Alissa Starzak Can Explain Much More Than Alissa Starzak

Conservative Treehouse ^ | Dec 25, 2014 | Sundance

[Ray76]

When asked to explain my belief that Obama’s presidency was a construction created from approximately 10 years of pre-thought exquisitely planned detail, many people are puzzled by my reasoning.

If you peel back the layers to the Milli Vanilli roadshow – what you will notice is the strategy of putting specific ideologies into the legal affairs offices of all the “non-political” constructs. The Pentagon office of legal counsel, for example, can handcuff the activity of the Pentagon with legal opinion in opposition to the traditional goals of the organization (See Jeh Johnson).

Likewise the CIA office of legal counsel, can have a similar impact on actual outcomes and steer policy. If you want to find out what’s more consequential than the proverbial executive ‘pen and phone’, get to understand the legal counsel who can stop any activity they desire just by writing adverse legal opinion. The legal opinion does not need to meet the criteria of professional review to block activity – indeed most of the time it would be shredded by exterior legal analysis – their goal is not legal standing per se’, the goal is policy influence.

[DiogenesLamp]

Great post Lucy,all this was planned years ago and is being done incrementally and the chaos is unending.right now it occurrs approximately every two weeks.

I think people give them too much credit. The only essential ingredient in the "plan" was a black guy who could pass for competent. (which he isn't.)

I said back in 1992 that our next presidential candidate needed to be a black guy. (I was favoring Alan Keyes at the time) I *KNEW* he would get an automatic 60% of the black vote, and if he just got an ordinary Republican vote, it would have put him over the top in a landslide.

The media would have had much of their wings clipped in regards to the nastiness they would have been able to direct at him, and he would have won hands down. He could have been able to enact an actual conservative agenda, and there would have been far less pushback against him than there would have been against a white President.

Any efforts to thwart his will would have been hammered with the "Racist" hammer, just as Barack has been getting away with for a long time.

My point is this. There is no particular brilliance in any "plan" to get Barack Obama elected. The only essential ingredient is a Black guy who is passably intelligent and well placed enough to secure the nomination. We could have done this first, and the Liberals would then be pitching a b**ch about how a secret conspiracy pushed this guy into power.

If people had listened to me, we would have done immense good to the nation by beating the Liberals to the punch, but instead we let them do it first.

[left that other site]

I personally believe that this has been in the works since on or before August 4th, 1961, if you catch my drift.

The proximity of William Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, and other communist celebrities all during Barry’s childhood, the ease with which his “family” moved from country to country (even as these nations such as Indonesia and Kenya were experiencing political upheaval and unrest), and the sealing of birth and school records would indicate (to ME, anyway) that this is a coordinated effort that goes back at least forty years.

And I am not really into wearing a tin-foil hat.

Every president from Washington to even Klintoon has a paper trail, school records, work history, and people who remember them in school or other employment.

Not so with obama. We don’t even know what his REAL name is!

[Myrddin]

Jackson's son would likely have been married to Moochie and run for President if he had not become a drug addict.

[Kenny Bunk]

The second I heard The Marvelous Magic Marxist Mulatto MF from Mombasa address the 2004 Democrat Convention, somehow I knew the fix was in, sort of a replay of the ominous sweaty, itchy, nauseous all-over feeling I got when JFK gave the keynote address at the Democrat convention in '56.

The guy is the perfect tool for the job of Deconstructing Amerika. He could bugger the Thanksgiving Turkey on the WH Porch, and still no one would dare criticize. Nowadays, the Melanin Force-Field is a much more powerful shield than a coating of mere Teflon.

[RaceBannon]

good find

I stand by my account :)

[Seizethecarp]

The behavior of Barry’s team and circumstantial and other evidence as well as your hearsay testimony and the alleged hearsay testimony of Barry’s step-granny points to a Kenya birth, IMO as a retired forensic investigator!

Let’s hope that Arpaio and Zullo have, at last, obtained evidence and testimony that can be brought before a federal judge and/or Congress under the federal rules of evidence and/or Congressional Rules.

[Plummz]

Ties back in to Barry O and Deval Patrick giving the same speeches / rhetoric several times over the 20-aughts decade.

[Brown Deer]

[no-to-illegals]

Nathan, cannot disagree with one word. Back during my younger time I became curious as to how entrenched the left was on the particular campus was attending. Ran a few stances in a couple of classrooms to gain a reputation as a liberal willing to speak up for leftist causes. Was surprised to find people seeking me out for additional leftist causes. This campus was/is located inside a strong Conservative district but the liberals found me quickly and as began to look deeper found that the ones seeking me out were in the favor of many of the campus professors. Remember an American History test especially. One of the questions, on the test, had no definitive answer but left one having to lean left to attain the answer the professor took to be the correct answer. I answered the question, on that test, incorrectly because I took a right stance. Was the end of seeing leftists come in my direction. Cover was blown. Organized ... yes organized beyond our wildest dreams ... Perhaps at a later time will tell of another experience encountered on that campus. Involved a shooting of a professor by a student and yes this was before the time of the outbreak of shootings.

[no-to-illegals]

Nathan, forgot something. Also on this campus was an Iranian that was extremely pro-iran after the overthrow of the Shaw. Interesting character, in regard, to current activities. Very pro-moslem was/continues to be this particular character. Remembering gives me chills and causes my hair to stand on edge along the back of my neck.

[nathanbedford]

We conservatives are at a disadvantage in so many respects. If we allege the elements of a conspiracy we are immediately discounted as McCarthy-like conspiratorialists. When the left accuses us of conspiracy, for example the Tea Party has been traduced as one huge conspiracy, the proposition and its supposed dangers to the Republic are taken up and discussed quite seriously as a respectable subject for investigation.

The evidence of widespread pattern of active discrimination against the admission and grading of conservatives on campus is so overwhelming that one is logically unable to discount a generalized theory of conspiracy on American campuses. How can this be so? Because the underlying philosophy of the left is that our system is so corrupt, so racist, so incapable of reform because of its essential evil nature, that it is illegitimate. Illegitimate, it deserves no respect, and certainly no adherence to a bourgeois sense of fair play. To play fair is to inevitably be the victim of unfair play because the game itself is corrupt.

We see the out workings of this in the history classes which my son in an elite Eastern University is taking in which any effort to view the world since 1400 as at least partly the product of the Reformation, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the scientific revolution, is actually forbidden in favor of a study of slavery, disease borne by white people, racism, colonialism, and every other conceivable approach that can be reduced to the equation people of color = good; white people = bad.

So the question is, given a generalized mindset which infests professional academia, do we have a conspiracy or a virus? The problem with either conclusion is that neither is amenable to reasoned argument because both are systems that shutdown honest inquiry. So we can no more discuss the virtues of the British Empire in the Victorian age than we can discuss the possibility that global warming is an unscientific proposition. The powers that be simply shut the argument down.

I have no doubt, no-to-illegals, that your experience undercover is truly reflective of a general mindset in academia. I experienced the same thing 50 years ago and I can only imagine that the virus (or conspiracy) has spread and deepened. As Kenny Bunk reminds us, if we add racialism to the picture we get a rationale to avoid honest debate because at the mere hint of racism all honest inquiry stops.

Diogenes lamp suggests that our salvation might lie in technology. He clearly has a point. There is simply no rational justification for making 200 young people sit in a room to listen to a professor read notes which are 10 years old as he serves up the same stuff year after year. All of this can be put on the Internet and there are great savings to be had. Technology also works in our favor a different way. We have seen students expose professors with video and audio recording of their leftist rants. The biographies and prejudices of professors are now up for study on the Internet in virtually every University with the result that the students at least to some degree are forewarned about what they are expected to believe and regurgitate. Ultimately, the forces of technology will drive the ivory tower to either reform or collapse like Babel because the present system is financially, intellectually and morally insupportable.

Meanwhile, generation after generation of young minds are figuratively brainwashed while they pay tens of thousands of dollars every year to buy a ticket into the world of commerce, a ticket which is degrading in value year after year. Generation after generation tends to vote as they are brainwashed. A whole new subject thread could be open concerning the tendency of middle, degree bearing, white, suburban Americans to vote, whether consciously or unconsciously, against their race, their class, their economic advantage, their future, their physical safety, and, most unfathomable of all, their own children.

[no-to-illegals]

the game itself is corrupt.

yes, Nathan, till that point in my life was under a mistaken belief the game was not corrupt. Was I ever wrong. It all began as a steroids investigation but what came out of the woodwork was more than two legged cockroaches.

[GBA]

Not sure which is worse: open warfare with bullets and bombs or this peaceful infiltration and transformation that will eventually take US to it.

Once the land of the free, home of the brave, we're now being transformed into entitlement zombies of the New World Oder.

Can't say we weren't warned. Sir John Glubb laid out our timeline and fate in THE FATE OF EMPIRES and SEARCH FOR SURVIVAL.

[DiogenesLamp]

A well thought out response, just as I have become accustomed to seeing from you.

[TomMore]

“Meanwhile, generation after generation of young minds are figuratively brainwashed while they pay tens of thousands of dollars every year to buy a ticket into the world of commerce, a ticket which is degrading in value year after year.”

And yet you pay, for your son to be subjected to a brainwashing environment, the result of which will be a “degraded ticket.”

Wishing him the best (and a Happy New Year for you and family!), but facing all this soon, and so ask — why?

[nathanbedford]

My son has prepaid which cost $13,000 for four years.

[nathanbedford]

Good luck to your son.

[enumerated]

“The only essential ingredient is a Black guy who is passably intelligent and well placed enough to secure the nomination. We [conservatives] could have done this first...”

I doubt that would have worked - playing the race card only only works for Democrats. Being black didn’t help Herman Cain or Ben Carson. Being a woman didn’t help Sarah Palin. Being a black woman wouldn’t have helped Condaliza Rice, had she run for office as a Republican.

Being black didn’t help Clarence Thomas get on the SC - it actually hurt - because he was a known conservative, the Left dusmissed him as an “Uncle Tom”. Just imagine what a cakewalk his confirmation hearings would have been, had he been an outspoken Leftist. There would be streets, buildings and national holidays named after him today if that had been the case.

In politics, black conservatives are considered traitors to their race - Alan Keyes would have been no different.