Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There's a disturbance in the force! Star Wars spin-off Rogue One is 'so bad Disney chiefs ordered F
UK Daily Mail ^ | May 31, 2016 | Mike Larkin

Posted on 05/31/2016 6:08:56 AM PDT by C19fan

It has a release date that is not so far, far away. But Disney bosses are apparently so alarmed at how bad the new Star Wars spin-off movie Rogue One is that they have ordered four weeks of expensive reshoots in a bid to salvage the project. After the money-making bonanza that was The Force Awakens, they are reportedly shocked at how the new film, which takes place shortly before the original Star Wars and features delicate English starlet Felicity Jones as a tough-talking maverick pilot.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: disney; felicityjones; feminismiscancer; rogueone; star; starwars; wars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: angryoldfatman

“Perhaps Donald Duck as a Fleet Admiral was a bad choice.”


It’s a twap!


21 posted on 05/31/2016 7:19:21 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The Force Awakens made money because it had the original stars.

And the original plot.

22 posted on 05/31/2016 7:20:18 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

What can they do to ruin a movie that they haven’t done already ?


23 posted on 05/31/2016 7:22:42 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All

I like the Fan films of some movies that you can find on youtube... Here’s a decent Star Wars short featuring Darth Maul...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djo_91jN3Pk


24 posted on 05/31/2016 7:35:51 AM PDT by mugsaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Or those two horrible Ewok made for TV movies?


25 posted on 05/31/2016 7:39:58 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Celerity

It’s Darby O’Gill and the Little Ewoks!


26 posted on 05/31/2016 8:21:25 AM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

My original theory still stands, I think that the girl from this movie and Darth Vader are Rey’s parents.


27 posted on 05/31/2016 9:04:20 AM PDT by chae (The Lannisters send their regards--Game of Thrones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
and features delicate English starlet Felicity Jones as a tough-talking maverick pilot.

Oh gee, another movie feature some pipsqueak chick who can kick six guys' asses at the same time. How cliche'd.

28 posted on 05/31/2016 9:05:29 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

When I was in Florida teaching a class, I overheard two guys walking through the parking lot. The one guy says “Whenever I can’t sleep, I just put on Start Wars, and I’m right out!”

I wanted to object, because I knew “the force awakens”! ;-P


29 posted on 05/31/2016 9:08:48 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Disney probably needs it to be good because there will likely be attraction tie-ins at the new Star Wars Land at Disneyland.

-PJ

30 posted on 05/31/2016 9:22:23 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Disney is all about merchandising and promoting whatever Big Government wants.

And in return, disney gets perpetual copyright.

31 posted on 05/31/2016 11:43:03 AM PDT by zeugma (Welcome to the "interesting times" you were warned about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

hahaha...!


32 posted on 05/31/2016 5:46:45 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Oh gee, another movie feature some pipsqueak chick who can kick six guys' asses at the same time. How cliche'd. In all fairness, Bruce Lee (or was it Jackie Chan) managed to pull off fighting bigger guys than him despite essentially being a pipsqueak himself in terms of appearance, so it does have some basis in reality. That being said... Felicity Jones' character may have gone way too far regarding strengths, especially when there's very little way to justify them, even being more unjustified in this than Rey (and I was pretty irritated at her being so skilled at the force that even the term "prodigy" would have failed to even begin to describe her skills. A Mary Sue if there ever was one), who at least had the fact that she's a Force User as an excuse for her being able to take down guys bigger than her. Plenty of other female characters who are either shown or at least implied to be fully capable of taking down guys at least had some justification that would make their doing so somewhat plausible. Supergirl/Powergirl, for instance, is a Kryptonian, meaning she was going to be far stronger than any standard human on the face of the planet, man or woman, with only Superman himself (maybe other Kryptonians like Nom or Zod) being stronger than her. Likewise, Ariel is a mermaid, and she spent a lot of her life under oceanic pressure, so her taking down human males would be perfectly justified as well. Felicity Jones really doesn't regarding taking down humans (not that I know of, anyways). I think the only other character to have little justifications for pulling stuff like that off is Belle whenever she lifted up Maurice and Beast. Basically, the only way a petite chick can pull off actually beating the crap out of six guys at the same time and actually have it be somewhat plausible is if she's a Martial Artist (up to and including being a ninja), a Force User, or not an actual human (and by that, I mean she HAS the appearance of a human, but her origins are not actually human and most likely had to endure a more unforgiving environment like extensive oceanic pressure or living on a planet that had much heavier gravity than on Earth, like if she were a space alien like a Kryptonian or a Saiyan, or if she were a more mythical creature like a merperson).
33 posted on 07/02/2016 5:07:33 AM PDT by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson