Click the Pic
End Freepathons!
Sheesh!! Do It Now!
Donate today
SIR! MONTHLY, SIR!
Sponsors will donate $10
For each new monthly sign-up
Posted on 01/14/2012 9:42:23 PM PST by Obama Exposer
Hawaii Attorney General files opposition to Taitz's motion for reciprocal subpoena enforcement and also seeks sanctions against Taitz including labeling Taitz a vexatious litigant in Hawaii which means Taitz would be prohibited from filing future lawsuits in Hawaii related to Obama's (non-existent)records without first obtaining leave of Court. The opposition motion also argues why the GA subpoena is not valid in the State of Hawaii, as we already raised and pointed out here. The GA subpoena per OSAH rules is only valid in GA. The Hawaii Attorney General also claims the subpoena was not properly served upon the parties involved.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Why not provide a link? I’d like to see it. I have only heard Orly speak once. Due to the mountains of ridicule and abuse heaped on her, I admit I flinched/shuddered even before she started to speak. I expected the worst.
What I heard was a calm, extremely intelligent, loyal patriot who applied the insights she gained from living in communist Russia to the corruption she observes surrounding Obama. She drew inescapable parallels to the way communist leaders and Pravda behaved and the ploys used by Obama and enabled by the MSM. Every word she spoke was on target and extremely revealing.
I was stunned. How could a woman so demeaned even among *some* conservatives not sound like a lunatic? But she didn’t, and since you are furthering that ugly meme, why not provide an example? It’s not too much to ask.
My question to you is: Without presenting in the Georgia courtroom vital records in the form of a physical, paper legal document with a raised seal, how does Obama prove he was born in Hawaii?
I’ll venture to guess Debbie Wasserman Schultz will provide a written testament (similar to the Pelosi OCON) stating that the DNC has determined that Barack Hssein Obama II meets the constituional reqirements to be POTUS.
But then she risks implicating herself in a consipracy to defraud the electorate of the US.
becasue you are perfectly able to do a youtube search.
Which is why Orly has arranged for wtinesses to present at the trial:
So far confirmed witnesses for January 26 trial against Obama in Atlanta GA. Per Orly:
1. Felicito Papa
2. Douglas Vogt
3. Susan Daniels
4. Dr. Ron Polland
5. Linda Jordan
6. Chris Strunk
7. I will attest on my search in the Selective Service records
8. Plaintiffs David Farrar and Cody Robert Judy
9. I asked another attorney with over 20 years of experience to be there in case I need any additional help. I will pay for his expenses and time.
10. One or two TV reporters told me, they will apply for permits to record the proceedings
I’m not the one smearing Orly and furthering the moonbat meme that she’s insane. She is a true conservative fighting tooth and nail to expose Obama’s lies and ineligibility. She has put it all on the line, and for her trouble she has become the butt of every Obot site in the universe.
So you bash her on a conservative site, which can only delight the Obots. Why do they need to come on FR via stealth identities and revile Orly when people like you are doing their work for them?
Wow! Thank you and all the others sacrificing so much of your time, money and energy fighting on behalf of America. I just prayed for you all and will continue to do so.
You couldn’t have misunderstood what I said more if you were an Obot. Are you reading challenged, or misunderstanding on purpose?
Time will tell..
Agreed.
In my experience with Administrative Law Hearings, the Judges tend to be generous with who is allowed to testify and submit evidence. Most likely, the Judge will accept any evidence handed to him and reserve a ruling the acceptance of the evidence into the record until after everyone identified in pre-trial motions as a witness has had a chance to testify.
After everyone has had their say and objections have been exhausted, the Judge will unilaterally rule which evidence is admitted and which evidence is denied.
It is important to remind yourself of the issues that will be addressed outlined in the pre-trial Order:
A) Is the candidate’s proffered birth certificates, authentic state-issued documents that verify his actual , physical birth in Hawaii?
B)Is the candidate an Article II natural born citizen of the United States as established in US Supreme Court Case: Minor vs Happersett 1875 Page 88 U.S. 163
C) O.C.G.A. 21-3-560 Making of False Statements Generally. Is the candidate’s Social Security number, authentic?
Any evidence that doesn’t contribute to answering these questions will be rejected by the Judge.
It is important for Plaintiffs to point out the difference between Obama’s original birth record and his COLB he has shown online. Specifically, his original birth record has a “date accepted” with signatures of his mother, hospital administrator and delivery doctor; while his COLB has a “date filed” and no signatures.
The “date filed” on the COLB is indicative of a change, update, modification, or edit after the original birth record was accepted by the Hawai’i DoH. Comparing other Hawai’i COLBs with the corresponding original shows each has a “date accepted” unless there was an update, change, modification or edit after the original was accepted.
The circumstantial evidence Lolo Soetoro adopted Barack Hussein Obama II and naturalized him as an Indonesian National is as follows:
1) The original birth record was sealed and archived as per procedure when an adoption is finalized. The policy a parent cannot renounce the citizenship of a minor was instituted after Obama took office. Anyone, of any age, can move out of the country and renounce their US citizenship.
2) Barry Soetoro, son of Lolo Soetoro and Indonesian Nationals, was enrolled in St. Francis Assisi, Jakarta, Indonesia.
3) The procedure for a US Immigration Customs Enforcement agent who encountered a unaccompanied minor who was not from a border country with the US is to take the child into protective custody and place the child in the Federal Foster care program.
4) Catholic Social Services of Connecticut contracted with the US State Department in 1971 to take custody of unaccompanied minors in the Federal foster care program. It was Catholic Social Services who financed BHO’s Sr. trip from Kenya to Hawai’i in Dec. 1971 to participate in a custody hearing concerning Barry Soetoro, Indonesian National, formerly known as Barack Hussein Obama II. It was at this custody hearing BHO Sr complained he was not informed of his son’s adoption and objected to it. The Soetoro adoption was annulled.
5) Race of father, African, was a politically correct addendum to the new birth record the Hawai’i court ordered due to the annulment of the Soetoro adoption. The Soetoro adoption legally changed who BHO’s II parents where but did not change his Indonesian Nationality.
6) The Court ordered BHO II to remain in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services and appointed Madelyn Payne Dunham as BHO’s II guardian.
7) A Connecticut SSN is indicative of a Permanent Resident Alien, Barack Hussein Obama II, Indonesian National, who was in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut. A Permanent Resident Alien is identified on the SSA in the “PRA” field of the SSA’s document identification number. BHO’s II “PRA” field is a “Y” indicating “yes” he is a Permanent Resident Alien of the U.S.
8)Five years after he turned 18 years old, BHO II naturalized as an American citizen. His Certificate of Naturalization is on file with the USCIS.
Why not take the statements of HI officials specifically Okubo (it is half hand written and half type written) or Abercrombie (written down in the State archives) and contrast those statements to what Obama released on April 27th.
They just do not jive...
That’s plausible. But it is important the Judge understand that not all original birth certificates are sealed and archived. An original BC in Hawai’i is only sealed and archived by a Court Order, i.e. adoption.
Also, Hawai’i has a provision for adult adoptees to examine a certified copy of their sealed and archived if a written request is made by the adult adoptee to the Hawai’i DoH.
thanks for the correction (yikes :-( )
When you say “The “date filed” on the COLB is indicative of a change, update, modification, or edit after the original birth record was accepted....” you’re talking through your hat. There is no authority for such a claim.
The FACT that all the dates on the COLB and the Long form MATCH, proves your remark is nonsense.
The “date filed” field data is backdated to the “date accepted” to ensure privacy as to the matter of a correction, update, edit or change.
The only clue a correction, update, edit or change has taken place in the birth records is the “date accepted” and “date filed” have been changed. Obots have erroneously maintained the date Aug 8, 1961 has remained unchanged in the original birth record and the COLB, yet there is no image data available on the net where there is a “date accepted” with a date and “date filed” with a different date.
For clarity:
If there haven’t been any changes, edits, corrections or updates to the birth record in Hawai’i, then the Original LFBC will have “date accepted” and the COLB will have a “date accepted” with the same date.
If there has been a change, edit, correction or update to the birth record in Hawai’i, then the Original LFBC will have a “date accepted” and the COLB will have a “date filed” with the same date.
being born on US soil is ONE part of the natural born requirement.
the other part is being born of TWO American citizen parents.
the need for the birth certificate was to prove both the location of birth and the citizenship of the parents at the time of his birth. we may all 'known' that his father was kenyan when he was born... but there has never been an official document stating as much
for all those trying to say he's natural born... i'd sure like to know how that's possible with one parent being a foreign citizen
in other words... forget the law, just kiss the ring
why do i think you're in chicago.
as for your comments regarding Dr Orly's grammar... glass houses, buddy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.