[nhwingut]

Wow! This is from National Journal not InfoWars. Shows you how close we are to dictatorville.

[rcofdayton]

And some in the military love the president. So what?

[Olog-hai]

They’re referencing a comment by Boykin that appeared in WND, where he said that the notion of a military coup is out of the question.

Boykin specifically said that because of the civilian-military relationship, he did not see any prospect for a “coup” coming from the military ranks.

“People I’ve spoken to would like to see the military ‘fulfill their constitutional duty and take out the president,’” Boykin said. “Our Constitution puts a civilian in charge of the military and as a result a coup would not be constitutional. You’re not going to see a coup in the military.” …

Seitz-Wald took “(p)eople” and turned it into “(m)embers of the military” . . . talk about mendacity.

[Viennacon]

Sure does.

[Hot Tabasco]

Wow! This is from National Journal not InfoWars. Shows you how close we are to dictatorville.

Excerpted from the WND......

[tbw2]

It would explain a lot of the upper level military purges. And, probably, why the military is talking about “force-outs” to push out guys before the enlistment is up, while lecturing them on white privileged.

[Biggirl]

Or much closer to a revolt.