Posted on 09/17/2014 4:36:52 PM PDT by Kansas58
Psst, hang on a second.
Check out post 639 and the responses to it as well as 878 and 879.
Kinda a “check work and see if I missed anything” request.
Yeah, we probably needed a timeout.
Okay. I’ll get on it.
Agree. Fight hard in the primaries for the conservative of your choice. But then damn well support the R candidate in the general.
Too many cry babies do neither.
Absolutely correct, Kansas. They did it with fervor and apparent glee all through the last presidential election.
So we can mark you down as being okay with being called a racist extremist tea bagger by the party leadership as well as homosexual marriage, gun bans, romneycare a.k.a. Obamacare, illegal immigration, and more liberal pandering as that is what Romney was for, same as Obama.
As well as the RINO leadership.
Voting for a RINO will only tell the leadership that you’ll vote for any POS they toss out there, your principles and beliefs mean nothing.
Actually yes I have something. The reality of the situation.
Perhaps you’d care to explain to the class how it is you are ‘not totally opposed to a fence’ when you call it too expensive, post photos showing isolated examples of a breach and complain about everything from location to maintainance? Which parts and where exactly are you good with one?
Are you saying that if we build it ‘over there somewhere’ that all those supposed dealkillers magically vanish and then it becomes viable? See, you can’t have your fence and stop it too.
Your post above is one gigantic contradiction. you spend the whole thing railing on cost and maintainance with photos ‘proving’ it is not a 100% security solution. Well, not one of us pro fencers ever said it was. It has to be combined with all that other ‘smart fencing’ tech that on it’s own has proven daily to leak like a sieve and suffers from control by Dem and GOP illegal immigrant supporters.
The next point is just what value do you put as too great a cost to achieve border security? Obama and Bhoner spend more in a given week sending foreign aid to terrorists than it would cost to build the whole thing. And their ongoing lotto giveaway would pay the upkeep a thousand times over per YEAR. The cost argument fails on all levels. There is no such thing as ‘too expensive’ in this situation if you intend to have a working solution. And fences, as article after article have shown, work.
Ultimately, as I mentioned and as others have posted to you in the past, Google lists thousands of articles showing beyond rational argument that the fences result in massive reductions in illegal incursion. Post all the tunnel rail pix you like. For every relative handful that have to save up for years to buy a ticket on the Coyote Streamliner, tens of thousands await a ladder from Rick Perry while their feet rest upon the mother soil of Tijuana.
As to the poor downtrodden landowners who can’t use their own land now without armed patrols that occasionally result in THEM being jailed for a wonton and shameful act of self defense, that’s why they get paid off. And since they can’t use their land now without fear of life, limb or imprisonment, I’d say selling it is the best deal going.
PS, we plumbed the Mohave desert from the Colorado River to SOCal (20 min from my house) so we can figure out how to get the cows water in about 30 seconds.
So, in sum, you either have to oppose the fence because you don’t want to pay for the security it provides, you are willing to have America attempt to absorb the invasion, you don’t want the lovely views of Tijuana disturbed or you’re trolling. Because since Rick’s video game only fence is a proven failure by itself and the SD fence is proven to work, you have no other options here.
Pols refuse to allow BP to repel the invaders, the military cannot be used in any capacity but ‘target’.
And ultimately, how are your efforts are no different from a full throated paid LaRaza agent? They post/promote flat out lies and propaganda about the effectiveness of the SD fence and so do you. They make excuses for why America ‘can’t’ and so do you. They use pictures like yours in media to ‘prove’ their points while in truth the fence in place today has massively reduced illegal incursion, is being paid for and thus by every definition, meets it’s express reason to exist.
The left can and does point to people doing what you do and says ‘SEE? even conservatives oppose the fence!” that being a repeatedly demonstrated fact in broadcasts across the country, how exactly are you benefiting ‘our team?” You tell me. Tell us all how demonstratedly harming the cause you claim in public is a net gain for the home team.
Yea actually ‘I got’ lots. And thats why I encourage anyone still reading this thread or anyone that may come across it to research the issue. I do not expect or want anyone to take my word for it. All the facts are out there for anyone to read.
And if you insist on talking in circles and posting the same proven tom be crap, half truths and general nonsense that flies in the face of logic and demonstrated reality, don’t be shocked when you get called on it. And to be completely honest, I really don’t care if your friends and defenders here get their panties in a bunch. If they want to defend a fantasy, it’s on their rep, not mine.
Your work is sound. It’s just that the object of your affections is another in a long line of ‘not a conservative but plays one on the Internet.’
And Rule 6 is being brought into play against you. See also the fence thing above for my own little corner of heaven.
At this rate you will have an undead thread here ;)
I’ll support the conservative candidates but I do not support a political party.
Not the dreaded rule 6?!
Noooo, it is too terrible!
Now I must wear the hollow pumpkin hat of shame!
*gets mistaken for Ichabod Crane’s headless horseman*
It’s Rule 5 for you dark. Book of Alynski, Chapter 2, verse 3.
“And Saul said, “Bringith unto them false truths and fallacy, lest the Holy chaos rein.”
Then he said it was only a flesh wound and determined the airborne velocity of an unladen awallow. ;)
Oops...typo. Meant Rule 6.
Great, bridge of doom and all that.
“Well, I don’t know. Auuuugh!”
And besides...That Rabbits’ dynamite!
Looks like you nailed all of it to me, Dark.
I need some coffee.
“Not to 50!”
Thnaks
Speaking of rabbit, have one just outside my habitrail workspace, he is drumming his paws on the curb.
What the?
Maybe his claws make a noise he likes?
Probably just a heavily bearded hipster wearing a trendy bunny suit (ponies are so last year) practicing his keyboard chops for the new $10,000 vintage analog synth he ordered from ebay to make him popular.
O wouldn’t worry much...unless he comes to the door. Then dear God, DON’T FEED HIM!!!!
Great, now the movie Donnie Darko with the rabbit suit dude came to mind.
Why did Swayze have to be the Pedobear? WTF was he thinking taking that role?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.