Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Potemkin Economy: How the Press is hiding the holes in the economy
Pajamas Media ^ | 04/13/2015 | Tom Blumer

Posted on 04/13/2015 8:04:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The disappointing March employment report the government released on April 3 [1] finally forced the business press to ‘fess up to the truth, best summed up in words found at the Associated Press [2]: ”For months, the U.S. economy’s strength has been flagging.”

That admission takes “too little, too late” to a whole new level.

During the past several months, business scribes and broadcasters have largely pretended that all is well, constructing and maintaining a Potemkin-like facade of a prosperous economy, even as the vast majority of hard-number economic indicators turned in performances ranging from middling to awful. To prop up their false image, they concentrated most of the commerce-related news they delivered to low-information voters and low-awareness news consumers on the job market, the economy’s one supposedly strong area, and positive consumer and corporate sentiment surveys.

After the strong economic growth seen during the second and third quarters of last year, the AP, aka the Administration’s Press [3], has been especially odious in insisting that the economy is still really “robust,” while coming just inches short of declaring that President Barack Obama’s economic critics should be cowering in the corner in shame. Until the employment report, the shouting only got louder as the underlying data deteriorated further.

On February 20, the wire service’s Jim Kuhnhenn admired how [4] Obama was “taunting Republicans” over the economy. Devoid of any sense of historical irony, Kuhnhenn described an “economic recovery showing signs of taking hold” — over 5-1/2 years after the recession officially ended.

When Kuhnhenn wrote his love letter, we had already seen:

Not to be outdone, five weeks later, the AP’s Martin Crutsinger composed [11] a veritable hosanna of dishonest praise directed at Dear Leader’s economy, which he described as “sluggish,” but “one of the most durable since World War II.”

Crutsinger removed all doubt over whether he was bearing false witness when he wrote the following:

The current expansion will mark its sixth anniversary in June, meaning it will have already lasted 14 months longer than the average expansion since the end of World War II.

In referring to “months,” Crutsinger pretended that the economy has continuously expanded since the recession’s end. It hasn’t:

GDPquarterlies1Q09to4Q14

The previous expansions to which the AP writer referred were legitimate, because they were uninterrupted. By contrast, as seen above, the economy has contracted twice since the recession’s end. Its current winning streak is only three quarters. Therefore, despite what Crutsinger wrote, there will be no six-year anniversary to “mark” in June — and he has once again demonstrated why National Review’s Kevin Williamson was correct in calling him the nation’s “Worst Economics Writer” two years ago [12].

Until March’s employment report, the economy had indeed added an impressive-sounding seasonally adjusted 200,000 or more payroll jobs per month for 12 months. Though it’s a nice round number and the best such streak in 15 years, it’s still not particularly strong in historical context. More importantly, it remains far from what’s required to get discouraged and disengaged Americans on the sidelines who want to work back to work, or searching for more financially rewarding work.

ReaganVsObamaGraphicsThru69mos

As seen in the chart above, the post-recession Reagan economy of the 1980s, during which the Gipper did all of the things which Obama and his Keynesian cadre insist “don’t work [13],” after adjusting for the size of the workforce, more than doubled the job-creating performance seen during the Obama post-recession era.

By the time Crutsinger produced his false, fawning crud, there had been further weakening in durable goods orders and shipments [14], all factory orders and shipments [15], construction spending [16], and retail sales [17]. All of this has caused economists to write down their estimates of first-quarter growth to as low as the annualized 0.1 percent [18] seen at the Atlanta Branch of the Federal Reserve late last week. Even the incurable optimists at Moody’s are only expecting 1.1 percent [19].

March’s employment news was so bad that the Potemkin curtain had to be lifted. Instead of the 250,000 payroll jobs “experts” predicted — one particularly well-known analyst actually thought [20] we would see almost 300,000, and that it would mark the beginning of several “even faster gains … in the spring” — the government’s jobs report showed only 126,000 payroll jobs added in March accompanied by 69,000 in combined reductions to January and February. Far more damning, despite the nominally low unemployment rate of 5.5 percent, the job market’s malaise indicators got worse. The civilian workforce actually shrunk, and the labor force participation rate sank back to a 37-year low.

The cumulative effect of monthly declines have brought some year-over-year comparisons into negative territory [21], particularly in durable goods and total factory orders. Logically, this would seem to dictate that the producing side of the economy has given up all of the gains seen last spring and summer and reverted back to where it was last winter — or worse.

If that’s really true, first-quarter GDP, absent a strong surge in consumer spending which no one expects, seems destined to come in with a minus sign.

The only thing which seems more certain is that Marty Crutsinger and the other propagandists at the Associated Press will continue to pretend that we’re still in the midst of a six-year expansion.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: economy; media; press

1 posted on 04/13/2015 8:04:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The political elite figured out that most people will not read or understand an article like this one. Therefore, all claims are eqivalent to “he said-she said” and therefore any lie will do. The truth is for suckers.


2 posted on 04/13/2015 8:17:38 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The existing press and media are the enemies of this nation. We need to treat them like the Nazi propaganda agents that they are.


3 posted on 04/13/2015 8:18:58 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The banana republic news media still on the job DNC applauds.


4 posted on 04/13/2015 8:36:05 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“that Marty Crutsinger and the other propagandists at the Associated Press will continue to pretend that we’re still in the midst of a six-year expansion.”

All journalists are propagandists. There is no basis for the presumptuous assumption of “journalistic objectivity.” None.


5 posted on 04/13/2015 8:37:02 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The unemployment numbers can be massaged, welfare can be disguised as disability, the erosion of real jobs can be hidden in government jobs and debt can be turned into investments, but no matter how you dress up poverty, the rags still peek out from underneath.”
-Sultan Kinish


6 posted on 04/13/2015 8:40:39 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Not deniable = Not falsifiable = Not science = Not even wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So long as government spending is included as 25% (or so) of the Gross Domestic Product, any positive number is more than likely NOT to be an indication of the economic health of business in this nation. You see, government spending almost NEVER goes down from year to year.... there are never any budget cuts, just cuts to the rate of spending growth. Seeing contraction in GDP for what it is... if one is capable of seeing through the phony baloney GDP metric, as reported by the phony baloney supine catamite press, that the state of US business, and actual production of actual wealth is stagnated, at best.


7 posted on 04/13/2015 8:49:00 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is the Potemkin economy. Been lying about it for over 6 years now. From Green jobs, shovel ready jobs, cash for clunkers, coming back from the brink, to numerous recovery summers, etc....its all been a giant Goebbels like lie.


8 posted on 04/13/2015 8:52:36 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

D’oh! Took the words right from my mouth/typing hands.

Casual consumption of those economic numbers is what these guys are hoping for. Most people just glance at the headlines anyway.

With the modern education, hope for any understanding is even slimmer.


9 posted on 04/13/2015 9:06:53 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The problem is that the growth in the technology and financial sectors are covering up for the implosion in the middle class. In short, we have an uneven recovery from the 2008 stock market crash.

Only with real meaningful tax and regulatory reform will we get the type of recovery we experienced in the 1980's.

10 posted on 04/13/2015 9:09:18 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

The education system is the reason for the problems in this country. I saw a picture of a relative the other day at a pro abortion rally. She doesn’t know that had it not been for her pro life father she would have been aborted.

Her pro life father is a conservative Christian. He mother is a left wing something or other. They were divorced early so you know who had the most influence. Then put the kid into a college taught by left wingers and she is the result.

The father might have had a fighting chance against the mother. But there was no way he could win against the entire system. His only hope is God shows her the light someday.


11 posted on 04/13/2015 9:15:15 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Obama voters are my enemy. And so are RINO voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bump


12 posted on 04/13/2015 9:57:20 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Make no mistake.

If a Republican wins in 2016, they press will suddenly discover how bad the economy really is!


13 posted on 04/13/2015 10:19:55 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

http://web.nacm.org/CMI/PDF/CMIcurrent.pdf
See NACM Rejection of Credit Applications Index

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/cbo-feds-taxing-more-spending-more-running-bigger-deficit-2015


14 posted on 04/13/2015 6:26:27 PM PDT by griswold3 (Just another unlicensed nonconformist in am dangerous Liberal world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson