Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vasectomy linked with aggressive prostate cancer risk
Medical News Today ^ | 10 Jul 2014

Posted on 07/11/2014 10:59:41 AM PDT by KeyLargo

Vasectomy linked with aggressive prostate cancer risk Thursday 10 July 2014 - 3am PST Prostate / Prostate Cancer Men's Health Cancer / Oncology

In the largest and most comprehensive study of its kind, researchers from Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, MA, find that vasectomy is associated with a small increased risk of prostate cancer, and a larger increased risk for advanced or lethal prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the US, where vasectomy is a common form of contraception, with around 15% of American men having the minor procedure, which blocks the tubes that carry sperm from the testicles to the penis.

The researchers report their findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, where they note that the link was still evident among men who had regular PSA tests, suggesting the link with increased risk of lethal cancer cannot be due to diagnostic bias.

Co-author Lorelei Mucci, associate professor of epidemiology at Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), says:

"This study follows our initial publication on vasectomy and prostate cancer in 1993, with 19 additional years of follow-up and tenfold greater number of cases. The results support the hypothesis that vasectomy is associated with an increased risk of advanced or lethal prostate cancer."

For the study, Prof. Mucci and colleagues analyzed data on 49,405 American men who were followed between 1986 and 2010 as participants of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. The men were aged between 40 and 75 years at the start of the 24-year follow-up period.

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalnewstoday.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Reference; Science
KEYWORDS: cancer; menshealth; prostate; vasectomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2014 10:59:41 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

When Celebrities Get Prostate Cancer
14 Famous Men Who Battled Prostate Cancer
Cancer doesn’t care if you’re rich and famous: Not even stars like Robert De Niro or Sir Ian McKellen are immune

http://www.everydayhealth.com/prostate-cancer-pictures/famous-men-who-battled-prostate-cancer.aspx#/slide-1


2 posted on 07/11/2014 11:03:43 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Must say I have often wondered if there was a link.


3 posted on 07/11/2014 11:05:03 AM PDT by Gamecock (There is room for all of God's animals. Right next to the mashed potatoes and gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Glad the article got to this point:

“In this study, 16 out of every 1,000 men developed lethal prostate cancer over 24 years of follow-up. Thus, the result that vasectomy was linked to a 20% raised risk of lethal prostate cancer, is relative to that 16 out of 1,000.”


4 posted on 07/11/2014 11:08:05 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Its a warning from mother nature don’t mess with her


5 posted on 07/11/2014 11:11:20 AM PDT by al baby (Hi MomÂ…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Not relevant,not as important as breast cancer.


6 posted on 07/11/2014 11:18:22 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Even though I agreed to have it done, I felt deep-down (not just religiously), that it was the wrong thing to do. I definitely regret it now.


7 posted on 07/11/2014 11:29:52 AM PDT by Thorliveshere (Minnesota Survivor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere

My wife understands that contraception is her problem, not mine. She never had a problem with that.


8 posted on 07/11/2014 11:39:40 AM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Interesting. I think it is the Chinese who consider cancer to be a disease of stagnation. Blocking the tubes would be like blocking a stream which would lead to stagnation.

I have read that a womans bra (if too tight)can block certain ducts and that can cause stagnation and thus cancer too.


9 posted on 07/11/2014 12:01:59 PM PDT by Paytriot (Live long and prosper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paytriot

My husband didn’t have a vasectomy and no one in his family has had it, and he got prostate cancer at 50.

He was even vegan for the 3 years prior to that in an effort to lower his cholesterol, and prostate cancer loves fat.

Don’t know why he got it.


10 posted on 07/11/2014 12:05:50 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

Other theories are when guys carry their cellphones in their pockets. Or that the prostate gets burned out from porn addiction (not to accuse your Husband of course). It has been suggested that the slowing of the sex drive (less sex in later years) leads to a stagnation as well. I am constantly hearing commercials about prostate cancer this and that and even have to wonder if that has something to do with it (a mind over matter type thing ((or auto suggestion)) He whom you fear awaits you, comes to mind. Dunno, but I am of the age to have to wonder now.


11 posted on 07/11/2014 12:36:53 PM PDT by Paytriot (Live long and prosper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

First rule of medicine is do no harm.


12 posted on 07/11/2014 1:10:24 PM PDT by Bizhvywt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

“My husband didn’t have a vasectomy and no one in his family has had it, and he got prostate cancer at 50.

He was even vegan for the 3 years prior to that in an effort to lower his cholesterol, and prostate cancer loves fat.

Don’t know why he got it.”

Th study at the link just addresses aggressive prostate cancer and not prostate cancer risks for men.

What are the risk factors for prostate cancer?

http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/detailedguide/prostate-cancer-risk-factors

Risk factors for prostate cancer

We don’t know exactly what causes prostate cancer. But research shows that some factors may affect your risk. We are still unclear about the link between some of these factors and prostate cancer risk.

Your risk of prostate cancer may be affected by

• Age
• A family history of cancer
• Genes
• Ethnicity
• Having cancer in the past
• Calcium in your diet
• Height and body weight
• Hormones
• IGF-1 (insulin like growth factor)
• Vasectomy
• Cadmium
• Inflammation of the prostate

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-help/type/prostate-cancer/about/prostate-cancer-risks-and-causes


13 posted on 07/11/2014 3:29:33 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

My husband has none of those risk factors.

I do think he has led a very stressful lifestyle. He has been a workaholic and has never slept well or exercised. On top pf that, we have a special needs kid.


14 posted on 07/11/2014 10:23:58 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo; AllAmericanGirl44; Armen Hareyan; B4Ranch; Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi; bayareablues; ...
CANCER WARRIORS PING

This is a ping list for cancer survivors and caregivers to share information. If you would like your name added to or removed from this ping list, please tell us in the comments section at this link (click here). (For the most updated list of names, click on the same link and go to the last comment.)

15 posted on 07/12/2014 7:37:53 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You’re right. Basically, the risk of getting this is .016%! I.e., that’s about 0%!

I have reflux disease. With that I have about a .2% chance of cancer. If I progress to Barrett’s Esophagus, I go to about 5%. Much more - and frankly, most prostate cancer is minor, especially compared to esophageal cancer, which is “doom”. But even 5% is nothing to fibrillate over.

One of my uncles got it at about 75+. He died 6 years later, from other issues. Never treated aggressively, just seeds in the prostate. My dad, his brother, got it at about 70 (vasectomy), and was treated more aggressively with standard treatment, and has been clear for some years now (God willing will stay that way). Did very well with just radiation, although it was a pain to do.


16 posted on 07/12/2014 2:17:24 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Not generally as troublesome as breast cancer. Especially when women lose their breasts - and guess who doesn’t like that?

But most (I emphasize most, with a personal connection) breast cancer can be treated successfully, just as prostate can easily.


17 posted on 07/12/2014 2:19:42 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
We're talking about a disease that just 30-40 years ago men if they lived long enough would likely get but die from something else. Thus it is more common a killer now. My dad died from Prostate cancer two and a half years ago. He was about 71 when they diagnosed it and it had spread. They found it doing a physical before unrelated surgery. They gave him about three years.

He underwent radical treatment and his PSA numbers dropped below one and stayed there for about 7 years then climbed up over to over 10 and then started spiking. The doctors had told him when they saw his numbers drop to near zero that it would likely climb again but that he would most likely die of other causes. He was otherwise much healthier than they gave him credit for the Prostate in his last year and a half went back into his pelvic bone and he was on Chemo and a new drug Zytiga I think was the name about the last three months but it made him too sick to take it. In the last 2-3 months of his life it hit his brain. He died at age 83. Not so long ago many if not most men didn't live into their 80's and early to mid 70's was about the norm for non smokers. They likely had Prostate Cancer of some form and died from other unrelated issues.

I'd say if they made a study they would also link high testosterone levels to more probability and it would also make treatment more difficult as that is what Prostate cancer feeds on to grow. How much? Who knows.

18 posted on 07/13/2014 12:16:13 AM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Sadly, prostate cancer awareness is nowhere near the awareness and funding of breast cancer.

Men’s Health

Prostate Cancer

In the US, one in six men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime making it the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men after skin cancer. In 2013, over 238,000 new cases of the disease will be diagnosed and almost 30,000 men will die of prostate cancer in the US alone.

Despite these figures, the level of awareness, understanding and support for prostate cancer lags significantly behind that of women’s health causes.

A man is 35% more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than a woman is to be diagnosed with breast cancer.
One new case of prostate cancer occurs every 2.2 minutes and a man dies from the disease every 17.5 minutes.
The incidence rates are double for African American men.
If detected and treated early, prostate cancer has a 97 percent success rate.

http://us.movember.com/mens-health/prostate-cancer


19 posted on 07/13/2014 7:10:40 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
My dad and I had the same Internal Medicine doctor. Dad just waited too long to get checked. He went over 30 years without a physical till he had to have hernia surgery.

Doc started checking me at about age 50. To heck with what the Obama Panels say, early detection is the key to dealing with it especially in aggressive type. I ran into an old shipmate I also went to high school with a few years back. They had just found it in him and eradicated it.

I'm already on meds for enlargement so I'm gonna keep a close eye on it. Not really worry but realize the potential. Good thing I like tomatoes LOL.

20 posted on 07/13/2014 10:44:08 AM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson