34% Dem/29% Rep/33% Indie breakdown
(sigh) I have no idea if any of these polls are accurate anymore. I hate to think 2012 is happening all over again.
Other polls have them nearly even, still others report Trump ahead by double digits... What all this really says is that polling is an inexact “science” at best. It is subject to all kinds of biases and offsets. Ultimately what counts are ballots - and how badly the immensely corrupt democrats cheat in an attempt to steal the election through fraud.
Never heard of it. Do they have any sort of track record or is this just some fly by night push poll?
Propaganda?!
Well if the Polls are right and the nation is going whole hog for Hillary then we have truly reached the end and time to bunker in...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3477233/posts
UGH!
This poll says something, that polls says something else.
Seven Hells what are we to make of this?
Isn’t this where Chuck Todd started out? It’s also fun to read some of the moonbat comments following the article, some of them are just that brutal, lol.
These polls are bull. Total smokescreen by the liberal media. Have faith. God will deliver Trump. If not we are all doomed.
D + 5.
Hillary is up 10 +?
Yeah, sure.
The horrible libs are attempting to demoralize us good Americans by skewing the polls.
I’m sure Hillary is spending plenty of money to make this happen.
Methodology - The Fairleigh Dickinson University poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone September 28-October 2, 2016 among a random national sample of 862 registered voters, including 788 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of +/- 4.4 percentage points for likely voters (the basis for the analysis presented in this press release), including the design effect.
Survey results are also subject to non-sampling error. This kind of error, which cannot be measured, arises from a number of factors including, but not limited to, non-response (eligible individuals refusing to be interviewed), question wording, the order in which questions are asked, and variations among interviewers.
Interviews were conducted by SSRS of Media, Pennsylvania, with professionally trained interviewers using a CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) system. Random selection is achieved by computerized random-digit dialing. This technique gives every person with a landline or cellular phone number (including those with unlisted numbers) an equal chance of being selected
Oversampled indies.
CC
If she has done something to cause this I sure as hell can’t figure out what it is.
American Conservatives are NOT PARTICIPATING in the INET/Phone Polling. They have decided that the polling groups will skew the results toward the “normalized candidate”.
The surprise will happen on NOV07...a land-slide that cannot be “stolen”.
Keep your powder dry my FRiends.
Obvious B.S. poll. No one thinks Hillary Clinton is going to win by ten points nationally, not even this pollster.
NO WAY.
Any poll that has either candidate ahead nationally by 10% is suspect. She would not be behind in all the State polls if this were half true.
Forget this poll it is obvious propaganda to supress turnout
The Democrat media is padding the polls to provide cover for Clinton voter fraud, so that the high numbers will have some credibility. If the GOP hasn’t figured out how to keep felons, illegals, multiple balloting, phony absentee ballots, and the dead from voting, they will never win another election. One-day voting on paper ballots with a finger dipped in indelible ink is the best way to conduct an honest election.
B.s....the questions asked per participant I can only imagine the instructions given to the call placers on where to place them...meaning any wording would make them anything but trump...i also envision a scenario where, only if after answering yes to, “are you sure?”, would it count for Trump.
bogus as a NYC street vendor Rolex.
Since she’s already won, I may as well vote for her too.
Oh woe is me.
Dem number is too high and Indy is low