Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 10 worst movie remakes of all time (Who ordered the Total Rehash?)
The Orange County Register ^ | August 2, 2012 | Barry Koltnow

Posted on 08/03/2012 12:29:50 PM PDT by EveningStar

With the opening Friday of "Total Recall," thoughts immediately turn to the subject of movie remakes...

Remakes are nothing new in Hollywood, although movie studios prefer to call them "reboots" or "re-imaginations." For some reason, the word "remake" has a negative connotation among moviegoers. Perhaps it's because it seems like a lazy and unimaginative way to make movies...

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cinema; film; hollywood; moviereview; movies; remake; remakes; totalrecall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: EveningStar

Two movies, I pray never get remade, but I fear will eventually be remade:

The Dirty Dozen
The Warriors


81 posted on 08/03/2012 2:34:20 PM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

That’s right, and Sarah Michelle Gellar was “Amazing” .


82 posted on 08/03/2012 2:38:25 PM PDT by SMGFan (SMGfan is not "Sub Machine Gun" fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Disagree with you about the Star Trek reboot...though Chris Pine needs to sound less whiny!


83 posted on 08/03/2012 2:49:52 PM PDT by mdmathis6 (Not left wing! Not right wing! But....CHRIST WING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Scarface (1932) versus Scarface (1983) - I’ll take Pacino


84 posted on 08/03/2012 2:54:02 PM PDT by 103198
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

It’s going to be interesting. Arnold’s Total Recall was a travesty based on a great story. I have hopes that this one stays truer to the source material, hence making a better film.

Of the list, I have two disagreements.

The 2002 version of Mr. Deeds was better than the original. Capra fans everywhere will now hate me. Sorry, but the new version was actually funny.

The 2010 Wolfman was head an shoulders above the rubber-masked original.


85 posted on 08/03/2012 3:02:08 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Good, it’s not supposed to.


86 posted on 08/03/2012 3:07:43 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Trekkies Bash New Star Trek Film As ‘Fun, Watchable’

http://www.theonion.com/video/trekkies-bash-new-star-trek-film-as-fun-watchable,14333/


87 posted on 08/03/2012 3:09:04 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
here's a hint, ANYTHING, with that useless eater, no-talent hack brand in it, IS GONNA SUCK!!!
88 posted on 08/03/2012 3:13:29 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Heston: Great movie, doesn’t stand the test of time.
Walberg: Horrible movie in every sense of the word.
Franco: Amazing movie that surpasses both of them.


89 posted on 08/03/2012 3:15:18 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Speaking of Denzel and remakes. His remake of Scott Glen’s, Man On Fire was horrible. Nowhere near as good as the original.


90 posted on 08/03/2012 3:16:36 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Come on, fair is fair. King only tried his hand at directing once, Maximum Overdrive, more than a quarter of a century ago. He did just fine as a screenwriter.


91 posted on 08/03/2012 3:17:21 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

As an adjunct to this discussion, I just got this morning the 70th Anniversary edition of “The Wizard of Oz”

For any true movie fans and historians out there, all I can say is GET THIS!!!!

The color and detail is amazing, I’m seeing things in every scene that I never noticed before.

And it’s a two disc set that has over 3 hours of extras about the cast, making the movie, and Baum, the author.


92 posted on 08/03/2012 3:22:58 PM PDT by djf (The barbarian hordes will ALWAYS outnumber the clean-shaven. And they vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Well, the remakes of two movies I mentioned were supposed to be retellings true to Kings original writings, which I assumed meant he had control over the scripts and the directing. Regardless, they were awful.
93 posted on 08/03/2012 3:28:51 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

“I just found out this morning that Total Recall doesn’t go to Mars this time.”

Which is an improvement.

I just re-read the source story. No actual trip to Mars. Covers little more than a city block, actually. And includes a second twist.


94 posted on 08/03/2012 3:29:26 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

“We can remember it for you, wholesale”

Philip K. Dick


95 posted on 08/03/2012 3:34:46 PM PDT by djf (The barbarian hordes will ALWAYS outnumber the clean-shaven. And they vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

How-ya-do-ya!


96 posted on 08/03/2012 3:35:20 PM PDT by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Strangely in the director’s commentary of the Man Who Knew Too Little on DVD, The Man Who Knew Too Much was not even mentioned.

It was a good movie but you would think they might have put in something about Marrakesh or Anders Chapel or something.

The Taking of Pelham 123 was a bad remake.
I actually liked the 1976 version of King Kong.
Ocean’s 11 with Julia Roberts was bad too - the original told you that crime doesn’t pay.


97 posted on 08/03/2012 3:37:26 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Well, the version of The Shining that you liked so much, was brilliant because it was a Kubrick movie. What you’re watching is Stanley Kubrick’s brilliance, not Stephen King’s story. It deviated heavily from the book, and King fans weren’t happy with it. Kubrick especially downplayed Danny’s pyschic abilities, which Halloran calls the Shining. Fans were understandably unhappy that a detail so crucial that it lent the work it’s very name is so underplayed.

Ditto for Salem’s Lot. The orginal with David Soul took so many liberties with the novel that it’s barely the same story. The remake did a much better job, especially with Barlow.


98 posted on 08/03/2012 3:40:38 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

I think it was William holden


99 posted on 08/03/2012 3:47:17 PM PDT by Baltosage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dangus

The Maltese Falcon was made twice before they got it right with Bogart on the third try.


100 posted on 08/03/2012 3:50:24 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson