Posted on 03/26/2015 8:07:40 AM PDT by rickmichaels
In his Saturday column Conrad Black inveighed against “militant atheists”. He called them “shabby” and “shallow”. He attacked their “gratuitous disparagements of Christianity”. I’m not sure who set Black off this time. To be sure there is a species of self satisfied nose-tweakers on the atheist lecture and debating circuit but frankly militant atheism is just so passé. The fastest growing religious identity in the world is the new atheist. We really just don’t care.
Black and others have insisted non belief is a faith in and of itself. I can’t speak for all non believers but I have neither a holy book nor hymnal. I observe no special holidays and attend no services. My atheism is simply an absence of religion in my life. Outside of leaving me a few hours to myself on Sunday mornings this absence is not some kind of void that must be filled with something else.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalpost.com ...
Thank you for posting this article. It describes me to a “T”.
He’s right. That’s how I landed on atheism, it was more of a realization than a decision. I would join something, be hot on it for a couple months and then drift away, then a few years later I’d decide to try again, lather rinse repeat. Then I really looked at it and realized I’m just not that guy, I was most at peace when I’d drifted away, so that’s where I stayed. As long as other people’s religions aren’t interfering in my life I don’t care, if you’re happy with your religion good for you, I’m happy having nothing to do with it.
You either have knowledge of the existence (hard evidence) or you don't.
There’s a crowd of atheists who have probably been around a long time but they’re not terribly vocal whose answer to that question is “don’t care”. We’ve accepted the fact that we’re just not God worshiping people and whether or not there is one or a bunch just doesn’t matter. Maybe we need a new label, Uninterestedists or something.
Christopher Hitchens was asked what he would say if he found himself standing before God after his death. He replied that he would say, “You didn’t give me enough evidence, Lord.”
Hitchens went to his grave like many others, lacking faith. I suppose if he had been Muslim—or a member of Phil Robertson’s congregation—the faithful might have murdered him in service to Allah/God.
Religion Poisons Everything.
To be religious requires faith. To assert the null hypothesis of a true atheist requires much more faith. The rational position of those without faith is agnosticism.
Most atheists if faced with the illogic of asserting that absence of evidence is evidence of absence will accept agnosticism, an open but doubting mind, instead of their faith.
False equivalency poisons discussions. Saying Phil Robertson’s congregation has killed people is an outright lie and vicious slander.
By the way, non-religion has done a pretty good job of killing people in the last 100 years (see: USSR, Nazi Germany, Red China, Cambodia, etc.).
True, but that doesn't mean that we are without clues.
Applying Occam's Razor, I've concluded that random chance does not offer a plausible explanation for the advanced structure of our DNA.
What is the alternative to chance? There is a more plausible answer...
The term I came across recently that I like is “Igtheist.” To the question, “Do you think you know for sure if any gods exist?” the igtheist answers, “What do you mean by “gods”? You have to be able to define something before you can argue whether it exists or not, so let’s get to a definition of “God” before we proceed.
Which to some sounds like you're just throwing up your hands and saying, "It's too complicated for me to understand. It must be magic."
He's filled it with himself.
I read through comments looking for something that I think needs commentary or rebuttal, and when I see it, I then look to see who wrote it. Lo and behold, here you are again.
I'm not even going to say what I was going to say. I will just mention that your commentary is consistent with the picture I have of you in my mind.
And again I pause where I feel I should say something and again, it turns out to be you.
The Atheists in power in the Soviet Union killed 20-50 million people, depending on who you are reading. The Atheists in power in China killed 50-100 million people, again, depending on who you are reading.
Suffice it to say, Christians are pikers compared to Atheists.
"Magic" is as good a word as any for much of what goes on in the Universe. I've long been aware that there are certain characteristics of our Solar system that makes life possible on Planet earth, and the other day I saw an article where they noted there are approximately 200 of these relatively unique characteristics, the lack of which would have prevented Life from developing on Earth.
At the quantum level, we have numerous weird effects (such as quantum superposition) that might as well be characterized as some sort of "magic."
Both Macroscopically, and Microscopically, we see weird and bizarre events that we simply can't explain. "Magic" is as good a description as any.
It reminds me of the atheist in the Monty Python skit who was surprised by something and he says,” Oh my lack of God!”
Faith in what? Faith in your own hubris?
Faith in your own Narcissism?
To me, Atheists have only faith in their own hubris and that is not faith in anything, thus it's no faith at all. It places "self" at the top and everything else revolves around it, so it's a total lack of faith and is therefore only basic hubris or one could describe some of them (militant) as being anti-faith. Or Faith haters..
But I see no rational way to describe Atheist thinking as a faith. It's not like mathematics. You can't have (-faith)= (faith-faith)+ (hubris)
In religious terms, you either have faith or you have no faith.
IMO
Atheist = Narcissist.
Sure, but in an essentially limitless universe, it's almost inevitable that the right conditions will be met somewhere. If I roll snake eyes 200 times in a row among a set of a hundred trillion dice rolls, it might seem amazing, but it's just random.
Well of course, you’re a flame war junky. So you’re not really looking for something to comment on, you’re looking for something to object to. And there’s very few things in this world more objectionable than the simple truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.