Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if Barbie looked like a real woman?
moxy/canoe.ca ^ | July 4, 2013 | Kate Kennedy

Posted on 07/04/2013 5:53:50 PM PDT by rickmichaels

How many girls dream of looking like Barbie when they grow up – only to realize it’s physically impossible?

Estimates of what a woman would look like if she had Barbie’s measurements rack up – so to speak – at about 39”-20”-33″. She would be 6 to 7 feet tall and only weigh about 100 to 108 pounds.

Photographer and artist Nickolay Lamm aimed to answer this question recently by creating 3D images of a Barbie doll with a “real-life”. Lamm used CDC measurements for the average American 19-year-old female in creating his doll – she has a 33.6-inch waist and weighs 150 pounds.

Image: Barbie with no makeup

I adored Barbie as much as the next middle class white kid, but after gazing at Lamm’s doll for a minute, it was the archetype that looked strange.

These images exemplify the bizarre and fictitious ideals girls and boys grow up with. I’m not even sure what Mattel’s motivation is in keeping Barbie’s crazy measurements – wouldn’t a more realistic version sell just as well? We’re not even getting into the cultural and racial diversity Barbie lacks.


(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.canoe.ca ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: barbie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last
To: Hoodat

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! That was the FIRST thing that popped into my mind!

Hilarious!


101 posted on 07/04/2013 9:17:49 PM PDT by rlmorel (Silence: The New Hate Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

No, the realistic one wouldn’t sell as well. But go ahead and spend a few million proving it.


102 posted on 07/04/2013 9:26:25 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
What is with the left’s obsession with Barbie?

Creepy isn't it? Sick IMO.

103 posted on 07/04/2013 9:29:55 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

That’s... just not right. **shudder**


104 posted on 07/04/2013 9:34:22 PM PDT by Shelayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Men who insist they are still physically attracted to their wives who have gained 45 lbs. since their wedding day, who run errands all over town in sweats, are lying... and would take up with Barbie in heart beat—if she would have him...


105 posted on 07/04/2013 10:07:25 PM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

no real women can be a barbie and be alive. the dimensions are impossible and when you remove the brain, they always die.

now, do men like attractive women? of course. do women like to look at attractive men? of course! there are objective qualities of what men and women view as attractiveness. there are some subjective ones, say a real tall person may be less attracted to a really short person, especially if the woman is taller, that kind of thing. but overall there are universal objective qualities to beauty. everyone notices and everyone looks.

i have never heard a guy as long as i have lived say he wants a girl just like barbie. i have heard them wishing for certain women that were attractive to them.


106 posted on 07/04/2013 10:14:00 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

if their wife was a freaky thin vegan on their wedding day, but started eating real food, she might look a lot better with 45 pounds and genuine curves.


107 posted on 07/04/2013 10:16:40 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
No way! This has got to be photo shopped. No human being can look like this. There's a faint line running from her left ear and across under her chin that appears as if it were drawn there. Those eyes are impossible, she looks like one of those extraterrestrials the ufo crowd calls ''the Greys'', with the big eyes. Too unnatural .
108 posted on 07/04/2013 10:54:58 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

lol, true so true.


109 posted on 07/04/2013 11:32:53 PM PDT by CONSERVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: South40

110 posted on 07/04/2013 11:53:30 PM PDT by Slyfox (Without the Right to Life, all other rights are meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

111 posted on 07/04/2013 11:58:54 PM PDT by Slyfox (Without the Right to Life, all other rights are meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

lol! Lucky Ken.


112 posted on 07/05/2013 12:00:27 AM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

They wouldn’t fit on a Breyer horse so I ignored them.


113 posted on 07/05/2013 12:18:34 AM PDT by Salamander (.......Uber Alice!.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Barbie is a toy made by Mattel. The Huffington Post and alike drags up this story so often to blast women; in a claim they want to copy this plastic doll. They are mostly targeting the little kids. Don’t play with toy dolls. Be more generic with your imagination like the things they teach them in public schools. Most kids who played with this doll had fun and have no desires to copy her.

The doll is a toy. The Number One Barbie doll or the First Issue Barbie that was shown at Toy Fair back in 1959, to buy on the secondary market now sells from $2500.00 to $8900.00 depending if the doll has no damage and completed with box, head liner, and accessories. There is one prototype redhair Number One Barbie that sold for $50,000. The doll was never produced on line.

The doll has a long historical aspect.

The feminists have been after this doll since the 1960’s.

The leftist are pushing this story; the radical feminists because the doll conveys individually/ expression of fun and imagination/ which does not apparently fit their agenda.


114 posted on 07/05/2013 1:17:54 AM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Those kind of pictures in your post are from/made by people who detest the doll in thinking parents should not give this toy doll to their little girls because she has a proportional body size though, the size is made to FIT her clothing line so little girls and adult collectors can change the doll’s clothing. They don’t make a Barbie in jail, a Barbie who smokes, a Barbie that is risky for kids. Barbie has the healthy image the feminists are trying to distort. Mattel keeps changing the body because the feminist say that her body is too thin and girls want to be like a doll. Going on for years. The haters who make such pics and post those images on line is to attack Mattel. Don’t give them satisfaction nor help.


115 posted on 07/05/2013 1:30:27 AM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

“She would be 6 to 7’ tall...”

The Barbie doll is 11 1/2” tall (and is standing on tiptoe); this works out to 5’ 9” in high heeled shoes, not at all unreasonable for a young woman of the baby-boomer generation.

Ken and the first GI Joes were also 11 1/2” tall, or scale 5’ 9”, about average for young men in the 1950’s and early 60’s. Current GI Joe’s are 12” tall, or 6’ at 1/6 scale. More realistically proportioned 1/6th scaled figures, both male and female, are currently available.


116 posted on 07/05/2013 1:44:45 AM PDT by VietVet (I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VietVet

Red Green

117 posted on 07/05/2013 1:47:00 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
no boys do, they don’t drool over barbies. no hetero grown men drool over barbie dolls.

I do.

118 posted on 07/05/2013 2:10:28 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If illegal aliens voted (R), then the Dems would create the tightest border security in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; jacquej
Laz has offered up a couple of really good essays the past few days.

....months. :)

click on his name for his ‘in forum’ list and go read the essays. ... type in his name under ‘posters’ in the upper right search box on the mainpage.

That reminds me; I need to alter the profile page to make my editorials more accessible.

It might change your opinion of Lazamataz ...

Well hang on a tick here...

....after all, I'd still hit it.

119 posted on 07/05/2013 2:13:03 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If illegal aliens voted (R), then the Dems would create the tightest border security in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth
I killed Ken, then I hit Barbie.

But GI Joe took me out.

120 posted on 07/05/2013 2:14:36 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If illegal aliens voted (R), then the Dems would create the tightest border security in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson