Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I have a legitimate question for folks.
question? | 07/23/12 | winston's julia

Posted on 07/23/2012 5:29:02 PM PDT by Winstons Julia

Please don't flame me... but something has me confused. WHY can people buy canisters of tear gas?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: banglist; jamesholmes; teargas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Winstons Julia

Clear out the crowd after Thanksgiving dinner...


41 posted on 07/23/2012 8:04:58 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

I thought the baked beans did that.


42 posted on 07/23/2012 8:19:39 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (Hello OWS? We don't need a revolution like China's; China needs a revolution like OURS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Excellent response. I have see some of the craziest comments on FR over the last few days that you can imagine. One poster questioned why the Batman killers ammo purchases were not tracked and reported. Yes, someone on FR asked that question. I asked him why they would be tracked and to whom would they be reported. I got a non-answer, but I could not believe someone would even ask that question. Sometimes I feel like I’ve come to the wrong website.


43 posted on 07/23/2012 8:29:22 PM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

You are both quite correct. Under what Constitutional authority?

That’s not to say such authority cannot be derived, only that the first review of any such question must commence and terminate in that direction.


44 posted on 07/23/2012 10:47:37 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale; JRandomFreeper
Thanks, Bob, I think you wanted to ping JRandomFreeper, too, so I did.

I think that the Constitutional authority of government employees to do most anything is severely limited, and that is the fact that must be addressed first.

Then it is necessary for the citizen to question and ascertain the motives of the government employees immediately following the assessment of Constitutional authority.

Finally, humor aside, in this thread, the choice of the active adverb (can, may, will, should, ect) gets folks thinking about distractions rather than what's at stake.

45 posted on 07/24/2012 1:05:44 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia
So it’s more of a “contingency” thing than a practical use thing?

Yeah.

46 posted on 07/24/2012 5:01:14 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Depone serpentem et ab veneno gradere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson