
—I noticed that I haven’t seen anybody from Cain’s past come forth to defend the man’s character.Where are his past business associates?—
I confess that is another nuance in this case I have noticed as well.
“... a fair amount of proof actually has been presented” against Cain.
Uh, no. ACCUSATIONS, yes. PROOF — nope.
Dang, woman, what is your issue with Cain? Why the assumption of guilt? Why believe the conservative-HATING MSM rather than the plain facts before our eyes?
and neither do you
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.