Not terribly familiar with the story. Why would a person have to account to the police how they acquired their vehicle?
He didnt have insurance(He admitted to that) not sure if he had his registration with him
It was not his vehicle. Nor was their any insurance or other paperwork in the vehicle he was using.
If the car isn’t titled in your name, and you don’t have insurance on it or proof of ownership, you probably should be prepared to talk to the cops as to whose it is and why you are driving it.
Used to be called “visible means of support”.
Itinerant black male, driving a Mercedes Benz? Must have had it financed for a 30 year note, or was stolen or was result of drug dealing.
license, registration and insurance please? Oh, you don’t have insurance? Oh, you don’t have registration? Oh, you’re going to buy the car?? Those were the questions the cop was asking, and while the cop was back at his car the guy got out of his car once, was told to get back in, obeyed and then a few minutes later he took off from the car. (Warrant for unpaid child support one possible reason, stolen car perhaps another??, waiting for more on the evidence)
Because he had no insurance and no registration (required by anyone owning a vehicle, especially when pulled over by the cops), which is common for someone who is driving a vehicle that doesn't belong to them........IT WAS NOT HIS CAR.
The account I read was that he was going to purchase the car from a friend............
That might be true but if not, lets see how long it takes before the MSM reports it was stolen by Scott......