[yarddog]

Remington had basically the same thing 150 years ago except it wasn’t powerful.

[Blue Collar Christian]

Not so new....derringer.

[Billthedrill]

Crikey, that thing would be a handful in .45 ACP. I want one.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

For the same price you could have a real gun.

[yarddog]

I could see it maybe in .380. Anything more powerful would hurt.

[umgud]

You can get a lot of 9mm pocket guns not much bigger, but this thing does look cool and may be more ergonomic than many typical derringers.

[SkyDancer]

Rather have this:

[Clint N. Suhks]

Very interesting.

The “GunTalk” ping list may be interested.

[Clint N. Suhks]

“15-ounce weight”

Nevermind.

[The Cajun]

Out of their minds for that price.
9mm or .380 pocket semi autos make more sense and you
can deliver a lot more than 2 shots for close to the same price.

[yarddog]

If you have to have something smaller than, say a Walther PPK, then it might make sense. It doesn’t look like it should be that expensive to make so maybe a similar design could be made which functions well for only a $180 or so.

My Caliber of choice? .32 H&R magnum. Then you can use several different cartridges in it according to how much recoil you could stand.

[Boomer One]

New version will be out in .410 whereas current models are in 9 mm and .45. Because of the slim profile, I have some interest in this gun. Just got a Glock 42 and had some issues in 2% of the firings while breaking it in. Simplicity of this gun also appeals as there is little to go wrong. Hope to have an opportunity to try one in a few weeks.

[Eagles6]

Novelty gun. About as big as a .38 snubbie or a .380 or 9mm pocket pistol so why bother?

[Tainan]

Gerber Mark I

[Patriot365]

Oh Boy! 27 lbs. of trigger pull. That will drive tacks all day long.(sarc)