Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The B-58 Hustler Was America’s Cold War Nuclear Bomber Blunder
War is Boring ^ | July 29, 2016 | Robert Farley

Posted on 07/29/2016 6:28:24 AM PDT by C19fan

In an era of fantastic aircraft, the B-58 Hustler was one of the most visually striking warplanes ever to fly. Its delta wing, giant engines, and remarkable performance gave rise to the myth that pilots could literally tear the wings off the bomber if they flew it too fast.

(Excerpt) Read more at warisboring.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: bombers; planes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Hulka

I think I once saw a video of a B-47 doing a an up-and-over maneuver to sling a nuke onto target. First time it had been done, IIRC


21 posted on 07/29/2016 7:02:50 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Still an awesome looking machine.


22 posted on 07/29/2016 7:04:32 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

It’s a badd-ass looking plane, though.


23 posted on 07/29/2016 7:05:08 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

They have one at the USAF museum in Dayton, OH.


24 posted on 07/29/2016 7:05:24 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Yes, that was a maneuver they used, to toss the nuke, to send the bomb on the way while at the same time giving the jet time to turn around and start running away.


25 posted on 07/29/2016 7:05:36 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham; Gaffer

Me too—one of my favorite models too as a kid.

Here’s a video of the B-58 Hustler:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qx-uZZVc0dE


26 posted on 07/29/2016 7:06:08 AM PDT by exit82 (Road Runner sez:" Let's Make America Beeping Great Again! Beep! Beep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Never heard about the O2 problem, by the 80’s I suspect the problem was fixed.


27 posted on 07/29/2016 7:06:40 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

In this film, the B-47 actually rolled over at the apex.....back to horizontal flying. Impressive.


28 posted on 07/29/2016 7:07:03 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

I did not know that. I guess that would explain his (in the end unfortunate) fascination with planes and flying.


29 posted on 07/29/2016 7:08:40 AM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

I believe it was a good plane but probably not one that should have gone outside US control at the time. The problems were mainly with the German ones which had a horrible record.

I also built a model of it. I never understood how it could fly until I realized about its thrust.


30 posted on 07/29/2016 7:11:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Well-...

TO THIS DAY - still maintains the LONGEST sustained supersonic flight- what was really dangerous? like the F14A- it was the engines- at super sonic speed if an engine
flamed out- the aircraft became totally unstable-
(just remarkable-.. a record that has not been broken
since 1963?- just like the SR71- we made some amazing
Tech)

(for the longest Sustained flight- they actually had
an afterburner fail on one of the engines- finished the
flight at reduced speed-) also- during this period-
the YF12-A was in test development- this development-
led to the XB70 Valkyrie- but things move fast- missle
systems soon rendered super fast bombers obsolete-

left the B52 tried and true-
B1-(100 built) to replace the aging B52- Whole -nother story on
carter canceling- Reagan building-

now B2- the stealth bomber- very expensive strategic
asset - only reason is to maintain the U.S. nuclear
Triad policy


31 posted on 07/29/2016 7:13:20 AM PDT by mj1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Yea, well since it is called the Ardvark it looses points.


32 posted on 07/29/2016 7:28:52 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I worked on the B-52 at Walker AFB, and was qualified to work in B-58 at LRAFB. The had me work on KC-135Q instead.
They used to take off from LRAFB quite often.

As a kid I saw the B-47 take off quite often from Walker AFB, one right after another. LeMay kept the SAC crews on their toes!
Saw a B-36 fly low over Farmington NM back in 1955. First thing I noticed was the propellers were on the back side of the engines.


33 posted on 07/29/2016 7:32:16 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I also built the Revell B-58 as a kid. What a great-looking airplane.

Never saw a B-58 fly, but when I was stationed at McCoy an RAF Vulcan bomber flew in for a bombing competition. At the end of the competition it took off from the field and disappeared over the horizon; then it came back and did a victory roll! One of the coolest things I ever saw. (The victory roll was kind of ironic; their crew placed last in the competition, beaten by all the SAC B-52 crews.)

34 posted on 07/29/2016 7:35:20 AM PDT by jumpingcholla34 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jumpingcholla34

I did the same thing, ahh... the smell of model glue in the morning, like victory.


35 posted on 07/29/2016 7:36:29 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Articles like this remind me not of just the mistakes but also of the successes of US Military Aircraft. In this particular, the last line of this article gives credit to the grand old BUFF; "Only planes like the B-52, with enough flexibility to handle a variety of different kinds of mission, would survive."

Initially contracted (1946) as the follow-on to the B17(Flying Fortess) -> B29(Super Fortress) strategic bombers, the B52 Stratofortress' first flight was in 1952. This means that it is easily possible for a grandkid to be flying in a B52H (1963) that was flown by a granddad!

With an inflation adjusted cost of $81million, 80% mission ready rate and a hourly cost of $73k, use of the 8,800 mile range (un-refueled) B52H remains attractive EXCEPT FOR well-defended air spaces. The USAF projects using the 90+ remaining B52s into the 2040s, giving a chance for g.grandkids to fly! A definite NON-Blunder!

36 posted on 07/29/2016 7:42:37 AM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
When you absolutly positivly have to deliver 5 nuclear payloads on time and on target....accept no substitutes!


37 posted on 07/29/2016 7:53:55 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

I love the USAF Museum at Dayton. I had to drive 20 hours to get there, and it was worth the trip!


38 posted on 07/29/2016 7:57:01 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (The 2nd Amendment immediately follows the 1st because some people are hard of hearing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Hmmm....Too bad we don't have a few around to upgrade...

Add fly-by-wire, all glass cockpit, HOTAS, and 2, just 2 F-119 engines...

Man kick the tires and light the fires, I am all in ;-)

39 posted on 07/29/2016 8:00:06 AM PDT by taildragger (Not my Monkey, not my Circus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

John Denver was one hell of a pilot


40 posted on 07/29/2016 8:09:50 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson