Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ebola in Perspective: Recent events demand a rational analysis
American Thinker ^ | 10/04/2014 | By Frank S. Rosenbloom, M.D.

Posted on 10/04/2014 10:11:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

I wrote an article in May of 2009 in response to the nearly hysterical swine flu warnings that were causing Americans to stop eating bacon with their bacon and eggs. In that article I made a tongue in cheek reference to the 1995 movie “Outbreak” and stated that if Ebola broke out here I would move to Africa and live with the monkeys. I now find myself in the unenviable position of having to explain why one or even several cases of Ebola does not constitute an outbreak and I will not proceed to rent a U-Haul for the trip to Africa.

Ebola is, of course, a serious disease and recent events demand a rational analysis. A man who traveled from Liberia to Dallas has become the first case of Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever diagnosed stateside. So far, all other domestic cases have been in US citizens diagnosed in Africa who were flown back to the US for treatment. No healthcare workers or patients in the US hospitals in which these patients have been treated have been infected with the virus. The two patients flown here in August, a doctor and a nurse infected in Liberia, were successfully treated at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta.

The CDC has stated on its Ebola web page that the risk of an Ebola outbreak in the United States is low. Public health officials and the White House have urged calm in a surprisingly sedate response that is decidedly antithetical to recommendations made regarding much less frightening maladies such as the bird flu and swine flu. So, given the historically apocalyptic predictions by the government regarding other diseases, why the rather tepid response to such a deadly disease?

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: ebola
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2014 10:11:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
[W]hy the rather tepid response to such a deadly disease?

Because it is totally the fault of the incompetent administration that it is even here?

2 posted on 10/04/2014 10:17:23 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Politically correct delusions are dangerous and elections have serous consequences. The Obama administration will spend more time and energy defending the bizarre decision to allow continued commercial air service to West Africa than they will protecting Americans from the spread of the disease.


3 posted on 10/04/2014 10:25:40 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Then again, "If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs ... perhaps you have misread the situation."

I agree that panic is not necessary but there needs to be a good, healthy dose of skepticism thrown on those in charge because it is plain to see that all the mechanisms supposedly in place are not functioning with any level of confidence.

Yes, several patients have been treated with a very high level of success and no other healthcare workers have caught the disease, at least not yet. But they were all working with a single patient in their care and had the full resources of the country at their beck and call. Can we scale that up and still keep the same measure of success? Doubtful, and that argues against complacency.

I'll throw in another quote: "actions speak louder than words." All the political speeches by the idiots in charge and the "don't worry, we have this covered" tomes from the medical establishment mean little when we watch the cluster flop in Dallas unwind.

We're on a knife edge here, folks, and confidence is low.

4 posted on 10/04/2014 10:26:00 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Kerry, as Obama's plenipotentiary, is a paradox - the physical presence of a geopolitical absence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The virus is rapidly inactivated by exposure to air, so it is not easily transmitted by droplet infection at a distance.

Like many FReepers on the bug ping list that have followed numerous ebola outbreaks for a while...this appears to be a lie.

There is a world of difference between the heartbreaking conditions in which Ebola thrives in Africa and those in the US and other modern countries.

Again, this is incredible nonchalance and hubris, especially after what we have just witnessed at the apartment in Dallas! This sort of thinking is what will get us a full blown outbreak.

We live in a modern country with excellent sanitation, thankfully making it unlikely that those of us not in healthcare will come into contact with the body fluids or waste of strangers.

Again, more hubris from someone who lives in elite circles, not the apartment slums many of these folks end up in when they first come to America. In fact, one of the challenges the CDC had was a language barrier at the apartment building!

Ebola presents us with an intrinsically much more deadly disease than the others I discussed in previous articles, with a case fatality rate that far exceeds that of any flu. Yet, the White House urges calm and the CDC deems an outbreak unlikely. What do we make of this? Many of us are understandably concerned that we are being lied to. However, while I certainly feel the White House and CDC are capable of this, in light of what we know about the epidemiology of Ebola and the low risk of a true outbreak here, there would be little point in understating an already low risk. For once, and likely accidentally, the White House and the CDC have got it right. Maybe they are just tired of making predictions that are always wrong.

I cannot believe he is playing this naïve. Somebody got to him and told him to help keep the public calm.

5 posted on 10/04/2014 10:28:58 AM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The chance of one dying from Ebola are very low so as not to be statistically significant.

More people die from the flu and malaria than from Ebola and they’re easily treatable. And with flu - preventable with vaccination.

People have to take things in perspective. A Black Death type outbreak is unlikely. We’re fortunate in the West to the extent we weren’t for centuries.


6 posted on 10/04/2014 10:32:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The government and the pharma companies don’t have a vaccine to sell and there is none in prospect that could be mass produced.


7 posted on 10/04/2014 10:36:49 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
For once, and likely accidentally, the White House and the CDC have got it right.

But the White House and the CDC are talking out of both sides of their mouths. On one hand, it's not a big deal, and on the other hand they say there will be 1.4 million cases by the end of January and are too scared to project out any further. And if they don't think it's such a big deal, then why are they sending 3,000 troops to fight it, when they've never sent a single troop to fight malaria, which kills far more people than Ebola has? Because the potential for Ebola to kill far more than malaria does is real. That's why.

Screening at the point of departure from Africa is being done.

Really?! Are you really willing to risk it based on whether or not some poorly trained official in some third world country detects a fever in a passenger? Really?! After what has already happened? If so, then you're nuts!

We know that a top Ebola virologist disagrees with this guy: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/10/03/Top-Ebola-Virologist-Liberia-s-Airport-Checks-Useless-a-Disaster-Due-to-Lack-of-Training

And this totally ignores the wide open southern border.

Voluntary restriction of apparently healthy but exposed persons to their homes for the duration of the incubation period would reduce the risk of contagion is an option.

Thomas Eric Duncan's family doesn't seem so agreeable to the idea of a "volunary" 21-day quarantine. They've had to be put under armed guard because they went out after being told not to, and are continuing to complain about it. Why would we expect that anyone else would be more agreeable to the idea?

We live in a modern country with excellent sanitation, thankfully making it unlikely that those of us not in healthcare will come into contact with the body fluids or waste of strangers.

Oh yeah?! Well there are an awful lot of people who are doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and other health care workers. Also, teachers, cops, paramedics, and firefighters come into contact with strangers body fluids ALL THE TIME!!!

And what will happen when all the available quarantine beds in a city are filled?

This guy should read up on "normalcy bias" because he's got it. Real bad.

8 posted on 10/04/2014 10:41:48 AM PDT by scouter (As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

A vaccine is expensive and requires a lot of research and testing... which can take years.

And unlike with HIV/AIDS victims, its just not a politically correct disease and won’t get top priority - unless a lot of people die.


9 posted on 10/04/2014 10:42:21 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

What we are seeing is that we don’t have a problem with the patients themselves, once they are being treated then the situation is under control.

What we are learning is how totally unprepared for bio terrorism we are as a nation, in spite of the movies and the billions, it seems that no one has actually ever looked into preparing for it at all, with the exception of the special, dedicated research and treatment connected clinics that operate as part of the laboratory system.

The schools, the hospitals, Homeland security, the Airports, everyone is reacting as though biological attack has never been thought of before.

I don’t know the list, but Anthrax, Bird flu, AIDS, all the other events, and no system was ever developed, no guidelines and procedures for schools, quarantines, transportation and all the other public gathering places and sources of interaction and exposure?

When this is over the Republicans need to stay on target and get us ready for biological attacks for the future, the way this nation prepared for nuclear war in the days when we used to get things done.

Biological warfare/terrorism, EMPs, nuclear attack, massive and simultaneously timed terror attacks, we need some serious focus on internal national defense.


10 posted on 10/04/2014 10:45:24 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
And with flu - preventable with vaccination.

Well, sometimes and partially because the vaccine is often for the wrong strain. Sunshine and/or vitamin D3 supplement is or is almost almost 100% effective against respiratory virii. My wife, a primary schoolteacher, most of my relatives, and I, and various friends who have been taking the supplements through the winter or, in my case all year as I work at night, have been entirely free of flu and colds for so long as we have been doing this. For me and my immediate relatives that is eight years. As a side effect of this practice I have discovered that sunshine and/or D3 supps are highly effective fixes for the manic depression of my daughter and a friend whom I had induced to take the D3 for her frequent colds a couple of years ago.

11 posted on 10/04/2014 10:50:09 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

Being against Eb0la is racis’.


12 posted on 10/04/2014 10:54:01 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
The sad part of all this is that with the sheer size of this outbreak, there is an opportunity for medical personnel to observe for non-obvious vectors and previously undocumented means of transmission of the disease.

Apparently, dogma is standing in the way of recognizing what is occurring, and that the virus may be fomite bourne and infect has become evident. It is also highly likely that the virus travels in the air in droplets of bodily fluid, sprayed washwater, etc. for greater distances than previously thought and with greater infectious potential.

This might explain some of the deaths of medical personnel in Africa. The three foot standoff zone may be woefully inadequate for those who are unprotected.

Failure to recognize discrepancies between previous outbreak observations and data from the larger present sample will lead to more infected and dead, in the medical profession and outside of it.

This isn't cause for panic, but unless those in the medical profession and the agencies setting policy recognize in a timely fashion when current protocols are simply not working, and will adapt those protocols to ensure protection from newly recognized aspects of the threat, the potential for unnecessary losses of medical and other personnel will be significantly higher.

13 posted on 10/04/2014 10:54:14 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
The sad part of all this is that with the sheer size of this outbreak, there is an opportunity for medical personnel to observe for non-obvious vectors and previously undocumented means of transmission of the disease.

Good point. The problem I see is that CDC, WHO, and other "authorities" will never change their preconceived ideas about how it is and is not transmitted without peer-reviewed double-blind studies and journal articles. And by then it will be too late. And perhaps even then they won't change their minds. Their tendency under these circumstances is to view what they know as "settled science" and not to even ask the question "is it true that it can't be spread across the room?"

Normalcy bias.

14 posted on 10/04/2014 11:08:56 AM PDT by scouter (As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dr. Rosenbloom, you are an uninformed idiot. Suggest you sign onto the Free Republic Ebola ping lists to keep up to date.


15 posted on 10/04/2014 11:14:32 AM PDT by Veto! (OpInions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Concur, big time


16 posted on 10/04/2014 11:20:21 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Kerry, as Obama's plenipotentiary, is a paradox - the physical presence of a geopolitical absence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

You should tell that to the passengers on United 988.


17 posted on 10/04/2014 12:04:21 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scouter

Excellent assessment of the article, also I read here on FR the gov’t has most recently ordered multiple thousands of those bio-suits.


18 posted on 10/04/2014 12:05:12 PM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Risk is probability AND consequence.

The consequences of contracting ebola is very frequently death. In the U.S. the probability of contracting ebola is very low. The risk of death from ebola for anyone in the U.S. is very low.

The consequence of contracting flu is very infrequently death. In the U.S. the probability of contracting flue is moderate. The risk of death from flu for anyone in the U.S. is very low.

The risk of death from flu is not likely to change. The risk of death from ebola could increase quickly if infected persons are not quarantined or prohibited from entry from hot zones.

ebola mortality rate 70% ( http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1411100#t=article )
flu mortality rate 0.0005% ( http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/flu.htm )


19 posted on 10/04/2014 2:27:25 PM PDT by Ray76 (We must destroy the Uniparty or be destroyed by them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

The incubation period for ebola can be up to 21 days.

That means that every person arriving in the U.S. from an infected country may not exhibit symptoms until weeks after arriving in the U.S.

In Texas an infected person did not seek care immediately. Their initial visit to the hospital was not handled properly, presumably such events will not be repeated. But there is still the time between symptoms appearing and aid being sought.

In my opinion this is a ticking time-bomb. Everyone arriving from an infected country must be tested. There is no reason not to when the consequences are so high.


20 posted on 10/04/2014 2:43:56 PM PDT by Ray76 (We must destroy the Uniparty or be destroyed by them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson