Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why a Court Blocked a New Anti-Planned Parenthood Video
National Journal ^ | July 30, 2015 | Sam Baker

Posted on 07/31/2015 10:42:42 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas

Why a Court Blocked a New Anti-Planned Parenthood Video

Planned Parenthood’s critics can’t release video that might have been recorded illegally.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: realreasonblocked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
What is truth really? Can we trust we are being told the truth by Planned Parenthood, Administration, Congress or media? Is it possible video implicates a Congress member or administration? Or could it be the intact baby was a certain ethnicity? Who should we trust to tell us the truth? Seems to me we should be putting our trust in individuals trying to help the poor unborn babies being sacrificed.
1 posted on 07/31/2015 10:42:42 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

They let the animal rights people who film inside slaughter facilities, labs, and when they commit their terrorism/vandalism show their films which weer most definitely obtained illegally.


2 posted on 07/31/2015 10:44:55 AM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

The young guy interviewed said the tape is prima facie evidence that Cell Express (or whatever) broke the law. I am sure Kalifornia’s “legal” denizens are all for squashing it, but tis only applies to Kali, I believe.


3 posted on 07/31/2015 10:46:24 AM PDT by gr8eman (Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

Yeah..the same people who had no problem with Romney’s 47% comment..


4 posted on 07/31/2015 10:47:25 AM PDT by BerniesFriend (Sarah Palin-"Lord knows she's attractive" says bitter Andrea Mitchell and the rest of the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rey

What is truth really? Can we trust we are being told the truth by Planned Parenthood, Administration, Congress or media? Is it possible video implicates a Congress member or administration? Or could it be the intact baby was a certain ethnicity? Who should we trust to tell us the truth? Seems to me we should be putting our trust in individuals trying to help the poor unborn babies being sacrificed.


5 posted on 07/31/2015 10:47:38 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Romans 1:18-32 ..............God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

This kind of thing doesn’t seem to bother the left when they record illegally.


6 posted on 07/31/2015 10:48:00 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

It would be a shame if the Center for Medical Progress computers were hacked and the video was released by hackers in Bulgaria.


7 posted on 07/31/2015 10:49:58 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

Well we are talking about here is a botched abortion where a baby is born Alive! Then is left to die,that’s s whole new ballgame,even for the pro democrat baby butchering factories


8 posted on 07/31/2015 10:51:46 AM PDT by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

So much for the 1st Amendment. Put it on the web for free and people will copy it and spread it around


9 posted on 07/31/2015 10:52:33 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

One of the bio-medical companies that buys parts of dead babies from Planned Parenthood (StemExpress) got a TRO to prevent one video that had their employees in it from being aired by CMP. Even though the recording took place in a restaurant, there is a question as to whether the recording violated CA law.

Apparently, what they aren’t mentioning is that one reason the company does not want the video aired is because the employees in question admit to receiving intact babies from PP, indicating that the children might have been born alive...

Of course, if CMP had already shared the video in question with someone else, and THEY posted the video, there is nothing the court can do. And the court’s order may be an illegal prior restraint in the first place.

But even if CMP decides to comply with this order, the court order does not prevent CMP from airing any of the other videos they have.


10 posted on 07/31/2015 10:53:13 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Stupid judge who doesn’t know the law. IT was recorded in a restaurant, an open public place. Therefore secrecy was not expected. The video was recorded legally.

Stupid judge. Wonder how many other cases she ruled on and didn’t know the law?


11 posted on 07/31/2015 10:55:08 AM PDT by Kozy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

How does a local Superior Court block the release of the video outside of the state?


12 posted on 07/31/2015 10:56:33 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
But even if CMP decides to comply with this order, the court order does not prevent CMP from airing any of the other videos they have.

It occurs to me that this TRO might even be useful in building interest and suspense regarding what is contained inside.

This ploy might even generate more publicity for that particular video, and possibly even demands to see it.

13 posted on 07/31/2015 10:57:01 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

The law doesn’t matter. The only calculus is whether it does enough damage to target that any law enforcement over any broken law is forced to back down in fear.
That is the ethos of the Democrats. So its ok for us to use it too.

Good times,,,


14 posted on 07/31/2015 10:57:59 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Different concept of what is legal and what is illegal. If it promotes leftist ideals then it is surely legal. Conversely for anything conservative.


15 posted on 07/31/2015 10:57:59 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas
"What is truth...?"

Isn't that what Pilot asked Jesus....

16 posted on 07/31/2015 10:58:23 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas
The purpose of wiretapping laws is not to protect citizens.

The purpose of wiretapping laws is to prevent citizens from exposing criminal behavior by agents of the US government and their proxies.

17 posted on 07/31/2015 11:05:05 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (To defeat the democRATs, we must first defeat the Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

It occurred to me that since we have been pounded so much lately with “black lives matter” that if that poor little angel that was intact was of African-American descent then cities would burn if that video was shown and Obama would not be able to stop the ensuing chaos. We have heard so often that more African-American babies are aborted at Planned Parenthood and knowing what that evil Margaret Sanger’s intentions truly were in founding Planned Parenthood it would not surprise me they blocked video with some lame ass excuse. At this point I always begin with believing all involved with the money will lie to cover their asses.


18 posted on 07/31/2015 11:06:12 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Romans 1:18-32 ..............God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
And someday some mysterious person might just leak it.

Totally unauthorized, of course, but the feral government has things "leak" all the time.

19 posted on 07/31/2015 11:06:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (To defeat the democRATs, we must first defeat the Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

a botched abortion where a baby is born Alive! Then is left to die, —

The problem is that the baby, oops, fetus, was not registered as a demoncrat voter first.

/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/ss/s/s/s/s/s/s/s//////ssssss

Yes, I am full of /s


20 posted on 07/31/2015 11:08:27 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson