_____________________________________
"The logical import of Obama’s vote against BAIPA [Born-Alive Infant Protection Act] is that he disagrees, i.e., once a baby has been targeted for abortion it thereafter has no inherent right to the food, comfort, and medical care provided to other babies born alive.
Indeed, during Illinois state senate deliberations on BAIPA, Obama stated that one of his objections was that the bill was “designed to burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion.” Apparently, once the decision to abort has been made, a child is doomed even if born alive."
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290764/clarifying-obamas-vote-born-alive-peter-kirsanow
Well, they needed her to be re-impregnated.
It is like cattle and studding.
They used to, and some probably still do, throw them in the trash along with coffee grounds and cigarette butts.
Some contract with medical refuse companies to roll up and take them off their hands.
Others pay for food grade garbage disposals to be installed in which to get rid of the bodies.
All of which, they have to pay someone to remove the bodies.
How novel that they have a new solution in which they get paid to do remove the dead baby's bodies.
Satan -- the idea man who just keeps giving.
How can it be difficult to defund this hideous group? I really don’t understand.