Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Thoughts?

In all seriousness, does anyone have a recommendation for an accurate, reliable, affordable Geiger Counter?

1 posted on 03/09/2014 6:32:40 PM PDT by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: bushwon

Geiger Counter will do exactly what for you?


2 posted on 03/09/2014 6:34:08 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

“1. There is money being spent for many frivolous activities, yet three is no monitoring for radiation on the West Coast?

2. The EPA is monitoring puddles on people’s private property, yet there is no monitoring of radiation on the West Coast!”

How do you know there is no monitoring?


4 posted on 03/09/2014 6:38:59 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

Do you know why they use water to cool nuclear reactors ?


5 posted on 03/09/2014 6:39:36 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I just messed up my tagline. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

How much ya’ wanna spend?

This might be more of what you would like to have...

http://www.seintl.com/radiationalert/rad_60.html

It is good for stand alone conditions and for tracking personal dose.


6 posted on 03/09/2014 6:40:42 PM PDT by EBH ( The Day of the Patriot has arrived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

In the realm of things to worry over, this ranks around dragons and aliens.


7 posted on 03/09/2014 6:40:48 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

I highly doubt the lo levels of radiation that “arrives” will be of any consequence due to dissipation. However, if you’re worried, don’t go to the beach and if you do, stay out of the water.

One thing you won’t be able to avoid is any radiation that has been swept up into the atmosphere and precipitates down onto you. However, that has been and issue since the radiation spread into the Pacific long ago.

At our location, odds are you’d find nothing more than normal background radiation levels if you have a Geiger Counter, but I suppose I could be wrong.


12 posted on 03/09/2014 6:42:35 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon
Thoughts:




14 posted on 03/09/2014 6:43:49 PM PDT by arderkrag (An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon
Incredibly, the article states that there is no federal agency which currently samples Pacific Coast seawater for radiation.

Maybe no federal agency samples seawater but lots of private companies, universities (e.g. University of Washington) and even national laboratories partially funded by the federal government (e.g. PNNL) do from time to time. Certainly they'll be out there in the coming months.

18 posted on 03/09/2014 6:46:42 PM PDT by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

Fukushima radiation is an issue to be sure.

But compared to all the radiation we unleashed in the 40’s,50’s and 60’s I wonder if its not just “more of the same”

http://fukushima-diary.com/

The above often gets way more detailed than I need/want but it sure does track this issue without letting up.


19 posted on 03/09/2014 6:47:03 PM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon
I want you to consider all the nuclear testing that has happened in the Pacific. PLEASE, enough with the OH NOES! OMG! EVERYBODY PANIC! stuff.


21 posted on 03/09/2014 6:50:26 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon
If you're worried about that, don't ever get in an airplane or go to Denver.

It will be so diluted by the time it gets here it won't be 10% of having an X-ray.

29 posted on 03/09/2014 6:57:02 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

Don’t need a geiger counter. If it’s preceded by a squad of giant cephalopods (squid) you can bet it is imminent...


30 posted on 03/09/2014 6:57:08 PM PDT by Texicanus (Texas, it's a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon
I use a Mazur-PRM 8000. Its $450.08 on Amazon with Prime. They have a PRM-9000 but its $562.00. I know they are pricey but the 8000 is more rugged albeit not as sensitive as the 9000. They both are good professional grade instruments. You probably will need the accessory cord to download the data that they can log. Follow the comments for getting and setting up the software, its free. Download the user manual and set it up in a 3 ring binder to get used to using the Mazur. Do your own study on units and exposure limits so you don't get prematurely excited.

I am curious by nature and always wanted one. Its sort of a hobby. Oh btw you don't have to wait till next month. The videos regarding some beaches in CA seem to be accurate. Something is here. The source is unclear insomuch as there is a nuclear waste the dump south of the Farralone Islands.

http://www.amazon.com/Mazur-Instruments-PRM-8000-Handheld-Radiation/dp/B005TDE3X8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1394415934&sr=8-1&keywords=prm+8000

http://www.amazon.com/Mazur-Instruments-PRM-USB-Geiger-Counter/dp/B006T6T398/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1394416129&sr=8-9&keywords=prm+8000

34 posted on 03/09/2014 6:59:01 PM PDT by Polynikes (What would Walt Kowalski do. In the meantime "GET OFF MY LAWN")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

I’m at over 9,000 feet on the Rockies and probably get much more natural radiation than you’ll get there.


40 posted on 03/09/2014 7:09:19 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

The key phrase is “very low levels”. I was sort of mildly concerned about this since I live in Oregon, and read some of the sky is falling articles that are out there about it. I asked my cousin and my number 2 son about what they are hearing. Cousin is a former Navy Nuke and works in the industry. Son is a current Navy Nuke training on a reactor in New York. Neither of them are particularly concerned about the levels of radiation we are likely to see.


42 posted on 03/09/2014 7:16:42 PM PDT by Busywhiskers ("Once you have wrestled, everything else in life is easy" -Dan Gable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

Gov Brown will see that the legislature bans it from reaching the shore.


48 posted on 03/09/2014 7:31:54 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ("There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

Yep, this is a conservative site, but note how quickly so many call for government action at such a time as this. Gonna have to go looking for nuclear regulation in the Constitution.


49 posted on 03/09/2014 7:36:03 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

This inane Fukishima radiation panic amuses me to no end. There is about 352,670,000,000,000,000,000 gallons of water in the world’s oceans. Let’s conservatively just take the water attributed to the Pacific ocean. That is 187,000,000,000,000,000,000 gallons. About 300,000 tons, or 72,000,000 gallons, of contaminated water (most of it very low level radioactive) were released by Fukushima. If you do the math, that is one part in 2.6 billion. In reality, it is much much smaller than that, because only a tiny amount of radioactive particles were in that water.


50 posted on 03/09/2014 7:37:24 PM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

Forget about the Geiger counter. What you need is iodoral. http://www.amazon.com/Iodoral-Potency-Potassium-Supplement-Tablets/dp/B000WG3FU4


51 posted on 03/09/2014 7:39:18 PM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie; clamper1797; EggsAckley; expat_brit; hedgetrimmer; Jack Black; jahp; Regulator; ...
CЯUZIO
>> PING <<
Send FReepmail if you want on/off the SANTA CЯUZ COUNTY CA ping list
Click for Santa Cruz, California Forecast
This is why we can't have nice things
The List of Ping Lists

52 posted on 03/09/2014 7:40:49 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson