Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No One is Born Gay
Townhall.com ^ | 9-9-2014 | Michael Brown

Posted on 09/09/2014 2:27:02 AM PDT by servo1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2014 2:27:02 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Amazing so many accepted an opinion with nothing scientific to back it up. What’s more is how amusing the born gay advocates view bisexuals as being in denial. Guess they can’t be born bisexual but can be born gay.


2 posted on 09/09/2014 2:39:01 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

I was amazed at how quickly those in the church jumped on the bandwagon of the supposedly “Gay Gene”. Only months after the the two “researchers” had announced their biased findings it was already theology amongst church lefties and they would not even speak to you about the methodology of the research or the presupposed outcomes driven by gay theory. I can understand being sick to the eye teeth of being accused of being the mean or bad guy, the homophobe but how quickly people will swap the truth for a lie is staggering!


3 posted on 09/09/2014 2:54:35 AM PDT by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Thank-you and God Bless for speaking the truth.


4 posted on 09/09/2014 2:56:02 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

very good point.


5 posted on 09/09/2014 3:13:58 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Of course! “Gay” is something you’re born with but gender is something you can choose.

It’s kinda like the leftist dogma, against creation and supportive of evolution. If they are such staunch supporters of Darwinian theory why do they want to have massive, “social welfare” programs? Shouldn’t they promote natural selection?

Other questions. Guns are bad for everyone! (except their bodyguards?) “Pro-choice” is not acceptable (life IS a choice) within the perimeter of an abortion clinic?
“Live and let live” and “tolerance” doesn’t apply to religious observances in the public square, (nor smoking, fatty foods and drink) just flag burning and gay parades?

And let’s not forget, “paper or plastic”?


6 posted on 09/09/2014 3:31:23 AM PDT by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

If people were born sodomizers, it would not change the fact that it is a disorder. People are born with disorders for a host of reasons and many remain mysteries.

If one day we all woke up to find sodomy appealing or acceptable, it would have no bearing whatsoever on whether it is intended or whether it is moral or whether it is to be considered good behavior.

In truth, it is a disorder...a disorder, of which, all associated behaviors are bad behavior. The consequences of that bad behavior, can be both spiritually and physically, harmful and deadly. The unnaturalness, alone, is a good insight into exactly why God considers the behavior evil.

Man has to be careful not to write evil into the law. Unfortunately our Supreme Court is very careless, or very deliberate, in that respect. Our blessings have ceased...the ball is in the people’s court.


7 posted on 09/09/2014 3:34:37 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

“It’s an idea with such social utility that one doesn’t need much evidence in order to make it attractive and credible.”

Boy, does that apply to a lot of current movements.


8 posted on 09/09/2014 3:43:12 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I was born naked. But when I was born I don’t remember even thinking about sex. Since I was naked I wasn’t thinking about sex, I guess I should be an asexual nudist.


9 posted on 09/09/2014 4:02:53 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Stop wishing for a perfect world. You may get it. Who will you talk to then?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Lies never help anyone in the long run.

It depends on how you define "help" and "the long run."

10 posted on 09/09/2014 4:28:57 AM PDT by Tax-chick (No power in the 'verse can stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Kind of laughable to think there might be a genetic marker that indicates one has a “fecal fascination” and will completely disregard design tolerances in favor of perverse self gratification.


11 posted on 09/09/2014 4:48:56 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Given that little boys and girls usually prefer to associate with same-sex friends (remember cooties?), is it possible that introducing children to sex at an early age would convinced them they are gay?


12 posted on 09/09/2014 5:08:36 AM PDT by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RginTN
an opinion with nothing scientific to back it up

What would change if today there were scientific evidence one way or the other?

13 posted on 09/09/2014 5:26:34 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Ping


14 posted on 09/09/2014 5:30:34 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I remember back in the early 90’s, Time Magazine ran a cover story about there being a “gay gene” and that homosexuals are “born that way.” Nowhere in the article was there one shred of hard evidence, all conjecture. Was I surprised? Hell no!


15 posted on 09/09/2014 5:45:20 AM PDT by NRA1995 (I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Even if it’s true (which it decidedly is NOT), some people are also born with a predisposition to alcoholism. Or sociopathy. Or diabetes. Those are all treated like the diseases they are and the fact that one is genetically susceptible to them does not excuse their exercise or make it more palatable. Those people are treated! No one makes a cottage industry out of defending them or forcing unafllicted people to accept their disease as “normal.”


16 posted on 09/09/2014 5:46:04 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Twin studies support this point very strongly.
http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/identical-twin-studies-show-the-only-gay-genes-that-exist-are-made-by-versace/


17 posted on 09/09/2014 5:46:37 AM PDT by Techster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

You want to know an idea with social utility? Christianity. And by extension, a rigorous ethic of honor, decency, and conscience. Yet Christianity is the favorite strawman of the social utilitarians, despite its proven value over 2,000 years.


18 posted on 09/09/2014 5:50:54 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: melsec
I was amazed at how quickly those in the church jumped on the bandwagon of the supposedly “Gay Gene”.

With attendance being down, that was a means to fill the pews......

19 posted on 09/09/2014 6:14:35 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Is there such a thing as a vegan zombie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
A few years ago there was a story about how the brains of homosexual men are slightly different from normal men. I think it was the Amygdala that was a bit smaller in homosexual men.

I wonder what the signifigance of that is. Maybe it creates extra room for other stuff, like their well-known flair for interior decoration and window treatments.

20 posted on 09/09/2014 6:18:35 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (The time is now to form up into leaderless cells of 5 men or less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson