Psychiatry expert: ‘scientifically there is no such thing as transgender’

lsn ^ | 1.16.2013 | Thaddeus Baklinski

[Tublecane]

If you wanna act and dress like the opposite sex, okay. But why are doctors expected to take seriously that you’re really a man or woman underneath, and why must the law be pulled in to protect your putative “right” to be what you aren’t? We’ve already started towards normalization of the desire to hack off limbs. Next I suppose it’ll be demon possession. And finally science will be an indentured servant to all manner of superstition, except the politically incorrect ones.

[Shadow44]

I wouldn’t be surprised if this psychiatrist has to go into hiding for daring to left things like “facts” oppose the left’s agenda.

[I want the USA back]

The angry fang-toothed feminazis will attempt to destroy him.

[traditional1]

Political Correctness, or rather, what Progressives create words for describing Sex Deviates, encompasses every known alternative behavior.

Instead of Medical Requirements now to ask "do you have guns in your home", when they interview Obamacare Patients, they can ask "what's wrong with you? Why are you a faggot/dyke/cross-dresser/sex-change candidate/pedophile/etc."

[Jim Noble]

It is interesting that, as the “transgender” thing has collapsed in a medical-scientific sense (it’s been over for at least ten years), it has never been more powerful politically.

Go figure.

[Uncle Miltie]

Can I just be “transgendered” when I want to wander through the ladies’ locker room at the gym after yoga?

Then I’ll assuredly become hetro again. It’s kinda curative, so they’re really part of my 0bamaCare mandated treatment.

Just askin’......

[BobL]

I know one ‘doctor’ that is about to lose his license.

[snooter55]

fer later .....

[Cyman]

Scientifically there is no such thing as a psychiatry expert.

[Fzob]

Doesn’t this Dr. know that science and politics are incompatible.

[fwdude]

I wouldn’t be surprised if this psychiatrist has to go into hiding for daring to left things like “facts” oppose the left’s agenda.

There is absolutely no exaggeration in your statement. Considering that a researcher in a Texas university received extremely harsh vitriol and threats of violence for daring to question the homosexual agenda was surprising but not completely unexpected, except in the degree of hatred expressed. But this doctor is in Canada, where perversion has made much further inroads.

[Hot Tabasco]

there is no such thing as a "transgendered" person,

[fwdude]

The perversion activists made the push to add "gender identity and expression" to my large Texas city's non-discrimination ordinance several years ago. There was no scientific evidence presented at the council meeting, only a bunch of cross dressers (it was a literal circus in that room) prancing around demanding to be treated as special. They won by a vote.

It's revealing that these ordinances always include "gender expression," defined as a man who wants to identify as a man but "express" himself as a woman on a whim, along with "transgender," defined as a "wrong body sex." In other words, science CANNOT objectively and scientifically determine who meets these criteria.

[Arthur McGowan]

What’s wrong with the scientific terms “confused,” and “screwed up”?

[Fred Hayek]

The mutilation does not cover up the fact that a certain pair of chromosmes are either xx or xy. But then, real science based on hard evidence does not matter anymore. Lysenko is laughing his @$$ off in Hell.

[Gay State Conservative]

"X" + "Y" = male

"X" + "X" = female

It ain't rocket science.

[GeronL]

I think many of us already knew that

[Gay State Conservative]

It's not nice to fool Mother Nature!

[SuziQ]

Moreover, Dr. Berger stated that the arguments put forward by those advocating for special rights for gender confused people have no scientific value and are subjective and emotional appeals with no objective scientific basis.

"I have read the brief put forward by those advocating special rights, and I find nothing of scientific value in it," Dr. Berger said in his statement. "Words and phrases, such as 'the inner space,' are used that have no objective scientific basis."

Is this man gonna run afoul of the Canadian thought police?