Posted on 09/23/2015 11:43:02 AM PDT by Beave Meister
Just last evening, I posted an article about how the UN disgracefully named Saudi Arabia to head its human rights panel.
So how do the Saudis plan on celebrating this achievement? By executing a teenager via crucifixion, naturally.
I covered this story back in May in the piece, Not ISIS Saudi Arabia Prepares to Execute and Publicly Display Beheaded Body of Political Activist in Crucifixion. Here are a few excerpts:
The Saudis have received a lot of bad press as of late due to it consistently breaking its own records for beheadings, but sometimes a simple beheading isnt sufficient. In a punishment known as crucifixion, the executed persons beheaded body is placed on public display for three days. Currently facing this fate are three political activists, including two children. We learn from Reprieve.org that:
Sheikh Nimr Baqir Al Nimr, a 53-year old critic of the Saudi regime, and two juveniles, Ali Mohammed al-Nimr and Dawoud Hussain al-Marhoon, were arrested during a 2012 crackdown on anti-government protests in the Shiite province of Qatif. After a trial marred by irregularities, Mr Al Nimr was sentenced to death by crucifixion on charges including insulting the King and delivering religious sermons that disrupt national unity. This week, it emerged that the authorities plan to execute him on Thursday, despite protests from the UN and Saudi human rights organizations.
(Excerpt) Read more at libertyblitzkrieg.com ...
It never ceases to amaze me how the same Liberals who jump on Christians for daring to speak about their religious beliefs ignore stories like this...and even defend....the religious beliefs that millions of followers in the region follow that condone this barbarianism. Oh the hypocrisy.
SA should have ceased to exist on 9/12/2001.
Sadomasochistic creeps.
Been there, hope to never go back. Big $$ is not worth the $4!t you have to put up with in that $4!thole. Those pr!ck$ suck.
KSA is heading a UN Human Rights panel? That sounds about par for the course... up is down, good is evil, etc.
In the name of “diversity”, will ISIS operatives be put in charge of women’s shelters? Will Afghani pedophiles become boy scout leaders? How crazy do things have to get before people say enough is enough?
That Sharia Law really IS inconsistent with our constitution.
Do you think America will wake up and smell not the coffee, but the BLOOD of our citizens should islam/shari’a take deeper root here?
DON’T COUNT ON IT!
Read below what Dayanand Saraswati, Indian sage, said in 1883.
A real eye-opener, close to Churchill’s comment on the subject. And MILES away from Carly Fiorina’s, Lindsey Graham’s, Bush’s and several others. You’d better find out how EVERY candidate stands on this one while we MAY still have time to stop them.
PS: IT AIN’T A “RELIGION”!!
Dayanand Saraswati, Indian sage, said in 1883:
“Having thus given a cursory view of the Koran, I lay it before the sensible person with the purpose that they should know what kind of a book the Koran is. I have no hesitation to say that it cannot be the work of either God or of a learned man, nor can it be a book of knowledge. Here its very vital defect has been exposed with the object that people may not waste their life falling into its imposition. The Koran is the result of ignorance, the source of animalization of human beings, a fruitful cause of destroying peace, an incentive to war, and propagator of hostility among men and a promoter of suffering in society. As to defect of repetition, the Koran is its store.”
The WH is considering implementing this idea for those who criticize Islam.
Do you think America will wake up and smell not the coffee, but the BLOOD of our citizens should islam/shari’a take deeper root here?
DON’T COUNT ON IT!
Read below what Dayanand Saraswati, Indian sage, said in 1883.
A real eye-opener, close to Churchill’s comment on the subject. And MILES away from Carly Fiorina’s, Lindsey Graham’s, Bush’s and several others. You’d better find out how EVERY candidate stands on this one while we MAY still have time to stop them.
PS: IT AIN’T A “RELIGION”!!
Dayanand Saraswati, Indian sage, said in 1883:
“Having thus given a cursory view of the Koran, I lay it before the sensible person with the purpose that they should know what kind of a book the Koran is. I have no hesitation to say that it cannot be the work of either God or of a learned man, nor can it be a book of knowledge. Here its very vital defect has been exposed with the object that people may not waste their life falling into its imposition. The Koran is the result of ignorance, the source of animalization of human beings, a fruitful cause of destroying peace, an incentive to war, and propagator of hostility among men and a promoter of suffering in society. As to defect of repetition, the Koran is its store.”
What are the main differences between Our Friends the Saudi’s and ISIS?
Actually the holding of hands thing, in Arabic cultures, is a sign of friendship and deep respect between the two that do it, even two men.
I guess one could argue that W was showing too much respect to the King there but it wasn’t a sign of submission on W’s part that much is certain.
Adopting the custom and practice of that backwards and hostile society IS submissive, if you ask me.
But that is, of course, only my personal opinion.
And for an American man to be seen holding the hand of another man — is a sign of simpering weakness.
OUTSTANDING!!!!
The 7th Century will always be with us. :-)
Gay but not submissive. :-)
“That Sharia Law really IS inconsistent with our constitution.”
Not to mention thousands of laws and millions of regulations here in this country.
Saudi Arabia should be obliterated from the face of the earth. There is no reason for them and their ungodly “religion” to exist among humankind.
Waiting for the pope to condemn this... ... ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.