That is not the innovation. They've had phone connected watches before, with wires. . . and even bluetooth for voice communication. It was just a step up to display sharing. It was NOT a smartwatch. You do not have a clue if you think a device that can show a screen to one that completely interact with one and also act independently.
>>You do not have a clue if you think a device that can show a screen to one that completely interact with one and also act independently.<<
You can worship your apple masters all you want — their latest set of offerings are just tinkering with things their betters preceded them with.
The watch as a wireless display to the base unit is the innovation, as anyone with 1/2 a brain can see.
The rest — just tinkering. The latest apple tinkering of their copy of the Galaxy 5 and Note are nice — just as the Galaxy 6 is just tinkering with the iFanbpy 6. In fact, Galaxy went BACKWARDS just to match the silly features and look and feel of the iFanboy 6. I hope they the Galaxy will re-establish themselves with the Galaxy and Note 7s since I don’t care for the 6s.
Or do I need to school you on the history of client-server technology?
Just tinkering. Nothing new here. But apple hasn’t had a new idea since the original mac or the ipod.