Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paying less than $16 per hour not fair: Aetna CEO
cnbc ^ | 1-21-2015

Posted on 01/21/2015 6:16:37 AM PST by Citizen Zed

Aetna raised employees' wages to a base of $16 per hour because paying them less was not fair, Mark Bertolini, CEO and chairman of Aetna told CNBC on Wednesday.

"Here we are a Fortune 50 company and we're about to put these people into poverty and I just didn't think it was fair," he said during a "Squawk Box" interview from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Aetna first made the announcement last week during the JPMorgan Health Care Conference. The wage and benefit hikes will impact about 5,700 workers who were making between $13 and $14 per hour.

Many of those workers were single mothers who had to rely on food stamps and Medicaid because they could not afford Aetna's health care plans, Bertolini said.

(Excerpt) Read more at mob.cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
And that would put and end to food stamps once and for all. /s
1 posted on 01/21/2015 6:16:37 AM PST by Citizen Zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Why not $160 an hour?


2 posted on 01/21/2015 6:18:24 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Offend a Christian and he is obliged to pray for you. Offend a Muslim and he is obliged to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Citizen Zed

And as of Jan 21st he’s cutting his compensation to no more than the equivalent of $20.00/hr. Right? No? Weird huh.


4 posted on 01/21/2015 6:18:51 AM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Why not $100 an hour, an all expense paid trip to Dineyland, complete healthcare package with an IRA plan thrown in so we can pay $20 for a Happy Meal?


5 posted on 01/21/2015 6:20:04 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

This is Aetna trying to be the last insurance company standing after obamacare destroys the insurance industry.


6 posted on 01/21/2015 6:22:12 AM PST by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
"Here we are a Fortune 50 company and we're about to put these people into poverty

What do you mean "put them into poverty"? Where were they before you hired them?

You've said more than you realize Mr. CEO. The sad truth is it pays more to be on government subsistence than it does to work for a living.

7 posted on 01/21/2015 6:23:25 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

After overhead and profit are added the now middle class would become the new poor.


8 posted on 01/21/2015 6:26:59 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

A socialization of risk/irresponsibility socialist has a plan? Go figure. Let’s charge more for our scam BUMP!


9 posted on 01/21/2015 6:28:09 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
we're about to put these people into poverty

Huh???? By giving them a job and offering them the opportunity to EARN a living, aren't you in fact lifting them OUT of poverty? How much more would they be earning if they had no job at ALL?

And this birdbrain is a CEO????

10 posted on 01/21/2015 6:30:51 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Pay everyone at the company the same rate he is getting.....

Aetna Chairman and CEO Mark T. Bertolini’s compensation last year was less than one-fourth the pay package he received in 2012, according to documents filed Tuesday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Bertolini was compensated $8.26 million last year, down from $36.36 million in 2012.

His 2013 compensation includes $996,169 salary, $1.38 million in non-equity incentive pay, $283,385 in “other compensation,” $4.52 million in value realized on exercising options and $1.08 million in value realized on stock vested.

Additionally, Bertolini received stock-and-option awards valued at $28 million when they were distributed last year, which will provide value in the future and depend on the company’s performance.


11 posted on 01/21/2015 6:31:08 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

And that person is a CEO. He is a stupid and ignorant individual.


12 posted on 01/21/2015 6:31:52 AM PST by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mulligan

Many CEOs are figureheads. Most of them don’t deserve their station.


13 posted on 01/21/2015 6:34:42 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why not $160 an hour?

Because that amount is stupid. If Aetna wants to raise employee wages then why criticize them for it?

14 posted on 01/21/2015 6:34:55 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

That’s his business. If he, as CEO, wants to pay each worker some guaranteed minimum salary — no matter where they live — he can do it. Time will tell whether its smart (like Henry Ford) or stupid.


15 posted on 01/21/2015 6:35:30 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mulligan
And that person is a CEO. He is a stupid and ignorant individual.

Why? The raise impacts 5700 of the 48000 employees Aetna has. The total amount of the increases in salary is probably less than the $35 million he made in salary and bonuses for 2012. It's not going to impact the company's bottom line by any appreciable amount, and may well cut down on employee turnover. It's a smart business decision.

16 posted on 01/21/2015 6:41:49 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Aetna is making a huge amount of money off Obamacare. At the expense of its customers, of course. Aetna doesn’t need to save on wage expense. That’s why its customers exist - to maintain Aetna employees in the lifestyles to which they have become accustomed.


17 posted on 01/21/2015 6:43:06 AM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

‘Exactly
Please remember this company’s chief exec flew down to meet Obola numerous times in 2009 to collude in creating Obamacare which has driven AE stock value significantly higher.
They also made sure to build in a guarantee that taxpayers would cover any ACA losses beyond 15%.
A working wage is a noble idea, but wage earning purchasing power is relevant to inflation / dollar’s value / cost of living rising due to gov’t tax and regulation burdens.


18 posted on 01/21/2015 6:45:59 AM PST by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
Aetna raised employees' wages to a base of $16 per hour because paying them less was not fair, Mark Bertolini, CEO and chairman of Aetna told CNBC on Wednesday.

Fair is paying the employee commensurate with the values of his/her production.

Paying more than the value of those efforts is harmful to the company and unsustainable unless other employees are paid less than the value of their work.

So paying an employee more than the value of their work is unfair to other workers or corporate suicide.

So the board of directors or the stockholders should demand of Mr. Bertolini an explanation of this pay raise for the company’s low wage workers. Were these employees paid less than their worth in the past (unlikely) or are they being paid more than their worth now (more likely).

Regardless it is not the typical responsibility of a CEO to determine the wages of the lowest level employees. The man is stepping out of his role which is something very dangerous for a manager to do.

19 posted on 01/21/2015 6:46:17 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Bookmark this to reference in the thread that comes after Aetna announces massive layoffs and restructuring.


20 posted on 01/21/2015 6:47:38 AM PST by webheart (We are all pretty much living in a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson