Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Help with Fed Statue RE: At Time Of Obama Birth
self ^ | 2012-05-31 | abigkahuna

Posted on 05/31/2012 7:21:58 PM PDT by abigkahuna

Hello FR iends!

I need help with the Fed Statue Number in force at the time of Obama's birth dealing with conferred citizenship from his mother. The fact that she could not confer natural born citizenship due to the fact that she was not five years a citizen after her 14th birthday.

On a side note, why is this issue no longer valid? Having waded through countless threads over the past four years regarding this issue, I see that this particular statue seemed to have fallen by the wayside. Is there a reason?

Anyway, thanks FRiends for your help with the particular statue and number.

regards,

abigkahuna


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous; Reference
KEYWORDS: naturalborncitizen; obamabirth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: GreyFriar
are u serious???.....

U might want to lay off the sedatives and pain killers if u are...I'm guessing you want to be a lawyer someday?...lol

41 posted on 05/31/2012 9:52:20 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/05/indiana-court-subpoenas-obama-to-appear.html


42 posted on 05/31/2012 10:00:54 PM PDT by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna
I can't help you. You think a positive law (a man made law) governing aliens governs natural born citizens.
No positive law makes somebody a natural born citizen. USC 8 is positive law. And you're being given links to various "Acts".

Think about it.

43 posted on 05/31/2012 10:14:46 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna
From the Department of State website, "U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs":

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf

Page 17:

7 FAM 1133.2-2 Original Provisions and Amendments to Section 301

(CT:CON-317; 12-08-2009)

a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952,section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children.

On a side note, why is this issue no longer valid?

It is still valid. This is critical to understanding why it was so important for Obama to provide the best available documentation of his birth, yet the MSM steadfastly refused to report it.

I wonder how many Americans now understand that Obama's mother, at age 18, was one year too young to have transmitted her citizenship to her son if she gave birth outside the United States? Do even five percent of Americans know that?

44 posted on 05/31/2012 11:44:23 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna
Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974. (Read More): Bâri′, Barry, Barack
45 posted on 06/01/2012 1:29:12 AM PDT by goron (Revelation 13:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

Am I serious? I guess you did not see my winky face ;-) indicating that I was being sarcastic. That is my standard reply to folks over the entire “naturally born” thing.


46 posted on 06/01/2012 4:32:59 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Whoops....missed the wink....sorry about that!...my bad


47 posted on 06/01/2012 6:56:15 AM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

“....so far not one member of congress is making or has made that argument and called for obama to resign ...”

.
And not one of them ever will — we can’t depend on Congress, they’re a bunch of eunuchs.


48 posted on 06/01/2012 11:51:32 AM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Citizen parents matter. It’s a discussion that needs to be held and confronted with Foggers, Faithers and Obama’s Excuse Makers. The question they can’t explain away is why the Minor court rejected Virginia Minor’s 14th amendment citizenship argument and why they said ANYTHING about citizen parents. Further, why does Wong Kim Ark also talk about citizen parents when it gave the holding in Minor?? There’s an obvious answer, but the Obama apologists don’t want to admit what that answer is. Citizen parents matter and they were used to exclusively define natural-born citizenship per Article II of the Constitution. What other reason would there be for saying anything about citizen parents??


49 posted on 06/01/2012 10:21:00 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kabar

That’s actually not the statute, but rather the State Department *interpretation* of the statues that exist now, and that existed in the past.

But it’s clear that *IF BORN ABROAD*, BHO was not a citizen at birth, a necessary but not sufficient condition for being a natural born citizen.

But if born in the US, even if one parent was not a citizen, he was a citizen at birth... I repeat.. a necessary but not sufficient condition for NBC status.


50 posted on 06/02/2012 9:00:01 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
That’s actually not the statute, but rather the State Department *interpretation* of the statues that exist now, and that existed in the past.

No that is the law of the land, which is enshrined in statute. It is "interpreted" that way by the entire federal government, not just the State Department.

But it’s clear that *IF BORN ABROAD*, BHO was not a citizen at birth, a necessary but not sufficient condition for being a natural born citizen.

No, if he was born abroad out of wedlock, then he would be a citizen. The interpretation of natural born citizen as it applies to Presidential eligibility to be President under the Constitution has never been decided by the courts.

But if born in the US, even if one parent was not a citizen, he was a citizen at birth... I repeat.. a necessary but not sufficient condition for NBC status.

You are entitled to your opinion, but it is not settled law. Lawrence Tribe and Ted Olson disagree with you. They believe that jus solis is sufficient for NBC Their opinion, asked for by the Senate, carries some weight--perhaps even more than your opinion. The bottom line is that we need the courts to decide this sooner rather than later.

51 posted on 06/03/2012 7:02:53 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kabar
I didn't say the State departments interpretation (Maybe you'd like paraphrase) was not correct, just that it is not the actual statute.

While I'm sure Olson and Tribe's opinions carry more weight than mine, they're still historically wrong on this issue. Plenty of evidence that the founders meant your father had to be a citizen and you had to be born in the country, or while your father was in it's service outside of it. In those days a woman became a citizen when she married one, automatically, so this was in effect the same at the "parents who are it's citizens" requirement in "Law of Nations".

Opinions being like assholes, everyone having one. The truth is whatever it is, regardless of opinions.

52 posted on 06/03/2012 12:14:58 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The State Department cited the federal statute. It is not the State Department's interpretation. It is the Federal Government's implementation of the law.

While I'm sure Olson and Tribe's opinions carry more weight than mine, they're still historically wrong on this issue.

LOL. That's your opinion. Like you said, opinons are like assholes, everyone has one. We do know that Senate Resolution 511 declared that McCain was eligible to run for the Presidency based on the Tribe/Olson opinion. He ran and so did Obama. Obama is in the WH. Until the courts decide what was the Founder's intention, Obama is not going anywhere.

Opinions being like assholes, everyone having one. The truth is whatever it is, regardless of opinions.

The "truth" will be what SCOTUS decides. I will reiterate, we need a decision sooner rather than later. With 40 million foreign born in this country--about one in 8--and projections indicate it will be one in 5 by 2050, we need a decision. Moreover, there are 300,000 to 400,000 anchor babies born each year to illegal aliens and the birth tourism industry is thriving.

53 posted on 06/03/2012 1:24:32 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna; kabar

A natural born citizen does not need a statute or any law to be a citizen. It is a result of nature. It seems that congress and the courts recognize this fact or they would have passed a law to define an NBC. They tried more than once but nature does not yield to laws of congress. If you need a statute to define your citizenship then you are not a NBC.

As long as people think that the court needs to rule on the subject, they will wait. I doubt that SCOTUS will do anything before the election. In the meantime, we keep the status quo. After the election, we’ll have more of the same.

Citizen by nature or citizen by law?


54 posted on 06/04/2012 8:20:10 PM PDT by Seven_0 (You cannot fool all of the people, ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seven_0

Both political parties have realized for more than a decade that the wording in the Constitution is very restrictive, and this has led to —IIRC— at least legislative efforts to amend the meaning without success. These efforts fail because the proper way to amend the Constitution is being ignored by the ones trying to change things. The most recent fraudulent effort was supposedly red into the Congressional record to give Mccain a free pass on being born in a Hospiatl in Colon, Panama. Even in that fraud, little barry bastard commie tried to write in a lie to fit his illegitimate status.


55 posted on 06/04/2012 8:35:08 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Seven_0

Both political parties have realized for more than a decade that the wording in the Constitution is very restrictive, and this has led to —IIRC— at least legislative efforts to amend the meaning without success. These efforts fail because the proper way to amend the Constitution is being ignored by the ones trying to change things. So is it any wonder that the feckless pubbies are looking the other way while little bastard barry usurps the Constituion? The most recent fraudulent effort was supposedly red into the Congressional record to give McCain a free pass on being born in a Hospital in Colon, Panama. Even in that fraud, little barry bastard commie tried to write in a lie to fit his illegitimate status.


56 posted on 06/04/2012 8:36:44 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Seven_0

Both political parties have realized for more than a decade that the wording in the Constitution is very restrictive, and this has led to —IIRC— at least legislative efforts to amend the meaning without success. These efforts fail because the proper way to amend the Constitution is being ignored by the ones trying to change things. So is it any wonder that the feckless pubbies are looking the other way while little bastard barry usurps the Constituion? The most recent fraudulent effort was supposedly read into the Congressional record to give McCain a free pass on being born in a Hospital in Colon, Panama. Even in that fraud, little barry bastard commie tried to write in a lie to fit his illegitimate status.


57 posted on 06/04/2012 8:36:51 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson