Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Earthquake Model Predicts a Bigger Quake: Why?
discovery.com ^ | Mar 13, 2015 12:30 PM ET | Patrick J. Kiger

Posted on 03/15/2015 7:00:21 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Earlier this week, the U.S. Geological Survey released a new study, which concluded that California faces a bigger chance of experiencing a powerful earthquake in the next 30 years than previous studies had predicted.

Non-seismologists who just glanced at the news headlines about the study -- including ours -- may have been left worrying that the risk of "The Big One" is now greater, due to some alarming change in Earthquake faults.

But the explanation is actually more complicated, though not necessarily more comforting. The upside is that recent discoveries about the nature of earthquakes and how they spread, coupled with advances in supercomputer software and monitoring technology, now enable scientists to make more accurate predictions about future quakes.

The Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, also known as UCERF3, used those conceptual and technological advances to predict that the chances of an 8.0 or greater event -- roughly, the equivalent of the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 -- rocking the state in the next 30 years has increased from 4.7 percent to 7.0 percent. Meanwhile, the chances of significant but less-than-catastrophic quakes in the 6.5 to 7.0 range actually has gone down slightly in the new forecast.

The big reason for the difference from previous forecasts is that scientists have figured out how to solve a longstanding limitation in earthquake prediction models, according to Tom Jordan, a University of Southern California professor of earth sciences and one of the study's authors.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.discovery.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Sounds about right.

And of course there there is the plate boundary.


41 posted on 03/16/2015 7:30:40 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The upside is that recent discoveries about the nature of earthquakes and how they spread, coupled with advances in supercomputer software and monitoring technology, now enable scientists to make more accurate predictions about future quakes.

The above is a pure "statement of faith", presented with zero evidence that the new models are correct.

This type of faith is the death of science.

42 posted on 03/16/2015 7:30:57 AM PDT by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

The seismic activity I’m curious about is the line of activity from off shore Eureka to Nevada. It’s a straight line of quakes. It looks like a zipper to the big one of the Cascadia fault to me.


43 posted on 03/16/2015 8:34:23 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Because......petroleum.....humans.....

Fixed it.

44 posted on 03/16/2015 8:37:18 AM PDT by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Almost April. Quake in Papua New Guinea, 7.7

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3273619/posts


45 posted on 03/29/2015 6:08:02 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson