Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998

Touched a nerve! Good. I’m over the target. I’m getting that “you’re a liberal” namecalling flak. It’s the last gasp of those with no grasp.

>> you’re assuming I have no understanding simply because I disagree with you

No, I’m *concluding* (not assuming) you have no understanding, based on your own testimony, to me and to others. You have *shown* no understanding, in spite of being given the opportunity to do so. Your nonsensical mumbo-jumbo and claims do NOT constitute understanding. Maybe your public skool teachers told you that your holy opinion was sufficient to carry an argument; if so, they did you a disservice.

Bye now. And please don’t screw up anyone else.


60 posted on 06/18/2013 6:50:07 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

“Touched a nerve! Good.”

No, you haven’t even come close to getting on my nerves.

“I’m over the target.”

No, I think you’re in over your head.

“I’m getting that “you’re a liberal” namecalling flak.”

No, you’re not. Learn to read. It’s fundamental. You are saying I said “you’re a liberal”. I actually wrote the following: “Like a liberal you’re assuming I have no understanding simply because I disagree with you. Notice, I am NOT doing that to you or anyone else in the thread.”

I was right as well. I never said you do not have understanding simply because I disagree with your view. Rather than properly represent what I said, you chose to do otherwise. Why would you do that? I hope you have the courage to answer that question. Quite frankly I doubt you do.

“It’s the last gasp of those with no grasp.”

No, I think the last gasp is when someone DELIBERATELY chooses to post a falsehood - which is what you have done. Why did you do that?

“No, I’m *concluding* (not assuming) you have no understanding, based on your own testimony, to me and to others.”

Not possible. I presented no testimony to speak of other than a rather sparse personal comment. Thus, your rationalization is false and in fact disingenuous. How telling.

“You have *shown* no understanding, in spite of being given the opportunity to do so.”

No, actually I have shown understanding. Your dismissal of that fact does not change that it exists.

“Your nonsensical mumbo-jumbo and claims do NOT constitute understanding.”

I said nothing nonsensical. I used no mumbo-jumbo at all. Clearly it is I who hit upon a nerve. I’ll sleep tonight without a second thought about you. I don’t think you’ve stopped frothing at the mouth yet nor will you for some time.

“Maybe your public skool teachers told you that your holy opinion was sufficient to carry an argument; if so, they did you a disservice.”

I never attended public school, and if I did I doubt they would call anything they taught me “holy” precisely because it would have been a public school and not a religious one. Not only do you not know what you’re talking about, but you can’t even post something that has any internal coherence.

“Bye now.”

That’s right. Thump your chest...as you take your ball and go home. Gee, I hope you’re not crying in your room. Maybe your mom can bring you a cookie and milk and tell you everything will be fine.

“And please don’t screw up anyone else.”

I’ll continue to keep making sense, thanks. If you believe that screws up anyone, all the better.

Yeah, I think I was the one who touched a nerve. You’re not still crying are you?


61 posted on 06/18/2013 7:21:43 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson