Posted on 01/25/2013 9:04:25 AM PST by central_va
If you want to stop these pro women in combat lunes dead in their tracks ask them this hypothetical question:
You are a General of an Infantry division and your Commander lets you choose one of two enemy divisions to fight. The first enemy division that you could choose to oppose in the upcoming battle is all male. Or you could instead choose to fight the second enemy division that was mixed faggot, women and men. So which enemy division would you choose to fight?
Lynch says she wasn't raped, that the author insisted on throwing that in.
to paraphrase a soviet general commenting on fighting an american and a german division
“i would fight the all male division first. business before pleasure.”
Why? All-Male units are the ideal, the perfect fighting machine, the normal, what would be the drawback or weakness in having an all female unit?
provide an opportunity for the woman to escape
Yeah - and I agree with that. They'll buy a second or two, or convince someone who's just looking for an easy target to look elsewhere. So, they're not a complete waste. Like I said, Situational Awareness is everything... thugs are looking for people who aren't paying attention. Period.
But as with most lib sacred cows, the law of unintended consequences looks (to me, at least) to have reared its ugly head. Women - for the most part, certainly there are exceptions - can't go toe-to-toe with a male attacker, and should never, ever be encouraged to think otherwise. There's a huge difference between, say, some punk in a parking deck looking for an easy mark, and an ex-boyfriend breaking down the door.
But, I suppose, "Yeah, I'll kick the guy's ass" sounds much better than, "I'll calmly get my .38 and wait in the bedroom, putting the bed between myself and the intruder and using it as a support if possible, while I call 911. Gee, I really, really hope that he'll just go away so I don't need to shoot him."
Their PC mentality has such a lock on their brains, that it is going to literally break their minds when they find themselves in real combat and are forced to face the reality that most of the world doesn’t play by or even recognise the rules of political correctness. The enemy will see a female “soldier” in combat as not just “the enemy” but as a female and act accordingly, in keeping with the rules of primitive societies all over the world. I wonder how many times this will have to happen before the delusional leftists admit that they can’t overrule biology or human nature left unchecked, ie uncivilised, non-politically correct, etc.
I think that he hates what America has become. That, and he's written about being nearly blind because he picked up a load of shrapnel in his eyes in Vietnam. I'm guessing that he's a little bitter about that.
But, he's led an interesting life. I like some of his old magazine articles, particularly the ones where he wrote about Soldier of Fortune. He wrote a book about SoF but couldn't sell it. All of the editors thought that it wasn't believable enough....problem was the stories were all true....
Fred, sez me, would be an interesting guy to drink a six-pack with.
Because that would be the unit that the enemy directed all their fire power on?
Of course that’s the normal, there aren’t any with women. Some things would take more than one women to accomplish, where it would only take one male.
I've always been struck by one point that he made. Women in the military have "Battle Buddies", basically a buddy who accompanies them everywhere to prevent sexual harrassment, or somesuch.
Said Fred (approximately), "We simultaneously expect women to take on the enemy in combat, and also think that they can't go the the bathroom by themselves for fear that someone might harrass them."
Truly, the inmates are in charge of the asylum.
Thanks, I will check it out. It looks interesting, I like to read the views of those who pull no punches when it comes to PC because it’s such a rarity n this world even amongst conservatives. As long as they are intelligent and tell the truth.
Re “battle buddies”-what a joke. The same women whose delicate sensitivities can’t take a sexist joke are supposed to be able to face down and overcome an enemy who will not only want to kill them, but will want to “use” them first if he has time before killing them.
I don’t think even leftists are this stupid. I think that this is one more route in undermining our military capability.
Holy cow.
Yeah, which is why in #23 I said it would be foolish for a general to have all-female units.
Out of respect for Gay soldiers the Army served a new cereal called Queerios. It didn’t work out though because when you added milk the cereal pieces all ate each other.
The enemy doesn't just get to pick and choose which units that they can direct "all" their fire power on based on the demographics of a unit, war doesn't work that way, and what general would not want all male military units?
America can lose wars, and can cease to exist as a nation.
Females mean lost battles, which can lead to lost wars. In a major war, to a nation powerful enough to force our complete capitulation, then that means we become theirs.
nice one
Exactly, which is why there wouldn’t be any all-female units.
So explain what your question is.
There is a sexual assault epidemic in the ranks. They can’t seem to get a handle on it. It’s not all GIs doing the assaults like the midia potrays. Some of it is contractors (ours and host nation) and host nation folks.
Seems like the little muzzies boys like copping a feel every once in a while.
Leftists are that stupid, many of them. The exceptions are commonly those from a working class/private sector union background who often have some real acquaintance with actual physical labor. I’m on fairly good terms with a Teamster who is quite leftist on many issues, but he knows how to break a sweat and has only contempt for the academic left types who have never done a lick a physical work in their lives. He’s also fairly conservative on gender issues because he understands that men and women are different.
That said, there are a lot of academic leftist types who have never done physical work, nor even played competitive sports, nor had kids who played competitively. Some of them literally don’t have a clue. They really think if the girls trained up a bit, they would be physically competitive. Impenetrable ignorance.
The liberal soccer moms, I must say, are perfectly sensible about this. Many of them are fiercely competitive (their girls are playing travel soccer, after all), and they know perfectly well that their daughters, who played coed when they were little, haven’t been able to hang in with the guys since they were 12.
??? Go back and read the thread, then #16
I see what happened. I got screwed up answering the same question in 2 different threads and I thought he was talking about either all men or all female.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.