Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This is one of 60 micrometeorites extracted from 2.7 billion year old limestone, from the Pilbara region in Western Australia. These micrometeorites consist of iron oxide minerals that formed when dust particles of meteoritic iron metal were oxidised as they entered Earth's atmosphere, indicating that the ancient upper atmosphere was surprisingly oxygen-rich.

1 posted on 05/12/2016 10:00:37 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JimSEA

Very interesting! Especially considering the theories behind the starting point where life went from anaerobic to aerobic respiration.

I wonder if the models will have to be redrawn. What caused that methane layer to dissipate? What introduced that oxygen-heavy layer, if it wasn’t CO2 respiration from new upstart life?


2 posted on 05/12/2016 10:03:24 AM PDT by Syncopated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA

“Dr Tomkins explained that the new results suggest the Earth at this time may have had a layered atmosphere with little vertical mixing, and higher levels of oxygen in the upper atmosphere produced by the breakdown of CO 2 by ultraviolet light.

“A possible explanation for this layered atmosphere might have involved a methane haze layer at middle levels of the atmosphere. The methane in such a layer would absorb UV light, releasing heat and creating a warm zone in the atmosphere that would inhibit vertical mixing,” Dr Tomkins said.”

This changes a lot of what we thought we knew. It doesn’t negate earlier findings so much as it suggests more information and has implications in both abiogenesis and the search for life elsewhere in the Universe.


3 posted on 05/12/2016 10:05:49 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA

6 posted on 05/12/2016 10:15:32 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump For America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA

O2 would be heavier than CH4. So (1) what keeps it in the upper atmosphere rather than the lower; (2) why wouldn’t the methane burn at the first spark?


8 posted on 05/12/2016 10:52:32 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA

Or maybe the methane/lightning/life theory is bogus.


11 posted on 05/12/2016 11:14:46 AM PDT by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand. If you are French raise both hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA

Stanley Miller, call your office.


15 posted on 05/12/2016 11:56:19 AM PDT by D_Idaho ("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA

That there’s some OLD dirt!


19 posted on 05/12/2016 1:34:34 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson