Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Civil War in color: A world in black and white brought to life
Daily Mail ^ | February 2, 2015 | Staff

Posted on 02/02/2015 7:36:34 PM PST by rockrr

Some 150 years since Abraham Lincoln outlawed slavery in the U.S., a collection of rare Civil War-era photographs have been brought to life through painstaking colorization.

February 1 marks National Freedom Day, honoring the signing by President Lincoln of a resolution which became the 13th Amendment to the Constitution and abolished slavery.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: civilwar; civilwarphotos; wbts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: wardaddy; KoRn

Yeah, I’m not a fan of Lincoln at times, there are times I think he was too much of a dictator. Heck, I think the Confederates were right on many issues, but ti play Devil’s Advocate, he did what he had to do to win the war which was his objective. If I had to play the role of Lincoln in a computer simulation, I’d do the same things he did. Combine that with the industrial might of the North and lackluster international support of the South, well this is a case where force “solved” the problem. The quotes are there where it really did not but I have to say the North got it’s way for better or worse. Like you, I think there are division now that originate from that time along with the current politics we have now. Glenn Beck, no matter if you like or hate him, he is right on one thing here, we are at a point where there are Americans so far apart in ideology where we cannot sit at the same table anymore, families split up and so on. That sounds familiar.


61 posted on 02/03/2015 9:23:40 AM PST by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-1938 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pelham; jmacusa
The United States Colored Troops fielded 178,000. The number of slaves counted in the 1860 census was 3,900,000. That’s around 5%.

But what percentage of those were military-age males? For comparison, during WW2, the US fielded 12 million soldiers out of a population of 140 million, about 8.5%, and that was damn near everyone, and even with several adjustments to make more men eligible for the draft (raising the age, lowering the physical standards, etc.) they were facing a real crisis going into 1945 with a shortage of men.

62 posted on 02/03/2015 9:44:28 AM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The South lost. Get over it, troll."-- kiryandil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ditto; X Fretensis

Don’t forget West Virginia. They also abolished slavery in early 1865, ahead of the 13th.


63 posted on 02/03/2015 9:49:01 AM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The South lost. Get over it, troll."-- kiryandil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Thanks, Forgot WV was admitted with slaver still legal, but there was legislation for a limited emancipation of those slaves in 1863


64 posted on 02/03/2015 1:41:28 PM PST by X Fretensis (IW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis
Yeah, West Virginia was an oddity. Their first state constitution set up gradual emancipation. It declared that children born to slaves would be born free, that slave under 21 would be free upon reaching age 25, and made no provision at all for slaves over 21 to be freed. After the 13th amendment was passed, West Virginia ratified it and abolished slavery totally on the same date, Feb. 3, 1865.

There's a great quote from one of the abolition advocates in the West Virginia legislature, "I discovered on that occasion as I never had before, the mysterious and over-powering influence 'the peculiar institution' had on men otherwise sane and reliable. Why, when Mr. Battelle submitted his resolutions, a kind of tremor—a holy horror, was visible throughout the house."

65 posted on 02/03/2015 2:17:10 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The South lost. Get over it, troll."-- kiryandil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Thanks.


66 posted on 02/03/2015 2:52:45 PM PST by X Fretensis (IW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I don’t know if you saw my post from a few days back. If not, here is a link as I think you will enjoy it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3251996/posts


67 posted on 02/03/2015 3:00:23 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

But of that per centage in WW2, only about one in five Americans were actual combat troops. Others were medics or in transport and supply. Conversely in the German Army the ratio was one in three. But towards the end of the war any and every German male old enough to field a weapon was sent to fight.


68 posted on 02/03/2015 3:02:33 PM PST by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

That would be my family alright. My two younger brothers, one of my younger sisters and my dad are all liberals. In fact my dad has always proudly identified himself as a socialist. I’m a former liberal cum conservative. Only my two older brothers are conservatives and of one of them I’m beginning to suspect he’s a RINO. Believe me, I know what it means to keep ones trap shut when it come to not discussing politics at family gatherings. However it always works out that the liberal side gets to mouth off and I’m told ‘’don’t start’’.


69 posted on 02/03/2015 3:11:55 PM PST by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

You’d need to have a more detailed breakdown of the 1860 census to be able to calculate how that 5% compares with the total military age cohort. There may be one available with enough digging.


70 posted on 02/03/2015 3:20:04 PM PST by Pelham (WWIII. Islam vs the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

And large numbers of runaway slaves, contrabands, were used by the US army in support and labor roles without being enlisted in the USCT.


71 posted on 02/03/2015 3:39:14 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

The stats are out there, but I don’t feel like doing that digging right right now. I’ll just end by saying that a rebellion by 179,000 slaves would be considered a pretty big deal, given that Nat Turner’s Rebellion, which spread horror throughout the south, involved less than a hundred.


72 posted on 02/03/2015 3:43:38 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

To me a slave rebellion is something like what occurred in Haiti, an uprising that involves the murder of civilians. There were only a few such incidents in America but the possibility of something like it was a regular worry after the events in Haiti.

By contrast the USCT were fighting as part of the Union Army and that’s not comparable in my opinion, it didn’t involve murder.


73 posted on 02/03/2015 4:03:20 PM PST by Pelham (WWIII. Islam vs the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: gorush

I did not. Thank you for the link! That was very moving.


74 posted on 02/03/2015 5:58:23 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Such was the tenor of the times. It’s my understanding that a runaway slave was called a ‘’contraband’’ in the sense that rather then being seen as a human being who was owned by a plantation master, an African was seen merely as property, an object.


75 posted on 02/03/2015 6:18:12 PM PST by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
That would be my family alright. My two younger brothers, one of my younger sisters and my dad are all liberals. In fact my dad has always proudly identified himself as a socialist. I’m a former liberal cum conservative. Only my two older brothers are conservatives and of one of them I’m beginning to suspect he’s a RINO. Believe me, I know what it means to keep ones trap shut when it come to not discussing politics at family gatherings. However it always works out that the liberal side gets to mouth off and I’m told ‘’don’t start’’.

I know, sometimes it is better not to stir trouble although it is a shame where we are getting to the point of dad against son and brother against brother. AT least you have one older brother with you and the RINO one could be salvagable. THe only "good" thing about RINO's is at least they are not barking moonbats.
76 posted on 02/04/2015 3:27:10 PM PST by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-1938 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

Well, my oldest brother isn’t a moon bat but he sure likes to bark. He learned to do that as a lieutenant in The Marine Corps.


77 posted on 02/04/2015 5:10:29 PM PST by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson