Posted on 12/11/2014 7:49:51 AM PST by SeekAndFind
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer special. For those remembering how they stared with wonder and awe at the jerky stop-motion animation and shivered with delicious fear at the perils faced by the plucky buck with the incandescent schnoz, the notion that this program occurred a half century ago would be a marvelous testament to the enduring power of the shows appeal . . . if it didnt make you feel so damned old.
If it does, that is. For young kids today its a cultural artifact from a time so remote it might as well be the Renaissance. The snowmans resemblance to Burl Ives doesnt make them think of a hefty folkie howling with alcoholic rage in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof; the concept of a misfit doesnt echo a decade of neurotic intellectual culture celebrating the outsider who couldnt find his place in the grey-flannel machinery.
Its charming and tuneful and justly revered. So lets spoil it by overthinking the details and applying the corrosive idiocy of modern standards, shall we? Herewith a few points to consider.
If its been a long time since you saw it, youre struck immediately by one jarring fact:
Santa is a jerk. When Rudolph is born in the spring, Santa wanders over to the cave where his parents live never mind the fact that Santas employees live in unheated holes and he uses the opportunity to sing a song about himself being the King of Jing-A-Ling. You get the idea that its all about Santa up in Christmastown, 24/7/52/365 a fact underscored by the next scene, when the off-season elves have convened to pledge fealty in song form. We Are Santas Elves rivals North Korean fealty-pageants in its naked self-abasement. We have no individual identity, only collective identification as property of the employer.
Later he sees Rudolph perform a remarkable act of aerial maneuvering unknown for a young reindeer, but upon discovering the nasal deformity he tells his father he should be ashamed, presumably for carrying a genetic defect an ultrasound would have revealed.
The truth about Yukon Cornelius. We knew he was a prospector, and we assumed he was looking for gold. No. Peppermint. This fact was trimmed from the final version, but they left in a scene where Yukon licks the tip of his pickaxe, if you will, and expresses disappointment. This confounded any kid who did not know that the presence of gold could be ascertained by ones taste buds, but, well, prospectors knew things. When you know he was looking for peppermint, it makes sense.
Still, your rational brain shoulders aside delight and wants to know what sort of idiocy this is. Peppermint, as an extract, is added to sugar to make confection. There are no vast underground deposits of red-and-white-striped Cane ready for industrial extraction, and even if there were, experience with the stuff leads you to believe that it would shatter upon contact with the most rudimentary form of mining equipment. If it was a commodity, surely it would be subject to wild cyclical price fluctuations depending on the season.
Let us, however, posit that it was a valuable substance with a significant market. Cornelius (if that was his real name; the use of a nickname Yukon indicated he was comfortable with malleable identity, and may have been using a false name to avoid retribution from those who had backed earlier unsuccessful operations) was prospecting near the North Pole, given his proximity to Santas manufacturing facilities. We dont know the extent of Santas holdings, and its possible that the discovery of a major vein of peppermint would only result in years of litigation and discovery motions, the end result of which would be an invalidation of Santas property rights by a U.N. body that declared the area international territory.
That would last about two years until mysterious fascist attacks on Russian-speaking elves prompted Putin to annex most of Christmastown and confiscate its industrial base.
Kids today are appalled by the brusque coach who regards Rudolph as a freak and clearly sides with the normal reindeer youth. Nowadays the character would recognize Rudolphs specialness right away, and the entire show would have been about his fight to get Rudolph on the team, culminating in an impassioned speech before a congressional committee and the passage of Rudolphs Law.
By the way, when I was a kid we understood the coach characters nasty reaction not because we sympathized with him, but because phys-ed teachers were jerks.
The Abominable Snowman. Let us be frank: The moment when Rudolph sets out on a floe to draw the Snowman away from his friends is one of the more noble moments of childhood television, married with dismay: You know he had no chance. To a small child who has finally grasped the narrative, it was really scary, because Rudolph was going to die.
Parents watching along may have wanted to say See what happens when you run off with your weird friends? This is what happens. You break your mothers heart and your intestines are slurped up by a murderous albino.
Of course, Rudolph didnt die. Oh sorry. SPOILER. Rudolph found his mom and future breeding partner cornered by the Abominable Snowman, whose mindless hunger somehow manifested itself in roaring and gesturing but not in rending and eating. With Yukons help, the monster was banished and here is where some moderns complain about the way the drama reinforces archaic gender notions. One of the articles about the shows enduring appeal rolled its eyes at the line about protecting the womenfolk. A modern version would have Clarice using a flurry of kung-fu to stun the monster, after which Rudolph would do something geeky say, wiring his nose to transmit an electric shock and then his mom would deliver the coup de grace while saying some mom thing that was a cliché in ordinary circumstances but totally kick-ass here. Careful when you step outside, Bumble. Youll catch your DEATH of cold.
And then they would see to Yukon, who had been wounded at the start of the fight.
When you think about it, though, letting Yukon and Rudolph take on the monster might make sense. Even if it was patriarchal. Cornelius had a sharp weapon. Rudolph had pointy, stabby horns attached to his head. Id give those guys the first shot.
We all thought Yukon died when he went over the cliff, but as we all know now, Bumbles bounce! Really? A fall from that height would have led to severe internal organ damage as well as spinal injury; at the very least, to a massive concussion. If Bumbles did indeed bounce, Yukon would have been thrown a great distance and dashed against rocks or an icy protrusion. Apparently he survived, though, and instead of using the opportunity to escape, or use his pickaxe to kill the creature while it was stunned, he considered the possibility that the beast was motivated by dental discomfort, which is like the SEALs who burst into bin Ladens lair inquiring whether his worldview was darkened by persistent hemorrhoids.
No matter! Alls well that ends well, and Rudolph was promoted to the head of the team. The first time you saw it, you thought that was the end but then there was more! After the commercials! You saw Santa and the reindeers dropping off the toys from the Island of Discarded Production Runs, happy they were getting a home. Because thats what mattered. Because it was Christmas.
It would be years later before you thought of a dad watching the kid play with a train with square wheels, wondering where that came from, and turning to his wife. Honey, he whispers. Did you save the receipt?
James Lileks is a columnist for National Review Online
But Moore originally wrote it as Donder instead of Donner...why the change I have no idea.
And I educate myself, from Wikipedia:
In An American Anthology, 17871900, Edmund Clarence Stedman reprints the 1844 Clement Clarke Moore version of the poem, including the German spelling of “Donder and Blitzen,” rather than the original 1823 version using the Dutch spelling, “Dunder and Blixem.”[1] Both phrases translate as “Thunder and Lightning” in English, though German for thunder is now spelled Donner, and the Dutch words would nowadays be spelled Donder and Bliksem.
“Santa is a jerk”
What isn’t well known is he likes to eat reindeer.
If you cannot pull the sleigh then your are dinner.
Good article. :)
The message I got was that even a "freak" like RRNR had a marketable skill.
Norelco was strictly a US brand name. In Canada and elsewhere the shavers were called Philishave but we saw the ads here too.
from wiki
History of the name[edit]
From the early 1940s, Philco was legally able to prevent Philips from using the name “Philips” on any products marketed in the USA, because the two names were judged to sound similar and that it may cause litigation. As a result, Philips instead used the name Norelco, an acronym for “North American Philips [electrical] Company.” Philips continued to use that name for all their US products until 1974, when Philips purchased The Magnavox Company. Philips then relabeled their US consumer electronics products to the Magnavox name, but retained the Norelco name for their other US products. When Philips bought Philco in 1981, Philips was able to freely use the Philips name for all of their US products, but they chose to retain the Norelco name for personal care appliances, and the Magnavox name for economy-priced consumer electronics.
One reason for retaining the Norelco name for personal care appliances was that a shift to the Philips name could have alienated those US buyers who were reluctant to purchase foreign brands. The market share of Philips, a European company, was very low in the US compared to other countries; with their Norelco and Magnavox brands, they were able to get a larger market share.[1]
Philips began co-branding their shavers “Philips Norelco” in 2005 to improve Philips brand recognition in the USA, a first step towards an intended phase out of the Norelco name.
It’s just a shiny nose, it’s not like it stopped him from regular reindeer stuff. But they hated him, all the way up until the Fat Man declared him cool.
Too funny ;)
Yes, poor old Rudolph was hated and kept from the reindeer games. Just like the fat kid always gets picked last for the playground team. And the teen with pimples never gets the girl.
Part of the message is that life is not fair. And you seem to have taken away that -- and only that -- message.
But how about the rest? That even the pimple-faced fat kid, who nobody wants to play with, can have a marketable skill and "shine" in America?
The message is pettiness is OK. Even Rudolf’s father is ashamed of him. Part of the problem is that the other reindeer are basically a nameless rabble. So it doesn’t portray them learning they were wrong, they just accept him once Santa (who also didn’t like him until that nose seemed useful) does. That really is the ONLY message: be liked and get liked.
There is no “rest”. And frankly your attempt to find one goes back to the basic problem of the story. Who cares about marketable skills? He’s looking for FRIENDS, he’s just a kid looking to participate with other children, he’s not looking for a job. The story winds up justifying the bad behavior, in the end they were right to hate him. It’s just plain not a good story, it sends the exact opposite message it purports.
..for my fellow dullards, he “went down in history”.
I have all the claymations and watch them each year. And cry.
We all have a place that we go that brings up the past. Santa story and Rudolph do it to me.
Frosty is pretty good too.
I like Frosty, too.
Isn’t there a scene where he and little Karen are lost in the North Woods and he takes her into a green house to keep her warm ... even though he’d melt.
Now why anyone has a greenhouse in the North Woods ... can’t answer that.
Well I live in the northwoods and dream of having a greenhouse so I am not paying though the nose for greens in the winter.
Iceland is filled with green houses heated by steam from their volcanos
Well, personally I always liked the movie. Watched it every year as a kid. It’s subtly sinister message didn’t mess me up in the least. To the contrary. I turned out to be a successful, productive and, dare I say, relatively wealthy citizen. And I *was* Rudolph in grade- and high-school!
Figuratively, of course. But I found my shiny red nose and, despite not having a powerfully influential fat friend like Santa Claus, thrived as a misfit can do only in America....
So what’s your take on “The Grinch Who Stole Christmas”?
In a message to the Senate, March 1, 1886, declining to furnish papers on file relative to suspensions from office during the recess of that body, President Cleveland said, And so it happens that after an existence of nearly twenty years of an almost innocuous desuetude these laws are brought forth, apparently the repealed as well as the unrepealed, and put in the way of an executive who is willing, if permitted, to attempt an improvement in the methods of administration.
He referred particularly to a statute passed by Congress in 1867, during President Johnsons administration, enacting that in cases of suspension from office during a recess of the Senate, the President should report, within twenty days after the next meeting of the Senate, such suspension, with the evidence and reasons for his action in the case. The message of President Cleveland was called forth by a resolution of the Senate censuring the Attorney-General for his refusal to transmit certain papers relating to suspensions from office, as requested by the Senate, particularly in the case of George M. Dustin, attorney of the United States for the southern district of Alabama.
from S.A. Bent, comp. Familiar Short Sayings of Great Men. 1887.
Rudolf has a very typical problem for “accept the weird kid” stories, by making the weird kids the POV character their acceptance winds up being tied to something external. They always do something that makes one character change their mind, so then everybody does, but looked at straight on that message winds up being “get a powerful friend, get more friends”. If the POV character was one of the bullies, and we got to see them reconsider the oddball it would be a much better message. But also a lot harder to write. Which is why nobody does. I wouldn’t say the message is sinister, it’s just poorly executed and not really what they want it to be. Of course since we all grew up seeing this same message poorly structured the same way we kind of pretend they succeeded, you’ve got a to look at these stories slightly detached to see they really don’t.
Dr Seuss usually more thoroughly considered his messages and how they should be related. Notice in Grinch it’s the POV character who goes through the change, so we get to go through the realization with him and know why it happened. As opposed to Rudolf where the only clue we have to why everybody likes him now is Santa found him useful.
Well, we don’t agree on the movie, but I have to say you’ve put a lot of thought into it and give an excellent exegesis. Much more so than I ever did. I simply liked the movie as a kid and just let it go at that. So I’m surprised anyone has put so much thought into a thirty-year-old kids movie. (Do you have a literary background, or are you just well rounded? i.e., not a victim of public education?)
I hope in your real life you are involved in something important, that affects us all. You have a impressively fertile, analytic mind, which puts you light years ahead of the dregs currently running the nation (into the ground).
Also, I hope the fact that I have never bothered, nor cared, to analyze RRNR as deeply as you will not hold me in bad stead, and preclude me from joining in any FReeper games. :)
On Language; The Penumbra Of Desuetude
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/10/04/magazine/on-language-the-penumbra-of-desuetude.html
Ok, it’s a real word. But I ain’t gonna use it! :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.