Posted on 07/15/2013 8:59:14 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
This guy is nuts!
O'Reilly said tonight that crossing into the United States illegally is not criminal... but instead a civil matter.
A civil matter? What's O'Reilly been smoking???
Someone got Bill’s “Mind Right” over at Fox News. He’s definitely in the tank for Amnesty and all that...not sure what’s up. In any case, I want to see an enforcible border policy enacted and in place for three until I’ll even think about amnesty. I don’t trust the feds and that’s the case no matter who has the presidency. Ideally, we get e-verification and some sort of guest worker policy up and running. Once I see it working for a number of years...then I’ll go for some sort of amnesty. That’s just me.....
Who gives a fig what he says.
They’re not?? Well then, O Idiot, open up your house and I’ll scoop up 50 of these “good citizens” in front of Home Depot entrance right here in Hollywood as there’s at least 100 hundred of them at the entrance.
I’ll make sure to drop them off at your house. Makes sure to feed them OK?
I can only take bits and pieces of Oreilly. Little goes a long way.
It is a crime that oreily is allowed to spew his ignorance.
He is also against the Death Penalty. I quit watching him when he started defending those on death row.
He’s using a correct word — civil — in some respects, however, he’s being totally dishonest. When one says “civil matter”, they mean its up to a Plaintiff to sue a Defendant in a civil court. That’s NOT how immigration offenses work.
Its true that immigration isn’t in the list of federal criminal offenses in 18 USC, but there’s a good reason for that: immigration offenders are not US citizens — at least not alien offenders. Title 8 covers immigration and has listed in there “civil penalties,” but those penalties look an awful lot like criminal sentences - fines and imprisonment.
I look at it this way. as a conservative, of course I agree with oreilly a lot and never agree with, lets say, chris Matthews. but here’s a question I never thought to ask until now.
irrespective of whose views you agree with, who do you think is in it more for the money and less to change America?
to me the answer is Matthews cares more about transforming America, he’s probably been trying to do that since college.
oreilly was born in an America that shared his views, he never grew up with a burning desire for change.
looking at it in that light, you can see that oreilly might view things more about his ratings and not taking extreme views, which people are now starting to paint the closed border crowd with.
Well...of course not...if YOU are a ONE WORLD ORDER promoter, like O’Reilly seems to be....
Agree. He’s nuts...not watching him anymore.
civil court is generally reserved for non-violent offenses, legal issues, financial problems, family court, minor traffic issues, fines, ordinance violations. these may or may not be against another person. with civio law, usually the plaintiff is seeking compensation for a wrong, but the defendant is not up for jail time-type sentences.
crimes are usually against another person. with crimes the main point of the trial is punishment of the wrongdoer and setting the precedent to deter others from doing the same crime.
negligence or malpractice are civil lawsuits. assault, battery, murder, are criminal lawsuits.
I missed his pathetic show.
I know he’s for the Schumer-Rubio immigration bill.
I couldn’t believe what I was hearing this evening from O’Reilly. He was asking his legal analysts gals about the chances of the justice department filing civil rights charges against Zimmerman and he was completely unaware of the fact that the FBI has already investigated the racial component to Zimmerman and found nothing, zero, zilch, nada.
Not only does he appear to not know what is common knowledge to many folks, his producers and research staff don’t seem to know either. He makes sweeping generalities but doesn’t bother with the facts or details.
He keeps claiming that he is a “simple man”. I would say “simple-minded” is more like it.
He’s so arrogant. Insufferably smug. I find it difficult to understand how he still has an audience.
O-Really is a retarted Cracka - ask Jeantel
retarted did make me laugh.
I change the channel if he's on his own show.
Ted Baxter rides again.
I think he is getting in touch with his inner Whoopie. They aren’t illegal illegals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.